Collected Essays on Finance and Economics ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 15-24.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Administrative Intervention, Officials' Tenure, and Local Government Bond Issuance Pricing

LIU Rui1, YOU Pin2,3   

  1. 1. Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China;
    2. School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
    3. Economic Behavior and Policy Simulation Laboratory, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • Received:2021-01-29 Online:2022-04-10 Published:2022-04-02

行政干预、官员任期与地方政府债券发行定价

刘锐1, 攸频2,3   

  1. 1.中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所,北京 100732;
    2.南开大学经济学院,天津 300071;
    3.南开大学经济行为与政策模拟实验室,天津 300071
  • 作者简介:刘锐(1987—),男,湖北黄冈人,中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所博士后;攸频(1979—),女,河北南宫人,南开大学经济学院、经济行为与政策模拟实验室副教授。

Abstract: The local government bond issuance pricing is related to the smooth issuance of local government bonds and is one of the most important issues in the local government bond market. Due to the obvious administrative intervention in the issuance of local government bonds in our country, the interest rate is significantly lower than the secondary market pricing level, thus the research on its mechanism has become an important focus of the research on the local government bond market. Using the local government bond issuance data from May 2015 to the end of 2019 as the sample, this paper converts the monthly data into the seasonal panel data to construct a pricing model based on officials' tenure and the administrative intervention influencing factors of the pricing, so as to examine the pricing mechanism of local governments' bond issuance. The results show that officials' tenure and the local government administrative intervention are important factors affecting the interest rate spread of local government bond issuance, and officials' tenure and the interest rate spread present an inverted U-shaped relationship. In addition, the U-shaped turning point of officials' tenure is about 2 years. Further study finds that the term of officials affects the interest rate spread by adjusting the administrative intervention of local governments, making the spread even more unbalanced. At the same time, improvements in the management of treasury cash deposits will help reduce the impact of local governments' fiscal deposits on the interest rate spreads. This article further introduces the “window guidance” of the Ministry of Finance to verify the impact of the administrative intervention on the spread. It is found that the “window guidance” can effectively increase the spread, improve the issuance efficiency, and reduce the administrative intervention. Based on the research conclusions of this article regarding officials' tenure and the primary market pricing, in order to promote the rationalization of the primary market pricing, this article proposes four main policy recommendations. The first suggestion is to strengthen the treasury cash management, establish a public bidding system for fiscal deposits, improve the transparency of local governments' treasury cash management, and reduce the reliance on the accounts of the four major commercial banks. The second suggestion is to strengthen the construction of industry self-regulatory organizations, strictly manage issuers, respond to negative feedback from institutional investors, and optimize the issuance procedures. The third suggestion is to actively develop related bond derivatives, activate the local government bond secondary market, issue related bond ETFs, and promote the construction of local government bond yield curves in a timely manner. The fourth suggestion is to improve the pricing mechanism of the primary market for local government bonds, increase the level of market-based pricing, focus on establishing a pricing benchmark for issuance, clarify that the pricing of local government bonds in the primary market should be priced by their secondary yield curve, and actively introduce non-bank institutions in underwriting. The innovation of this paper is that for the first time, the characteristics of officials' tenure are introduced into the research of local government bond issuance pricing, and the pricing model based on the administrative intervention and officials' tenure is constructed. By studying the impact of these two non-market-oriented factors on the issuance pricing, it explores the motivation of local governments to intervene in bond issuance under the performance evaluation of debt audits for the local government leaders, thereby enriching existing local government bonds research results of the issuance mechanism.

Key words: Local Government Bond, Administrative Intervention, Local Officials'Tenure, Pricing of Issuance

摘要: 本文以2015年5月至2019年末地方政府债券发行数据为样本,通过构建基于官员任期和行政干预下的地方政府债券发行定价模型,分析我国地方政府债券发行定价机制和内在机理。研究发现,官员任期和地方政府行政干预是影响地方政府债券发行利差的重要因素,且官员任期与地方政府债券发行利差呈现倒U型关系。本文的进一步研究发现,官员任期通过调节地方政府行政干预影响地方政府债券发行利差,使得地方政府债券发行利差更加失衡。同时,国库现金存款管理的改进有助于降低地方政府财政存款对发行利差的影响。因此,本文提出政府应进一步完善财政存款管理细则、严格约束地方政府行政干预行为、优化地方政府债券发行定价机制等相关政策建议。

关键词: 地方政府债券, 地方政府干预, 官员任期, 发行定价

CLC Number: