会计准则变革对跨国直接投资的影响——以我国对外直接投资和外商直接投资为例

财经论丛 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 64-73.

会计准则变革对跨国直接投资的影响——以我国对外直接投资和外商直接投资为例

周芳^1,2, 张先治¹

1.东北财经大学会计学院,辽宁大连 116025;
2.南京审计大学政府审计学院,江苏南京 211815

收稿日期:2018-02-07 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-12
作者简介:周芳(1977-),女,辽宁鞍山人,东北财经大学会计学院博士生;张先治(1957-),男,辽宁瓦房店人,东北财经大学会计学院教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71372068)

The Impact of Accounting Standards Reform on Transnational Direct Investment——Take China's Foreign Direct Investment and Outward Foreign Direct Investment as an Example

ZHOU Fang^1,2, ZHANG Xianzhi¹

1.School of Accounting,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China;
2.School of Government Auditing,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China

Received:2018-02-07 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文主要探究我国在2007年之后采用与国际趋同的企业会计准则(会计准则变革)的宏观经济后果及其作用机理。本文以我国对外直接投资和外商直接投资双向跨国资本流动之和衡量我国与其他国家的跨国直接投资,从理论和实证两方面分析会计准则变革对跨国直接投资是否具有影响以及这种影响是否是通过会计准则可比性的提高来实现的。研究发现:通过会计准则可比性的中介效应检验,会计准则变革通过会计准则可比性的提高促进跨国直接投资的增加。

关键词: 会计准则变革, 可比性, 跨国直接投资, 中介效应

Abstract: This paper mainly explores the macro-economic consequences of the adoption of the international convergence of accounting standards (accounting standards reform) after 2007 in China and its mechanism. It uses China's foreign direct investment and outward foreign direct investment to measure the sum of transnational direct investment between China and other countries,and analyzes, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, whether the accounting standards reform has an impact on transnational direct investment and whether the impact is achieved through the improvement of accounting standards comparability in china. The paper finds that the accounting standard reform has significantly increased transnational direct investment in China. Further research on the mechanism of the impact through mediation effect test of accounting standards comparability indicates that the accounting standards reform can promote the increase of transnational direct investment through the accounting standards comparability in China.

Key words: Accounting Standards Reform, Comparability, Transnational Direct Investment, Mediation Effect

中图分类号:

F230

周芳, 张先治. 会计准则变革对跨国直接投资的影响——以我国对外直接投资和外商直接投资为例[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(11): 64-73.

ZHOU Fang, ZHANG Xianzhi. The Impact of Accounting Standards Reform on Transnational Direct Investment——Take China's Foreign Direct Investment and Outward Foreign Direct Investment as an Example[J]. , 2018, 34(11): 64-73.

参考文献

[1] 孙铮,刘浩.国际财务报告准则带来了什么:全球发现[J]. 会计研究,2013, (1):13-19.
[2] 张先治,于悦. 会计准则变革、企业财务行为与经济发展的传导效应和循环机理[J]. 会计研究,2013, (10):3-12.
[3] Brüggemann U.,Hitz J.,Sellhorn T.. Intended and Unintended Consequences of Mandatory IFRS Adoption:A Review of Extant Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research[J]. European Accounting Review,2013,22(1):1-37.
[4] De George,Emmanuel,Li,Xi,Shivakumar,Lakshmanan. A Review of the IFRS Adoption Literature[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2016,21(3):898-1004.
[5] 陈信元,何贤杰,田野. 新会计准则研究:分析框架与综述[J]. 中国会计评论, 2011,9(2):141-158.
[6] 张先治,晏超. 会计准则变革的非预期效应理论框架构建[J]. 会计研究, 2015, (2):3-12.
[7] Amiram,D.,Financial Information Globalization and Foreign Investment Decisions[J]. Journal of International Accounting Research,2012,11(2):57-81.
[8] Beneish,M. D.,Miller,B. P. and Yohn,T. L.,Macroeconomic Evidence on the Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Equity and Debt Markets[J]. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy,2015,34(1):1-27.
[9] Chen C.,Young D. and Zhuang Z.,Externalities of Mandatory IFRS Adoption:Evidence from Cross-border Spillover Effects of Fnancial Information on Investment Efficiency[J]. The Accounting Review,2013,88(3):881-914.
[10] Gordon,Lawrence A.,Loeb,Martin P. and Zhu Wenjie,The Impact of IFRS Adoption on Foreign Direct Investment[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2012,31(4):374-398.
[11] M'arquez-Ramos,L.,European Accounting Harmonization:Consequences of IFRS Adoption on Trade in Goods and Foreign Direct Investments[J]. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade,2011,47(5):42-57.
[12] Dunning,J.,Institutional Reform,Foreign Direct Investment,and European Transition Economies[M]. New York: International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century (Ed,Grosse,R.),Cambridge University Press, 2005, 49-78.
[13] Choi,F.,Frost,C. A. and Meek,G. K. International Accounting. 4^thedition[M]. Prentice Hall, 2001.
[14] Ports,R. and Rey,H.,The Determinants of Cross-border Equity Flows[J]. Journal of International Economics,2005,65(2):269-296.
[15] 袁知柱,吴粒. 会计信息可比性研究评述及未来展望[J]. 会计研究,2012,(9):9-15,96.
[16] 周芳. 会计准则变革对QFII投资的影响研究——基于会计准则可比性的视角[J]. 山西财经大学学报,2015,37(12):103-112.
[17] Bae,K.,Tan,H. and Michael W.,International GAAP Differences:the Impact on Foreign Analysts[J]. The Accounting Review,2008,83(3):593-628.
[18] Yu,G. and Wahid,A. S.,Accounting Standards and International Portfolio Holdings[J]. The Accounting Review,2014,89(5):1895-1930.
[19] Gehrig,T. An Information Based Explanation of the Domestic Bias in International Equity Investment[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics,1993,(95):97-109.
[20] Chen C. J.,Ding Y.,Xu B. Convergence of Accounting Standards and Foreign Direct Investment[J]. The International Journal of Accounting,2014,49(1):53-86.
[21] French,K. R. and Poterba,J. M. Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets[J]. The American Economic Review,1991,81(2):222-226.
[22] 温忠麟,刘红云,侯杰泰. 调节效应和中介效应分析[M]. 北京:教育科学出版社, 2012. 72-76.
[23] Sobel M. E. Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models[M]. Washington,DC:American Sociological Association,1982. 290-312.
[24] Mackinnon,D. P.,Lockwood,C. M. and Hoffman,J. M. A New Method to Test for Mediation[J]. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research,Park City,UT, 1998.