家长式领导对员工建言行为激励内化机制研究——中庸思维调节下的跨层次分析

财经论丛 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 88-96.

家长式领导对员工建言行为激励内化机制研究——中庸思维调节下的跨层次分析

马鹏,蔡双立

天津财经大学商学院,天津 300222

收稿日期:2017-12-17 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-07-02
作者简介:马鹏(1979-),男,天津市人,天津财经大学商学院讲师,博士生;蔡双立(1963-),男,河南洛阳人,天津财经大学商学院教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(15AGL009)

A Cross-level Analysis of Motivation Internalization of the Effect of PaternalisticLeadership on Voice Behavior——The Moderating Effect of Mediocre Thinking

MA Peng, CAI Shuangli

Business School, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China

Received:2017-12-17 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-07-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 员工建言作为角色外组织公民行为,有助于企业规避风险、提升组织绩效与创新绩效,推动组织变革。本文探究建言行为的激励内化过程与机制,考察领导、个体和文化价值观三个层面要素在此过程中的作用效果与范围,并展开实证检验。结果表明:家长式领导通过上司支持感和心理安全感间接影响员工建言,其中心理安全感是建言行为发生的决定性因素;中庸思维正向调节上司支持感与建言行为之间的关系,高中庸水平的员工更容易在上司支持感的作用下提出促进型建言,而这一调节效应在心理安全感和建言行为的关系中并不显著。本文采用的跨层次研究有助于理解建言行为的触发、认知和决策过程以及建言理论本土文化的适用性。

关键词: 建言行为, 家长式领导风格, 上司支持感, 心理安全感, 中庸思维

Abstract: As an extra role organizational citizen behavior, the employee voice facilitates corporations to avoid risks, boost performance, innovation as well as reform. As a result, how to encourage voice behavior has become an urgent need for corporations in the fierce competition. This paper discusses the motivation internalization of voice behavior from paternalistic leadership, analysing the moderating effect of a Confucian concept-mediocre thinking on this process. The empirical study shows complete mediation effects of perceived organizational support and psychological safety between paternalistic leadership and voice behavior.The results also reveal that compared to perceived organizational support, psychological safety is the necessary condition to encourage voice behavior. Moreover, there is a significant effect of the moderator of mediocre thinking on perceived organizational support, buttheeffect on psychological safetyis insignificant. This cross-level study assists us to understand the trigger, cognition and decision-making mechanism of voice behavior as well as the adaptation of this concept in the management of Chinese enterprises.

Key words: Voice Behavior, Paternalistic Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support, Psychological Safety, Mediocre Thinking

中图分类号:

F713.55

马鹏,蔡双立. 家长式领导对员工建言行为激励内化机制研究——中庸思维调节下的跨层次分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(7): 88-96.

MA Peng, CAI Shuangli. A Cross-level Analysis of Motivation Internalization of the Effect of PaternalisticLeadership on Voice Behavior——The Moderating Effect of Mediocre Thinking[J]. , 2018, 34(7): 88-96.

参考文献

[1] Burris E.R., Detert J.R., Chiaburu D.S. Quitting Before Leaving: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Attachment and Detachment on Voice[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(4):912-22.
[2] 罗瑾琏, 赵佳. 真实型领导对员工建言行为的影响机理研究[J]. 软科学, 2013, 27(12):41-44.
[3] 朱玥, 王晓辰. 服务型领导对员工建言行为的影响:领导-成员交换和学习目标取向的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2015,(2):426-432.
[4] 务凯,李永鑫, 刘霞. 家长式领导与员工建言行为:领导-成员交换的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3):384-389.
[5] 段锦云. 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响:心理安全感的中介机制[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(10):109-116.
[6] 胡国栋, 王晓杰.中国情境下组织公民行为研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2016,(4):3-10.
[7] Cheng B.S., Chou L.F., Huang M.P., Wu T.Y.,Farh J.L.Paternalistic Leadership and Subordinate Responses: Establishing a Leadership Model in Chinese Organizations[J]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2004,7(1):89–117.
[8] Kottke J.L., Sharafinski C.E. Measuring Perceived Supervisory and Organizational Support[J]. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1988, 48(4):1075-1079.
[9] 汪洪艳,陈志霞. 绩效考核政治对员工组织公民行为的影响——差序氛围的调节作用[J]. 经济经纬, 2018, (1):286-297.
[10] Jin N.C. Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Effects of Work Environment Characteristics and Intervening Psychological Processes[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2007, 28(4):467-484.
[11] 陈忠卫, 潘莎. 组织公正感的理论研究进展与发展脉络述评[J]. 现代财经, 2012, (7):115-121.
[12] May D.R., Gilson R.L., Harter L.M. The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety and Availability and the Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work[J]. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 2004, 77(1):11-37.
[13] Nembhard I.M., Edmondson A.C. Making It Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(7):941-966.
[14] Milliken F.J., Morrison E.W., Hewlin P.F. An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(6):1453–1476.
[15] 杨中芳. 传统文化与社会科学结合之实例:中庸的社会心理学研究[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2009, 23(3):53-60.
[16] 何轩. 互动公平真的就能治疗“沉默”病吗？——以中庸思维作为调节变量的本土实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2009,(4):128-134.
[17] 段锦云,凌斌.中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(10):1185-1197.
[18] 张军伟, 龙立荣. 服务型领导对员工人际公民行为的影响:宽恕氛围与中庸思维的作用[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1):43-51.
[19] 郑伯埙,周丽芳,樊景立. 家长式领导量表:三元模式的建构与测量[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2000, (14): 3-64.
[20] Farh J.L., Hackett R.D., Liang J. Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support-Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3):715-729.
[21] Detert J.R., Burris E.R. Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open？[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(4):869-884.
[22] 吴佳辉,林义正.中庸思维量表的编制[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2005, (24):247-300.
[23] Van Dyne L., Ang S., Botero I. Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, (40):1359-1392.
[24] Zhang Y., Huai M.Y., Xie Y.H. Paternalistic Leadership and Employee Voice in China: A Dual Process Model[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2015, 26(1):25-36.
[25] 吴玺玫. 组织公民行为的形成机理和员工管理对策[J]. 经济经纬, 2010,(5):72-76.
[26] 段锦云, 张倩. 建言行为的认知影响因素、理论基础及发生机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(1):115-126.