税收凸显性改变了消费选择么?——来自一项情景模拟实验的证据

财经论丛 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 21-30.

税收凸显性改变了消费选择么?——来自一项情景模拟实验的证据

薛畅

中国人民大学财政金融学院,北京 100872

收稿日期:2019-03-28 出版日期:2020-02-10 发布日期:2020-03-20
作者简介:薛畅(1991-),女,内蒙古赤峰人,中国人民大学财政金融学院博士生。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目(19BJY225)

Does Tax Salience Change Consumer Choice?——Evidence from a Natural Experiment

XUE Chang

School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2019-03-28 Online:2020-02-10 Published:2020-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于行为经济学相关理论,构建理论模型分析框架,并使用情景模拟实验数据,分析税收凸显性对消费选择行为的影响,实验数据的倾向得分匹配实证分析结果表明:税收凸显性的存在改变了消费者的消费选择,显著降低了消费者的购买量和购买金额,且这种效应还会因商品类别和商品折扣的不同而存在异质性。因此,政府在制定税收政策时,应充分考虑消费者对税收政策的反应程度,优化税制结构,以更好地实现社会福利的最大化。

关键词: 税收凸显性, 消费选择, 自然实验

Abstract: Based on the theories of Behavioral Economics, this paper builds a theoretical model analysis framework and uses the natural experiment data to analyze how tax salience influences the consumer choice behavior. Results of the propensity score matching empirical analysis of the experiment data show that the existence of tax salience changes the consumer behavior and significantly reduces the consumer's purchases and costs, and this effect varies with different types and different discount of the goods. Therefore, the government should fully consider consumers' response to tax policies when formulating tax policies, and optimize the tax structure so as to better realize the maximization of the social welfare.

Key words: Tax Salience, Consumer Choice Behavior, Nature Experiment

中图分类号:

F810.42

薛畅. 税收凸显性改变了消费选择么?——来自一项情景模拟实验的证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2020, 36(2): 21-30.

XUE Chang. Does Tax Salience Change Consumer Choice?——Evidence from a Natural Experiment[J]. , 2020, 36(2): 21-30.

参考文献

[1] 安东尼·B·阿特金森,约瑟夫·E·斯蒂格里茨.公共经济学[M]. 蔡江南,徐斌,邹华明,译.上海:三联书店上海分店,上海人民出版社,2011.
[2] Chetty R. The Simple Economics of Salience and Taxation[Z]. NBER Working Paper,2009.
[3] Chetty R., Adam Looney, Kory Kroft.Saliance and Taxation:Theory and Evidence[J]. American Economic Rview,2009,99(4):1145-1177.
[4] Chetty R., Saez E. Dividend and Corporate Taxation in an Agency Model of the Firm[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,2010,2(3):1-31.
[5] Puviani A. Teoria Della Illusione Nelle Entrate Pubbliche[M]. Italy: Unione Tipografica Cooperativa, 1897.
[6] Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[7] Kahneman D. Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice[R]. Prize Lecture, 2002,(12).
[8] 丹尼尔·卡尼曼. 思考快与慢[M]. 胡晓姣,李爱民,何梦莹,译.北京:中信出版社,2012.
[9] Simon H. A. Rational Choice and the Struture of the Environment[J]. Psychological Review,1956,63:129-138.
[10] Simon H.A. Rationality in Psychology and Economics[J]. Journal of Business, 1986:S209-S224.
[11] Russell S. W., John Deighton, Vicki G. Morwitz. Choice in Computer-Mediated Environments[J]. Marketing Letters, 1997: 287-296.
[12] Finkelstein A. E-ztax: Tax Salience and Tax Rates[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009,124(3):969-1010.
[13] Naomi E. Feldman, Bradley J. Ruffle. The Impact of Tax Exclusive and Inclusive Prices on Demand[Z]. Working Paper, 2012.
[14] Martin Fochmann, Joachim Weimann.The Effects of Tax Salience and Tax Experience on Individual Work Efforts in a Framed Field Experiment[Z]. Discussion Paper, 2011.
[15] Dmitry Taubinsky, Alex Rees-Jones. Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2018,(10):2462-2496.
[16] 陈力朋,郑玉洁,徐建斌. 消费税凸显性对居民消费行为的影响——基于情景模拟的一项实证研究[J]. 财贸经济,2016,(7):34-49.
[17] Goldin J., Homonoff T. Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Cigarette Tax Salience and Regressivity[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,2013:302-336.
[18] Blumkin T., Ruffle B. J., Ganun Y. Are Income and Consumption Taxes Ever Really Equivalent? Evidence from a Real-Effort Experiment with Real Goods[J]. European Economic Review, 2012, 56(6): 1200-1219.
[19] 刘华,陈力朋,徐建斌. 税收凸显性对居民消费行为的影响——以个人所得税、消费税为例的经验分析[J]. 税务研究,2015,(3):22-27.
[20] Rosenbaum P.R., Rubin D.B. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects[J]. Biometrika, 1983,(4):41-55.