财政补贴、税收优惠与企业自主创新:政策选择与运用

财经论丛 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 33-43.

财政补贴、税收优惠与企业自主创新:政策选择与运用

王春元¹, 于井远²

1.浙江财经大学财政税务学院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.广东财经大学粤港澳大湾区创新竞争力研究院,广东广州 510320

收稿日期:2020-03-20 出版日期:2020-10-10 发布日期:2020-10-14
作者简介:王春元(1980-),男,湖北团风人,浙江财经大学财政税务学院副教授,博士;于井远(1984-),男,河南淮阳人,广东财经大学粤港澳大湾区创新竞争力研究院讲师,博士。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJC630148);浙江省自然科学基金一般项目(LY18G030030)

Subsidy, Tax Incentives and Independent Innovation of Enterprises: Policy Choice and Application

WANG Chunyuan¹, YU Jingyuan²

1. School of Public Finance and Taxation,Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China;
2. Research Institute of Innovation Competitiveness of Guangdong,Hongkong and Macao Bay Area, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China

Received:2020-03-20 Online:2020-10-10 Published:2020-10-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： R&D在经济可持续发展中扮演关键角色,财政政策是被广泛使用激励企业R&D创新的公共政策之一。基于企业自选择视角,探讨企业选择与运用不同政策工具(财政补贴和税收优惠),将有利于捕捉企业的决策过程并分析其影响因素,为优化财政政策提供微观层面的参考。本研究利用企业层面的微观调查数据,构建双变量Probit模型分析企业如何选择并运用财政补贴和税收优惠这两种政策工具,揭示其与市场失灵的联系及作用机制。研究表明,财政补贴政策和税收优惠具有较强的互补性,资金充足或融资约束压力小的大企业偏向选择税收优惠政策,融资约束压力大的中小企业偏爱选择财政补贴政策;独占性程度高的企业偏向选择税收优惠政策,相反,若创新产品被迅速模仿和复制,企业预期不会有显著利润流,则趋向选择财政补贴政策。另外,企业的存续期间、区位(高新区)、高新技术属性及人力资本占比均显著影响企业政策选择。

关键词: 财政补贴, 税收优惠, 融资约束, 知识外溢, 双变量Probit模型

Abstract: R&D plays a key role in economic sustainability, and fiscal policy is one of the widely used public policies that inspire corporate R&D innovation. Based on the perspective of enterprise self-selection, exploring the choice and application of different policy instruments (financial subsidies and tax incentives) will help capture the decision-making process of enterprises and analyze their influencing factors, and provide a micro-level reference for optimizing fiscal policy. This study uses the micro-survey data at the enterprise level to construct a bivariate Probit model to analyze how companies choose and use financial subsidies and tax incentives to reveal their linkages with market failures and mechanisms. that fiscal subsidy policies and tax incentives have strong complementarities. Large enterprises with sufficient funds or financing constraints are more inclined to choose tax preferential policies; small and medium-sized enterprises with financing restrictions prefer financial subsidies. Companies with higher levels of preference prefer tax incentives. On the contrary, if innovative products are quickly imitated and replicated, companies expect that they will not have significant profit streams, and they tend to choose fiscal subsidies. In addition, the duration of the company, the location (high-tech zone), high-tech properties and the proportion of human capital all significantly affect the choice of corporate policies.

Key words: Subsidy, Tax Incentives, Financing Constraints, Knowledge Spillover, Bivariate Probit Model

中图分类号:

F812.42

王春元, 于井远. 财政补贴、税收优惠与企业自主创新:政策选择与运用[J]. 财经论丛, 2020, 36(10): 33-43.

WANG Chunyuan, YU Jingyuan. Subsidy, Tax Incentives and Independent Innovation of Enterprises: Policy Choice and Application[J]. , 2020, 36(10): 33-43.

