The Impact of Incentive Regulation on Green Technology Innovation of High Energy Consumption Enterprises:Evidence from the “National Comprehensive Demonstration Cities of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Fiscal Policy”

Collected Essays on Finance and Economics ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 103-112.

The Impact of Incentive Regulation on Green Technology Innovation of High Energy Consumption Enterprises:Evidence from the “National Comprehensive Demonstration Cities of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Fiscal Policy”

WANG Junhao¹, HUO Yujia², JIN Xuanxuan¹

1. China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018,China;
2. Zhejiang Research Institute of ZUFE-UCASS,Hangzhou 310018,China

Received:2023-01-12 Online:2023-11-10 Published:2023-11-09

激励性管制对高耗能企业绿色技术创新的影响——来自“节能减排财政政策综合示范城市”的证据

王俊豪¹, 霍雨佳², 金暄暄¹

1.浙江财经大学中国政府监管与公共政策研究院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.浙江财经大学—中国社会科学院大学浙江研究院,浙江杭州 310018

通讯作者: 金暄暄(1991—),男,浙江浦江人,浙江财经大学中国政府监管与公共政策研究院助理研究员
作者简介:王俊豪(1956—),男,浙江嵊州人,浙江财经大学中国政府监管与公共政策研究院教授;霍雨佳(1999—),女,山西阳泉人,浙江财经大学—中国社会科学院大学浙江研究院硕士生。
基金资助:
浙江省社科规划项目(20230616-36);国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA111)

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the relevant panel data of 330 prefecture-level administrative regions in China from 2005 to 2022, this paper examines the impact of the incentive regulatory policy of “energy conservation and emission reduction fiscal policy” on the green innovation development of high energy consumption enterprises. The research results indicate that incentive regulation significantly improves the level of green technology innovation in high energy consumption enterprises, mainly manifested in an increase in the number of authorized green patents, invention patents, and utility model patents. Compared with other enterprises, incentive regulation has a significant positive impact on green technology innovation in large enterprises, technology development oriented enterprises, and enterprises that have not obtained any patent authorization before policy implementation. The conclusions of this paper are helpful to expand the institutional motivation of green technology innovation in high energy consumption enterprises from the perspective of incentive regulation, and provide micro-enterprise-level empirical evidence for the evaluation of incentive regulation policies from the perspective of green technology innovation in high energy consumption enterprises. The paper also puts forward the policy enlightenment from the following three aspects: The optimization and perfection of the incentive control policy, the effective play of the dual attributes of the policy and the formulation of the multi-policy convergence operation mechanism.

Key words: Incentive Regulation, High Energy Consumption Enterprises, Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction, Green Technology Innovation

摘要： 本文基于我国330个地级行政区2005—2022年的面板数据,考察“节能减排财政政策”这一激励性管制政策对高耗能企业绿色创新发展的影响。研究结果表明,激励性管制显著提升高耗能企业的绿色技术创新水平,主要表现为企业绿色专利、发明型专利及实用新型专利获得授权的数量增加;与其他企业相比,激励性管制对大型企业、技术研发偏向型企业及政策实施前未获得任何专利授权企业的绿色技术创新具有显著的正向影响。该结论从激励性管制视角进一步拓展高耗能企业绿色技术创新的制度动因,为高耗能企业绿色技术创新视角下激励性管制政策效果评估提供企业层面的微观经验证据,并从激励性管制政策的优化完善、其双重属性的有效发挥及多元政策衔接运行机制的制定三个方面提出政策启示。

关键词: 激励性管制, 高耗能企业, 节能减排, 绿色技术创新

CLC Number:

F426

WANG Junhao, HUO Yujia, JIN Xuanxuan. The Impact of Incentive Regulation on Green Technology Innovation of High Energy Consumption Enterprises:Evidence from the “National Comprehensive Demonstration Cities of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Fiscal Policy”[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2023, 39(11): 103-112.

王俊豪, 霍雨佳, 金暄暄. 激励性管制对高耗能企业绿色技术创新的影响——来自“节能减排财政政策综合示范城市”的证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2023, 39(11): 103-112.

References

[1]韩超, 张伟广, 冯展斌. 环境规制如何“去”资源错配——基于中国首次约束性污染控制的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017, (4): 115-134.
[2]刘红波, 高新珉. 负面舆情、政府回应与话语权重构——基于1711个社交媒体案例的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021, (5): 130-137.
[3]Song M., Zhao X., Shang Y. The Impact of Low-carbon City Construction on Ecological Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Quasi-natural Experiments[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 157(104777).
[4]余泳泽, 林彬彬. 偏向性减排目标约束与技术创新——“中国式波特假说”的检验[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, (11): 113-135.
[5]王杰, 刘斌. 环境规制与企业全要素生产率——基于中国工业企业数据的经验分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (3): 44-56.
[6]Cohen M. A., Tubb A. The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Firm and Country Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis of the Porter Hypothesis[J]. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2018, 5(2): 371-399.
[7]Greenstone M., List J. A., Syverson C. The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Competitiveness of U. S. Manufacturing[Z]. NBER Working Paper, 2012, No. 18392.
[8]Albrizio S., Kozluk T., Zipperer V. Environmental Policies and Productivity Growth: Evidence across Industries and Firms[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2017, (81): 209-226.
[9]张杰, 陈志远, 杨连星, 新夫. 中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估:理论与证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015, (10): 4-17.
[10]许治, 何悦, 王晗. 政府R&D资助与企业R&D行为的影响因素——基于系统动力学研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012, (4): 67-75.
[11]薛飞, 陈煦. 绿色财政政策的碳减排效应——来自“节能减排财政政策综合示范城市”的证据[J]. 财经研究, 2022, (7): 79-93.
[12]王书斌, 徐盈之. 环境规制与雾霾脱钩效应——基于企业投资偏好的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015, (4): 18-30.
[13]安同良, 施浩, Ludovico Alcorta. 中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证——基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2006, (2): 21-30.
[14]冯根福, 郑明波, 温军, 张存炳. 究竟哪些因素决定了中国企业的技术创新——基于九大中文经济学权威期刊和A股上市公司数据的再实证[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (1): 17-35.
[15]Johnstone N., Managi S., Rodriguez M. C. Environmental Policy Design, Innovation and Efficiency Gains in Electricity Generation[J]. Energy Economics, 2017, (63): 106-115.
[16]Li L., Chen J., Gao H. The Certification Effect of Government R&D Subsidies on Innovative Entrepreneurial Firms' Access to Bank Finance: Evidence from China[J]. Small Business Economics, 2019, 52(1): 241-259.
[17]王文涛, 付剑峰, 朱义. 企业创新、价值链扩张与制造业盈利能力——以中国医药制造企业为例[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012, (4): 50-62.
[18]余泳泽, 张先轸. 要素禀赋、适宜性创新模式选择与全要素生产率提升[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (9): 13-31.
[19]王春杨, 兰宗敏, 张超, 侯新烁. 高铁建设、人力资本迁移与区域创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020, (12): 102-120.
[20]郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (9): 98-116.
[21]黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新？——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, (4): 60-73.
[22]李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, (9): 192-208.
[23]Cengiz D., Dube A., Lindner A., Zipperer B. The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-wage Jobs[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134(3): 1405-1454.
[24]Popp D. International Innovation and Diffusion of Air Pollution Control Technologies: The Effects of NO_x and SO₂ Regulation in the U. S., Japan, and Germany[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2006, 51(1): 46-71.