特殊普通合伙制、法制环境与审计保险价值

财经论丛 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 65-73.

特殊普通合伙制、法制环境与审计保险价值

张俊民, 张晓

天津财经大学商学院,天津 300222

收稿日期:2016-06-17 出版日期:2017-09-10 发布日期:2017-09-10
作者简介:张俊民(1960),男,山东济宁人,天津财经大学商学院教授,博士;张晓(1989),女,山东德州人,天津财经大学商学院博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272189)

Limited Liability Partnership, Legal Environment and the Value of Audit Insurance

ZHANG Junmin, ZHANG Xiao

School of Business, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China

Received:2016-06-17 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以2009~2015年中国沪深A股上市公司为样本,实证研究事务所转制对审计收费风险溢价的影响,寻找我国转型经济背景下检验审计保险价值的经验证据。研究发现,事务所转制提高了公司的审计收费风险溢价,但具有时滞效应。进一步地,在法制环境建设水平较高地区,事务所转制后公司的审计收费风险溢价显著增加,而在法制环境建设水平较低地区,事务所转制对审计收费风险溢价没有显著影响。本文对考察中国会计师事务所转制的政策效果具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 事务所转制, 法制环境, 审计保险价值, 审计收费风险溢价

Abstract: Based on a sample of listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2009 to 2015, this paper analyzes the relationship between auditors' organizational transformation and the value of audit insurance, and then tests the effect of auditors' organizational transformation on the risk premium of audit fees. We find that auditors' organizational transformation improves the risk premium of audit fees with a lag effect. We also find that in regions with a better legal environment, auditors' organizational transformation has a positive effect on the risk premium of audit fees. However, in regions with a poor legal environment, auditors' organizational transformation has no significant impact on the risk premium of audit fees. This paper provides new evidence for the effect of auditors' organizational transformation in China.

Key words: Auditors' organizational Transformation, Legal Environment, Value of Audit Insurance, Risk Premium of Audit Fees

中图分类号:

F239.22

张俊民, 张晓. 特殊普通合伙制、法制环境与审计保险价值[J]. 财经论丛, 2017, 33(9): 65-73.

ZHANG Junmin, ZHANG Xiao. Limited Liability Partnership, Legal Environment and the Value of Audit Insurance[J]. , 2017, 33(9): 65-73.

参考文献

[1] Kellogg, R. L. Accounting Activities, Security Prices, and Class Action Lawsuits[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1984, 6(3): 185-204.
[2] Menon, K. and D. D. Williams. The Insurance Hypothesis and Market Prices[J]. Accounting Review, 1994, 69(2): 327-342.
[3] 王春飞, 陆正飞. 事务所“改制”、保险价值与投资者保护[J]. 会计研究, 2014, (5): 81-87, 95.
[4] 刘笑霞. 审计师法律惩戒的影响因素与后果研究评述[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2014, (2): 38-46.
[5] Seetharaman, A., F. A. Gul and S. G. Lynn. Litigation Risk and Audit Fees: Evidence from UK Firms Cross-listed on US Markets[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2002, 33(1): 91-115.
[6] Black, F. and M. Scholes. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81(3): 637-654.
[7] Dye, R. A. Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(5): 887-914.
[8] Brown, D. L., S. Shu and G. M. Trompeter. The Insurance Hypothesis: The Case of KPMG's Audit Clients[Z]. Working Paper, 2008.
[9] Krishnan, J. and J. Krishnan. Litigation Risk and Auditor Resignations[J]. Accounting Review, 1997, 72(4): 539-560.
[10] 伍利娜, 郑晓博, 岳衡. 审计赔偿责任与投资者利益保护——审计保险假说在新兴资本市场上的检验[J]. 管理世界, 2010, (3): 32-43.
[11] 韩晓梅, 周玮. 客户业绩波动与审计风险防范:信息鉴证还是保险功能?[J]会计研究, 2013, (9): 71-77, 97.
[12] 李明辉, 郭梦岚. 注册会计师真的关注审计风险了吗——基于审计定价视角的经验证据[J]. 当代经济科学, 2010, (4): 109-117, 128.
[13] 李江涛, 宋华杨, 邓迦予. 会计师事务所转制政策对审计定价的影响[J]. 审计研究, 2013, (2): 99-105.
[14] 刘行健, 王开田. 会计师事务所转制对审计质量有影响吗?[J]. 会计研究, 2014, (4): 88-94,96.
[15] 余玉苗, 刘颖斐. 注册会计师审计定价模型中的风险溢价及其内在化研究[J]. 会计研究, 2005, (3): 16-21,93.
[16] Simunic, D. A. and M. T. Stein. Impact of Litigation Risk on Audit Pricing: A Review of the Economics and the Evidence[J]. Auditing, University of Waterloo Symposium on Auditing Research, 1996, 15: 119-134.
[17] Simunic, D. A. The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1980, 18(1): 161-190.
[18] 张天舒, 黄俊. 金融危机下审计收费风险溢价的研究[J]. 会计研究, 2013, (5): 81-86, 96.
[19] Francis, J. R. The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1984, 6(2): 133-151.
[20] 李补喜, 王平心. 上市公司董事会特征与审计费用率[J]. 中国会计评论, 2006, (1): 105-118.
[21] 闫焕民, 刘宁, 陈小林. 事务所转制是否影响审计定价策略——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 审计研究, 2015, (5): 93-101.