参考文献

[1] Romer D. Staggered Price Setting with Endogenous Frequency of Adjustment[J]. Economics Letters, 1990, 32(3):205-210.
[2] Segerstrom P. S., Anant T. C. A., Dinopoulos E. A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle[J]. American Economic Review, 1990, 80(5):1077-1091.
[3] Aghion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction[J]. Econometrica, 1992, 60(2):323-351.
[4] Link, Albert N., Scott, John T. Bending the Arc of Innovation: Public Support of R&D in Small, Entrepreneurial Firms[Z]. Uncg Economics Working Papers, 2013.
[5] Busom I., Corchuelo B., Martínez-Ros, Ester. Tax Incentives or Subsidies for Business R&D?[J]. Small Business Economics, 2014, 43(3):571-596.
[6] Rupeika-Apoga, R., Saksonova, S.SMEs' Alternative Financing: The Case of Latvia[J]. European Research Studies Journal, 2018,21(3):43-52.
[7] Solovjova, I.,Rupeika-Apoga, R., Romanova, I. Competitiveness Enhancement of International Financial Centres[J]. European Research Studies Journal, 2018,21(1): 5-17.
[8] Baldacchino, P.J., Portelli, J., Grima, S. The Implications and Relevance of a Tax Exemption for Co-operatives: The Case of a Small European State[J]. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, 2019,7(3): 116-132.
[9] Takalo T., Tanayama T., Toivanen O. Market Failures and the Additionality Effects of Public Support to Private R&D: Theory and Empirical Implications[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2013, 31(5):634-642.
[10] Wu, A. The Signal Effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does Ownership Matter?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017,117: 339-345.
[11] David, P., Hall, B. Heart of Darkness: Modelling Public-private Funding Interactions Inside the R&D Black Box[J]. Research Policy, 2000,29(2):1165-1183.
[12] Czarnitzki, D.& Lopes-Bento C.Value for Money? New Microeconometric Evidence on Public R&D Grants in Flanders[J]. Research Policy, 2013,42(1): 76-89.
[13] Neicu D. Evaluating the Effects of an R&D Policy Mix of Subsidies and Tax Credits[J]. Management and Economics Review, 2019, 4: 192-216.
[14] Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M. Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2011,40(5): 702-713.
[15] Koga T. Firm Size and R&D Tax Incentives[J]. Technovation, 2003, 23(7):643-648.
[16] Lokshin B., Mohnen P. Measuring the Effectiveness of R&D Tax Credits in the Netherlands[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2008, 2007-025.
[17] Hong C., Lee J. D. Macroeconomic Effects of R&D Tax Credits on Small and Medium Enterprises[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2016, 28(4):467-481.
[18] 潘孝珍. 高新技术企业所得税名义税率优惠的科技创新激励效应[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报,2017,(6):103-111.
[19] Busom I., Corchuelo B., Martínez-Ros E. Participation Inertia in R&D Tax Incentive and Subsidy Programs[J]. Small Business Economics, 2017:1-25.
[20] Choi J., Lee J. Repairing the R&D Market Failure: Public R&D Subsidy and the Composition of Private R&D[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(8):1465-1478.
[21] Kobayashi Y. Effect of R&D Tax Credits for SMEs in Japan: A Microeconometric Analysis Focused on Liquidity Constraints[J]. Small Business Economics, 2014,42(2):311-327.
[22] Rao. Do Tax Credits Stimulate R&D Spending? The Effect of the R&D Tax Credit in Its First Decade[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2016, 140:1-12.
[23] 唐书林,肖振红,苑婧婷. 上市公司自主创新的国家激励扭曲之困——是政府补贴还是税收递延?[J]. 科学学研究,2016,(5):744-756.
[24] 胡凯,吴清. 税收激励、制度环境与企业研发支出[J]. 财贸经济,2018,(1):38-53.
[25] Keuschnigg C., Ribi E. Profit Taxation and Finance Constraints[Z]. Working Papers, 2010, 24(1):683-695.
[26] Howell A. Firm R&D, Innovation and Easing Financial Constraints in China: Does Corporate Tax Reform Matter? [J]. Research Policy, 2016, 11-22.
[27] Alessandro S., Francesco V. R&D Tax Incentives in EU Countries: Does the Impact Vary with Firm Size?[J]. Small Business Economics, 2018.
[28] Czarnitzki D., Ebersberger B., Fier A. The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2007, 22(7):1347-1366.
[29] Gelabert L., Fosfuri A., Tribó J. A. Does the Effect Public of Support for R&D Depend on the Degree of Appropriability? [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2009, 57(4):736-767.
[30] 邱洋冬. 选择性产业政策如何影响企业绩效——来自高新技术企业资质认定的经验证据[J]. 广东财经大学学报,2020,35(3):70-83.