Basel III净稳定融资比率能否替代存贷比？——来自中国上市银行的经验证据

财经论丛 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 48-58.

Basel III净稳定融资比率能否替代存贷比？——来自中国上市银行的经验证据

李明辉¹, 周边²

1.华东师范大学经济与管理学部,上海 200062;
2.上海财经大学金融学院,上海 200433

收稿日期:2017-03-05 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-01-10
作者简介:李明辉(1984-),男,安徽马鞍山人,华东师范大学经济与管理学部晨晖学者、应用经济学博士后流动站博士后、上海并购金融研究院研究员;周边(1992-),男,安徽六安人,上海财经大学金融学院博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71603085);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2016M600292);中国博士后科学基金第10 批特别资助项目(2017T100280);上海并购金融研究院决策研究资助项目

Can NSFR Replace Loan-to-deposit Ratio？——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of 20 Listed Banks in China

LI Minghui¹, ZHOU Bian²

1.Faculty of Economics and Management , East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;
2.School of Finance,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China

Received:2017-03-05 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于2000~2014年中国20家上市商业银行的微观数据,采用实证分析的方法分别从整体和局部两个维度分析净稳定融资比率能否取代存贷比作为流动性风险监测指标。本文的研究结论表明:(1)从个体来看,20家上市商业银行在两种指标体系下达标率表现存在巨大差异;(2)从商业银行经营实际来看,两套流动性风险监管指标体系对部分银行能得出较为一致的达标率,而对于另外一些银行而言,一致性效果较差;(3)就上市银行整体而言,用净稳定融资比率代替存贷比作为流动性风险的监测指标在某种程度上能起到存贷比作为流动性风险监测指标的效果。最后,文章针对流动性风险监管给出了有益的政策建议。

关键词: 净稳定融资比率, 存贷比, 流动性风险

Abstract: Based on the micro data from 20 listed commercial banks in China during 2000-2014, we empirically answer the following question from two-dimensional analysis (global and local):Can net stable funding ratio replace loan-to-deposit ratio monitor liquidity risk？The findings are as follows: (1) From the individual point of view of 20 listed commercial banks, there is a huge difference between the two different liquidity risk monitoring systems; (2) Some banks could obtain consistent compliance rate from the two different monitoring systems, while others could not; (3) Overallspeaking, the net stable funding ratio can play in a way as liquidity risk monitoring indicators to replace loan-to-deposit ratio as indicators effectively.Based on theses findings,some useful policy recommendations for liquidity risk regulationare offered.

Key words: Net Stable Funding Ratio, Loan-to-deposit Ratio, Liquidity Risk

中图分类号:

F831

李明辉, 周边. Basel III净稳定融资比率能否替代存贷比？——来自中国上市银行的经验证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(1): 48-58.

LI Minghui, ZHOU Bian. Can NSFR Replace Loan-to-deposit Ratio？——An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data of 20 Listed Banks in China[J]. , 2018, 34(1): 48-58.

参考文献

[1] 郑春利.存贷比监管政策分析与改革建议[J]. 经济视角(下),2013, (11) : 119-120 .
[2] 陈涤非,孙小光.当前存贷比监管的合理性分析与改革建议[J]. 金融纵横,2013, (2) : 53-58.
[3] 杨凯生.也谈谈对贷存比指标的看法[N]. 第一财经日报,2014-12-14.
[4] 翟光宇.存贷比监管指标是否应该放松——基于中国上市银行2007~2012年的季度数据分析[J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2013, (6) : 91-101.
[5] 廖岷,冯晖.存贷比、LCR、NSFR的比较分析[R]. 中国金融四十人论坛,2012.
[6] Dietrich A., Hess K., Wanzenried G.The Good and Bad News about the New Liquidity Rules of Basel III in Western European Countries[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014,44 (6): 13-25.
[7] Härle P., Lüders E., Pepanides T., Pfetsch S., Poppensieker T., Stegemann U.Basel III and European Banking: Its Impact, How Hanks might Respond, and the Challenges of Implementation[Z]. McKinsey Working Papers on Risk, 2010, (11).
[8] King M. R.The Basel III Net Stable Funding Ratio and Bank Net Interest Margins[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013,37 (11): 4144-4156.
[9] Allen B., Chan K. K., Milne A., Thomas S.Basel III: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease？[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2012,25: 159-166.
[10] Angelini P., Clerc L., Cúrdia V., Gambacorta L., Gerali A., Locarno A., Motto R., Roeger W., Van den Heuvel S., Vlek J.Basel III: Long-term Impact on Economic Performance and Fluctuations[R]. Available at SSRN 1785522, 2011.
[11] 钟伟,谢婷.巴塞尔协议Ⅲ的新近进展及其影响初探[J]. 国际金融研究,2011, (3): 46-55.
[12] 巴曙松,樊燕然, 朱元倩.巴塞尔协议Ⅲ在欧盟的实施及其对中国的启示[J]. 西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2014, (1): 55-60.
[13] 李明辉,刘莉亚, 黄叶苨.巴塞尔协议Ⅲ净稳定融资比率对商业银行的影响——来自中国银行业的证据[J]. 国际金融研究,2016, (3): 51-62.
[14] 隋洋,白雨石.中资银行应对流动性监管最新要求的策略研究[J]. 国际金融研究,2015, (1): 62-69.
[15] 田娟.第三版巴塞尔协议净稳定融资比率的最新修订及启示[J]. 南方金融,2014, (6): 31-34.
[16] 陆静.巴塞尔协议Ⅲ及其对国际银行业的影响[J]. 国际金融研究,2011, (3): 56-67.
[17] Basel Committee On Banking Supervision. Strengthening the Resilience of the Banking Sector[S]. Consultative Document, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, 2009.
[18] Basel Committee On Banking Supervision. Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems [S]. Consultative Document, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, 2010.
[19] Basel Committee On Banking Supervision. Basel III: The Net Stable Funding Ratio[S]. Consultative Document, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, 2014.
[20] Hong H., Huang J., Wu D.The Information Content of Basel III Liquidity Risk Measures[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2014, (15): 91-111.
[21] Distinguin I., Roulet C., Tarazi A.Bank Regulatory Capital and Liquidity: Evidence from US and European Publicly Traded Banks [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013,37 (9): 3295-3317.
[22]Ötker-Robe O., Pazarbasioglu C., di Perrero A. B., Iorgova S.,Kisinbay T., Le Leslé V., Melo F., Podpiera J., Sacasa N., Santos A.Impact of Regulatory Reforms on Large and Complex Financial Institutions[Z]. International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper, 2010,(11).
[23] Vazquez F., Federico P. M.Bank Funding Structures and Risk: Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis[R]. Available at SSRN 1997439, 2012.
[24] Kapan T., Minoiu C.Balance Sheet Strength and Bank Lending During the Global Financial Crisis[R]. Deutsche Bundesbank,Discussion Paper, 2013,(38).