员工建言行为对工作绩效的作用机制——基于内隐追随理论的研究

财经论丛 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 103-112.

• 工商管理 • 上一篇

员工建言行为对工作绩效的作用机制——基于内隐追随理论的研究

马贵梅, 袁明月, 马冰

西安工程大学管理学院,陕西西安 710048

收稿日期:2022-03-29 出版日期:2023-12-10 发布日期:2023-12-19
通讯作者: 马冰(1984—),女,陕西澄城人,西安工程大学管理学院副教授,博士。
作者简介:马贵梅(1979—),女,安徽泗县人,西安工程大学管理学院副教授,博士;袁明月(1997—),女,河南商丘人,西安工程大学管理学院硕士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71802156;72102175);西安工程大学研究生创新基金项目(chx2022013)

The Mechanism of Emplyee Voice Behavior Influencing Job Performance: A Study Based on Implicit Followership Theory

MA Guimei, YUAN Mingyue, MA Bing

School of Management,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an 710048,China

Received:2022-03-29 Online:2023-12-10 Published:2023-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于内隐追随理论,本文探讨不同类型的建言行为如何通过领导内隐追随原型对领导-成员交换关系及员工绩效产生差异化作用。通过对409份样本数据进行分析,结果发现:促进性建言与工作绩效正相关;抑制性建言与工作绩效呈倒U型关系;领导-成员交换关系分别在促进性建言与工作绩效的线性关系、抑制性建言与工作绩效的倒U型关系中起中介作用;包容型领导调节了两类建言行为与领导-成员交换的关系。研究结果揭示出建言行为对个体工作绩效作用结论不一致的原因,拓展了建言行为研究的理论视角。

关键词: 建言行为, 工作绩效, 内隐追随理论, 领导-成员交换关系, 包容型领导

Abstract: Based on the implicit followership theory,this paper discusses whether,why and when different types of voice behavior conform to the leader implicit followership prototype,and then have a differentiated effect on the leader-member exchange relationship and employee performance.By analyzing the data of 409 samples from multiple enterprises,this study finds that promotive voice is positively related to job performance whereas prohibitive voice has an inverted U-shaped effect on job performance.Leader-member exchange not only plays a mediating role in the linear relationship between promotive voice and job performance,but also plays an inverted U-shaped relationship between prohibitive voice and job performance.Inclusive leadership moderates the relationship between two types of voice behavior and leader-member exchange.The research results reveal the reasons for the inconsistent conclusions of the effect of voice behavior on individual job performance,and expand the theoretical perspective of voice behavior research.

Key words: Voice Behavior, Job Performance, Implicit Followership Theory, Leader-Member Exchange, Inclusive Leadership

中图分类号:

F272.91

马贵梅, 袁明月, 马冰. 员工建言行为对工作绩效的作用机制——基于内隐追随理论的研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2023, 39(12): 103-112.

MA Guimei, YUAN Mingyue, MA Bing. The Mechanism of Emplyee Voice Behavior Influencing Job Performance: A Study Based on Implicit Followership Theory[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2023, 39(12): 103-112.

