Collected Essays on Finance and Economics ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 15-24.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Evolution of Value Added Trade Networks along the “Belt and Road”and Its Influencing Factors

GE Chunbao1, YU Jinping1, LIU Yapan2   

  1. 1. School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China;
    2. Shenzhen Branch, China Merchants Bank, Shenzhen 518000,China
  • Received:2021-04-15 Online:2022-07-10 Published:2022-07-07

“一带一路”增加值贸易网络演变及其影响因素

葛纯宝1, 于津平1, 刘亚攀2   

  1. 1.南京大学商学院,江苏 南京 210093;
    2.招商银行深圳分行,广东 深圳 518000
  • 作者简介:葛纯宝(1992—),男,安徽阜阳人,南京大学商学院博士生;于津平(1964—),男,江苏南通人,南京大学商学院教授;刘亚攀(1995—),男,河南南阳人,招商银行深圳分行经济师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(18VDL014)

Abstract: This paper examine the evolution characteristics of value-added trade networks of the countries along the route from 2003—2018 and their influencing factors. The results show that the value-added trade network of B&R has been expanding in scale, tending to be more closely linked, and gradually deepening in integration, and has formed a “multipolar” distribution pattern centered on China, Russia, Singapore and India and five cohesive subgroups of associations with obvious differences in the degree of linkage but relatively stable structures; The distribution of the network status of each country is not homogeneous with China, Russia and India in the “bridge” and hub positions; Geographical proximity, common language, FDI differences and industrial structure differences among countries explain 36% of the evolution of trade networks, and the influence of the four factors varies significantly in different stages. This paper argues that China should consider the interests and concerns of B&R from a global perspective, play a central linkage role, promote trade with investment, and deep and inclusive integration along the route.

Key words: Belt and Road, ValueAdded Trade, Social Network Analysis, QAP Method

摘要: 本文基于UNCTAD-Eora增加值贸易数据,采用SNA法和QAP法考察2003—2018年沿线国家增加值贸易网络演变特征及其影响因素。研究结果表明,沿线国家增加值贸易网络规模不断扩大、联系日趋紧密、融合度逐渐加深,已形成以中国、俄罗斯、新加坡和印度为中心的“多极化”分布格局和联结疏密差异明显但结构相对稳定的五大社团凝聚子群;各国的网络地位分布并非匀质,中国、俄罗斯和印度居于“桥梁”和枢纽地位;各国地理相邻、共同语言、直接投资关系和产业结构差异可解释36%的贸易网络演变,这四者的积极作用具有阶段性的差异。据此,我国应从全局考量各国利益及关切,发挥中心联结作用,以投资促进贸易,推动沿线国家深度包容性融合。

关键词: 一带一路, 增加值贸易, 社会网络分析, QAP法

CLC Number: