Urban-rural Transformation,Social Network and Moral Behavior Evolution

Abstract

Abstract: This study constructs a decision-making model to analyze the influence of associated incentive on individual moral behavior. It finds that due to the obstacles and lag of behavior information transmission, individuals will make moral decisions according to the state of social network, and a stable social network will help to improve the moral supply level of behavior subjects. This paper then simulates the evolution of group behavior in the context of social network changes and third-party governance intervention in urban-rural transition through agent-based modeling. The simulation results show that when the social network is in different types, there are obvious differences in the moral level and evolution path of individual behavior. In the process of urban-rural transformation, the social network is divided into two parts, which are negative incentives for the lack of reputation mechanism. After the introduction of third-party governance, the behavior evolution of social groups has accelerated significantly, showing a strong corrective effect, but it hasn't significantly improved the average moral level of social groups. The intergenerational evolution of social group behavior and the overall moral level will reach a better condition through precise rewards and punishments and fine governance. research offers an economic explanation from evolutionary perspective for the changes of moral order in the period of urban-rural transformation, and also provides a theoretical support for the refinement of social governance.

Key words: Urban-rural Transformation, Social Network, Moral Behavior Evolution, Simulation

摘要： 本文考虑城乡转型背景下社会网络的信息披露功能,构建个人道德行为决策的理论模型。机制分析发现,囿于行为信息传递障碍和滞后性,个人根据社会网络的状态做出行为决策,稳定的社会网络有助于提升个人行为的道德水平,城乡转型带来社会网络变动及不确定性,降低了个人行为的道德水平。通过主体基模型对群体行为演化的仿真结果表明,社会网络的状态显著影响个人行为的道德水平和演化路径,城乡转型过程中社会网络割裂表现为声誉机制缺失的负向激励,抑制了个人行为道德水平的提升。引入第三方治理后,社会群体的行为演化速度明显加快,显示出强烈的矫正趋势,但并未提高群体行为的平均道德水平。只有进一步增强精准奖惩和精细化治理,社会群体行为的代际演化速度和整体道德水平才会达到更好状态。本研究为城乡转型时期的道德秩序变迁提供了演化视角的经济学解释和社会精准治理的理论支撑。

关键词: 城乡转型, 社会网络, 道德行为演化, 仿真

CLC Number:

F062.6

ZHANG Wenwu. Urban-rural Transformation,Social Network and Moral Behavior Evolution[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2023, 39(3): 103-112.

张文武. 城乡转型、社会网络与道德行为演化[J]. 财经论丛, 2023, 39(3): 103-112.

References

[1]刘守英, 王一鸽. 从乡土中国到城乡中国——中国转型的乡村变迁视角[J]. 管理世界, 2018, (10): 128-146.
[2]樊浩. 中国社会大众伦理道德发展的文化共识——基于改革开放40年持续调查的数据[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019, (8): 24-44.
[3]曾琰. 友善的实践样态及范式变更——从公民道德到社会主义核心价值观[J]. 社会主义研究, 2017, (3): 80-86.
[4]樊浩. 当今中国伦理道德发展的精神哲学规律[J]. 中国社会科学, 2015, (12): 33-50.
[5]Mesterton G. M. Ecotypic Variation in the Asymmetric Hawk-Dove Game: When is Bourgeois an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy?[J]. Evolutionary Ecology, 1992, 6(3): 198-222.
[6]Shayo M. A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class and Redistribution[J]. American Political Science Review, 2009, 103(2): 147-174.
[7]Alexander W. Communication with Tokens in Repeated Games on Networks[J]. Theoretical Economics, 2015, 10(1): 67-101.
[8]周小毛, 何绍辉. 陌生人社会中的道德建设:兼论雷锋精神[J]. 伦理学研究, 2017, (4): 105-109.
[9]Kahan D. M. Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection[J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2013, 8(4): 407-424.
[10]周燕, 郭偲偲, 张麒麟. 内外双向因素与搭便车行为:社会网络的调节作用[J]. 管理科学, 2015, (3): 130-142.
[11]Sharot T., Garrett N. Forming Beliefs: Why Valence Matters[J]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2016, 20(1): 25-33.
[12]Sasaki T., Uchida S. The Evolution of Cooperation by Social Exclusion[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2013, (280): 20122498.
[13]Benabou R., Falk A., Tirole J. Narratives, Imperatives, and Moral Reasoning[R]. IZA Discussion Papers, 2018, No. 11665.
[14]朱勇. 中国古代社会基于人文精神的道德法律共同治理[J]. 中国社会科学, 2017, (12): 160-177.
[15]Griep Y., Germeys L., Kraak J. Unpacking the Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive Work Behavior: Moral Licensing and Temporal Focus[J]. Group and Organization Management, 2021, 46(5): 819-856.
[16]Ali S. N., Miller D. A. Ostracism and Forgiveness[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(8): 2329-2348.
[17]韦倩, 孙瑞琪, 姜树广, 叶航. 协调性惩罚与人类合作的演化[J]. 经济研究, 2019, (7): 174-187.
[18]Abeler J., Nosenzo D., Raymond C. Preferences for Truth-telling[J]. Econometrica, Econometric Society, 2019, 87(4): 1115-1153.
[19]王小章, 冯婷. 从“乡规民约”到公民道德——从国家-地方社群—个人关系看道德的现代转型[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2019, (1): 41-47.
[20]陈思静, 何铨, 马剑虹. 第三方治理惩罚对合作行为的影响:基于社会规范激活的解释[J]. 心理学报, 2015, (3): 389-405.
[21]殷西乐, 李建标, 陈思宇, 刘晓丽, 郝洁. 第三方治理惩罚的神经机制:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, (5): 571-583.
[22]Enke B. Kinship, Cooperation and the Evolution of Moral Systems[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134(2): 953-1019.
[23]孙晓华, 孙瑞, 涂安娜. 网络效应、新兴产业演化与生态位培育——来自电动汽车行业的ABM仿真研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, (11): 1-17.
[24]戴尔阜, 马良, 杨微石, 王亚慧, 尹乐, 童苗. 土地系统多主体模型的理论与应用[J]. 地理学报, 2019, (11): 2260-2272.
[25]董志强, 李伟成. 禀赋效应和自然产权的演化:一个主体基模型[J]. 经济研究, 2019, (1): 182-198.
[26]Khazaii J. Advanced Decision Making for HVAC Engineers[M]. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 102-106.
[27]Wilensky U., Resnick M. Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Perspective to Making Sense of the World[J]. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1999, 8(1): 3-18.
[28]牛贺. 有限理性、规范内化与利他行为:一个演化视角[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (10): 189-199.
[29]Sellnow K., Esbensen K., Cisler M. Social Trust and Reciprocity among Adolescent Girls Exposed to Interpersonal Violence[J]. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2021, 36(21-22): 9977-9995.