参考文献

[1]许龙,高素英,刘宏波,等.员工建言内涵、维度、动因及作用机理研究——基于整合视角[J].软科学,2016,(9):71-74.
[2]李方君,郑粉芳,杨倩怡,等.员工建言行为的结果及其调节机制[J].心理科学进展,2018,(4):710-718.
[3]唐汉瑛,龙立荣.员工建言促进工作绩效:谦卑领导的调节作用[J].管理科学,2019,(1):91-100.
[4]Lin S.H.,Johnson R.E.A Suggestion to Improve a Day Keeps Your Depletion Away:Examining Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Behaviors with in a Regulatory Focus and Ego Depletion Framework[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2015,100(5):1381-1397.
[5]王健菊,杨均,邓志华.追随原型—特质匹配对员工追随与退缩行为的影响机制研究[J].贵州财经大学学报,2021,(2):62-71.
[6]彭坚,曹兵兵.追随者主动工作行为的上行影响:内隐追随视角[J].心理科学进展,2021,(6):967-977.
[7]Carsten M.K.,Uhl-bien M.,West B.J.,et al.Exploring Social Constructions of Followership:Qualitative Study[J].Leadership Quarterly,2010,21(3):543-562.
[8]Liang J.,Farh C.I.C.,Farh J.L.Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice:A Two-Wave Examination[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,5(1):71-92.
[9]李方君,钟旭朋.促进型和抑制型建言的差异[J].心理科学进展,2020,(11):1939-1952.
[10]王磊,王泽民.领导积极内隐追随对员工创造力的影响机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,(10):119-137.
[11]颜静,张旭,邵芳.员工挑战型组织公民行为与主管绩效评价——主管的组织承诺的调节作用[J].管理评论,2017,(4):134-142.
[12]Fuller B.,Marler L.E.,Hester K.,et al.Leader Reactions to Follower Proactive Behavior:Giving Credit When Credit is Due[J].Human Relations,2015,68(6):879-898.
[13]王艳子,田雅楠.包容型领导对员工建设性越轨行为的激发机理研究[J].外国经济与管理,2019,(3):54-69.
[14]王冬冬,钱智超.员工建言行为影响授权型领导的作用机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,(2):129-145.
[15]孔茗,钱小军.被领导者“看好”的员工其行为也一定好吗？内隐追随对员工行为的影响[J].心理学报,2015,(9):1162-1171.
[16]李方君,祁婷婷.员工建言能提高工作绩效吗？建言采纳与自我效能感的作用[J].中国人力资源开发,2017,(8):71-82.
[17]张炳涛,卿涛,杨付,等.抑制性建言:影响因素与实施效果[J].心理科学,2019,(5):1180-1185.
[18]Li A.N.,Liao H.,Tangirala S.,et al.The Content of the Message Matters:The Differential Effects of Promotive and Prohibitive Team Voice on Team Productivity and Safety Performance Gains[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2017,102(8):1259-1270.
[19]Mawritz M.B.,Greenbaum R.L.,Butts M.M.,et al.I just can't Control Myself:A Self-regulation Perspective on the Abuse of Deviant Employees[J].Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(4):1482-1503.
[20]Jehn K.A.,Mannix E.A.Dynamic Nature of Conflict:A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(8):238-251.
[21]罗文豪,刘东,章凯.追随研究的演进及其在中国情境下的未来发展方向探索[J].南开管理评论,2021,(2):214-226.
[22]Cheong M.,Yammarino F.J.,Dionne S.D.,et al.A Review of the Effectiveness of Empowering Leadership[J].The Leadership Quarterly,2019,30(1):34-58.
[23]Lawler E.J.,Thye S.R.,Yoon J.Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange[J].American Journal of Sociology,2000,106(3):616-657.
[24]Deluga R.J.,Perry J.T.The Role of Subordinate Performance and Ingratiation in Leader-member Exchanges[J].Group and Organization Management,1994,19(1):67-86.
[25]王雁飞,朱瑜.组织领导与成员交换理论研究现状与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2006,(1):30-38.
[26]祝振兵,罗文豪,曹元坤.领导会视谁为圈内人？内隐追随与领导-成员交换关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,(11):140-146.
[27]Chaleff I.The Courageous Follower:Standing up to and for our Leaders[M].San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler,1995:43-87.
[28]杨春江,冯秋龙,田子州.变革型领导与员工任务绩效:主动性人格和领导-成员交换的作用[J].管理工程学报,2015,(1):39-46.
[29]Graen G.B.,Uhi-bien M.Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 years:Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective[J].Leadership Quarterly,1995,6(2):219-247.
[30]辛迅,苗仁涛.工作重塑对员工创造性绩效的影响——一个有调节的双中介模型[J].经济管理,2018,(5):108-122.
[31]Whiting S.W.,Maynes T.D.,Podsakoff N.P.,et al.Effects of Message,Source and Context on Evaluations of Employee Voice Behavior[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97(1):159-182.
[32]Carmeli A.,Ziv R.Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace:The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety[J].Creativity Research Journal,2010,22(3):250-260.
[33]任孝鹏,王辉.领导-部属交换(LMX)的回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2005,(6):788-797.
[34]张瑞颖,张永军,李永鑫.新瓶旧酒或推陈出新:包容性领导是一种独立的领导类型吗？[J].心理科学,2018,(5):136-141.
[35]陈胜军,殷新峰.中国房地产行业知识员工组织支持感及其与工作绩效关系的实证研究[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2009,(5):69-74.
[36]Stolzenberg R.M.The Measurement and Decomposition of Causal Effects in Nonlinear and Nonadditive Models[J].Sociological Methodology,1980,11:459-488.
[37]彭伟,朱晴雯,乐婷.包容型领导影响员工创造力的双路径——基于社会学习与社会交换的整合视角[J].财经论丛,2017,(10):90-97.
[38]Liang H.L.,Yeh T.K.The Effects of Employee Voice on Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction:The Mediating role of Leader-Member Exchange[J].Management Decision,2020,58(3):569-582.
[39]马贵梅,马红,张旭,等.基于扎根理论的员工建言质量研究:内容结构、测量与作用机制[J].管理评论,2022,(12):227-240.

员工建言行为对工作绩效的作用机制——基于内隐追随理论的研究

The Mechanism of Emplyee Voice Behavior Influencing Job Performance: A Study Based on Implicit Followership Theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宋锟泰, 张正堂, 赵李晶. 领导者的时间提醒真的能够提升员工绩效吗？——一个被调节的双中介效应模型[J]. 财经论丛, 2019, 35(8): 84-94.
[2]	马鹏,蔡双立. 家长式领导对员工建言行为激励内化机制研究——中庸思维调节下的跨层次分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(7): 88-96.
[3]	彭伟, 朱晴雯, 乐婷. 包容型领导影响员工创造力的双路径——基于社会学习与社会交换的整合视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2017, 33(10): 90-97.