股票流动性与企业脱实向虚:促进还是抑制——基于博彩文化的视角

财经论丛 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 37-47.

股票流动性与企业脱实向虚:促进还是抑制——基于博彩文化的视角

胡妍¹, 向海凌², 吴非³

1.广东金融学院金融与投资学院,广东广州 510521;
2.暨南大学经济学院,广东广州 510632;
3.广东金融学院行为金融与区域实验室,广东广州 510521

收稿日期:2020-03-14 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-03-17
通讯作者: 向海凌(1991-),女,江西九江人,暨南大学经济学院博士生
作者简介:胡妍(1989-),女,湖南长沙人,广东金融学院金融与投资学院讲师,博士;吴非(1989-),男,广东汕头人,广东金融学院行为金融与区域实验室助理研究员,博士。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科青年项目(18YJC790052);广东省软科学研究项目(2019A101002077);广州市哲学社会科学发展规划羊城青年学人课题(2020GZQN44);广州市哲学社会科学发展规划共建课题(2020GZJD02)

Stock Liquidity and Corporate Financialization: Promote or Inhibit——Based on the Perspective of Gaming Culture

HU Yan¹, XIANG Hailing², WU Fei³

1. School of Finance and Investment, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China;
2. School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
3. Behavioral Finance and Regional Laboratory, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China

Received:2020-03-14 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-03-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文利用2007~2017年的面板数据,研究股票流动性对企业金融化的影响。与既有研究不同,本文不仅考虑“股票流动性—企业金融化”之间的关系,还开创性地将地方文化因素引入上述框架。研究发现,股票流动性驱动了企业金融化水平提升,这种关系在较长时期内都成立,而且随着企业金融化水平的提高,股票流动性对企业金融化的推波助澜作用更加明显。博彩文化是影响股票流动性与企业金融化关系的重要因素。在博彩文化氛围较强的地区,股票流动性会通过融资约束、信息水平乃至媒体关注等渠道驱动企业金融化水平进一步上升,而外部的机构投资者持股和内部的控制程度强化是克服上述问题的有效手段。有鉴于此,要抑制企业的脱实向虚倾向,不仅需要充分考虑资本市场股票流动性的影响,还必须将文化因素纳入分析框架中,并结合完善的内外部治理机制方能实现。

关键词: 股票流动性, 博彩文化, 金融化, 内部控制, 机构持股

Abstract: This paper uses the panel data from 2007 to 2017 to study the impact of stock liquidity on corporate financialization. Different from the existing research, this paper not only considers the “stock liquidity—enterprise financialization” relationship, but also introduces local cultural factors into the above framework. The study finds that stock liquidity drives up the financial level of enterprises, and this relationship can last a long time. With the improvement of corporate financialization, stock liquidity plays a more significant role in boosting corporate financialization. The gambling culture is an important factor affecting the relationship between stock liquidity and corporate financialization. In areas with strong gambling culture, stock liquidity drive the financialization of enterprises to a higher level through financing constraints, information level and market media attention. It is found that the external institutional investors' shareholding and the internal control are effective means to overcome the above problems. In view of this, in order to curb the tendency of enterprises to shift its focus from the real economy to the virtual economy, not only the impact of stock market liquidity, but also the influence of the local culture should be taken into consideration. It is suggested that more efforts should be put into improving the internal and external governance mechanisms of enterprises.

Key words: Stock Liquidity, Gaming Culture, Financialization, Internal Control, Institutional Shareholding

中图分类号:

F832.5

胡妍, 向海凌, 吴非. 股票流动性与企业脱实向虚:促进还是抑制——基于博彩文化的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2021, 37(2): 37-47.

HU Yan, XIANG Hailing, WU Fei. Stock Liquidity and Corporate Financialization: Promote or Inhibit——Based on the Perspective of Gaming Culture[J]. , 2021, 37(2): 37-47.

参考文献

[1] Orhangazi Ö. Financialisation and Capital Accumulation in the Non-financial Corporate Sector: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation on the US Economy: 1973-2003[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2008,(6): 863-886.
[2] 张成思,张步昙.中国实业投资率下降之谜:经济金融化视角[J]. 经济研究,2016,(12):32-46.
[3] 杜金岷,任玎.新三板企业股票流动性是否抑制了技术创新?——基于委托代理问题和经济政策不确定性的实证与解读[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(6):107-118.
[4] Fang Vivian W. ,Tian Xuan ,Tice Sheri.Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?[J]. Journal of Finance, 2014,69(5): 2085-2125.
[5] Graham J. R., Harvey C. R., Rajgopal S. The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 40(1-3): 3-73.
[6] Tian X., Wang T. Y. Tolerance for Failure and Corporate Innovation[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2011,(1): 211-255.
[7] Bhide A. The Hidden Costs of Stock Market Liquidity[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 34(1):31-51.
[8] 吴非,向海凌.企业金融化影响技术创新的期限结构异质性研究——理论模型推演与中国经验证据[J]. 当代经济管理,2020,(2):84-91.
[9] 赵奇锋,赵文哲,卢荻,等.博彩与企业创新:基于文化视角的研究[J]. 财贸经济,2018,(9):122-140.
[10] Chen Y., Podolski E. J., Rhee S. G. et al. Local Gambling Preferences and Corporate Innovative Success[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2014, 49(1): 77-106.
[11] 林煜恩,江义升,郑家兴,等.博彩行为对公司资本结构的影响:基于两岸三地的实证研究[J]. 产经评论,2016,(5):141-160.
[12] 王红建,李茫茫,汤泰劼.实体企业跨行业套利的驱动因素及其对创新的影响[J]. 中国工业经济,2016,(11):73-89.
[13] 邓超,夏文珂,陈升萌.非金融企业金融化:“股价稳定器”还是“崩盘助推器”[J]. 金融经济学研究,2019,(3):120-136.
[14] 温忠麟.张雷,侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报,2004,(5):614-620.
[15] 杨亚平,吴祝红.中国企业对外直接投资如何影响生产率?——基于中介效应模型和投资动机的实证研究[J]. 广西财经学院学报,2019,(1):101-112.
[16] Hadlock C. J., Pierce J. R. New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the Kz Index[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(5): 1909-1940.
[17] 戚聿东,张任之.金融资产配置对企业价值影响的实证研究[J]. 财贸经济,2018,(5):38-52.
[18] 杨道广,陈汉文,刘启亮.媒体压力与企业创新[J]. 经济研究,2017,(8):125-139.
[19] 苏冬蔚,熊家财.股票流动性、股价信息含量与CEO薪酬契约[J]. 经济研究,2013, (11):56-70.