税制结构优化如何影响产业转型升级？

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于2011—2019年我国272个地级市数据,本文从服务产业、数字产业、绿色产业等层面综合构建我国现代化产业体系评价指标,运用空间杜宾模型实证考察税制结构优化对城市产业转型升级的影响。研究发现,税制结构优化显著促进了当地城市的产业转型升级。从空间溢出角度来看,税制结构优化会产生负向溢出效应,抑制邻近城市产业转型升级,但是在城市群内部其溢出效应为正。机制分析表明,税制结构优化会通过促进收入分配公平和维持商品价格稳定来促进产业转型升级。此外,本文还发现,税制结构优化从数字化发展、科技创新发展以及城乡融合发展方面促进产业转型升级,提高个人所得税比重对产业转型升级的促进作用比提高企业所得税的促进作用更强。本文从空间溢出角度为深化税制结构改革提供新视角,为促进产业转型升级、建设现代化产业体系给予政策参考。

关键词: 产业转型升级, 税制结构, 直接税, 空间溢出, 资源配置

Abstract: Based on data of 272 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2019, this article comprehensively constructs evaluation indicators for China's modern industrial system from the perspectives of service industry, digital industry, and green industry. The spatial Durbin model is used to empirically examine the impact of tax system structure optimization on urban industrial transformation and upgrading. The research results indicate that optimizing the tax system structure significantly promotes the industrial transformation and upgrading of local cities. From the perspective of spatial spillover, optimizing the tax system structure will generate negative spillover effects to inhibit the transformation and upgrading of neighboring cities, but there is heterogeneity in its spillover effects within urban agglomerations. Mechanism analysis shows that optimizing the tax system structure will promote industrial transformation and upgrading by promoting fair income distribution and maintaining stable commodity prices. Heterogeneity analysis finds that optimizing the tax system structure has a stronger promoting effect on the transformation and upgrading of digital industries, service industries, and urban-rural integration. The article provides a new perspective for deepening the reform of the tax system structure from the perspective of spatial spillover, and provides policy references for promoting industrial transformation and upgrading, and building a modern industrial system.

Key words: Industrial Transformation and Upgrading, Taxation Structure, Proportion of Direct Tax, Spatial Spillover, Resource Allocation

中图分类号:

F713.55

陈滔, 倪志良, 刘辰. 税制结构优化如何影响产业转型升级？[J]. 财经论丛, 2024, 40(7): 38-47.

CHEN Tao, NI Zhiliang, LIU Chen. How does the Optimization of Tax System Structure Affect Industrial Transformation and Upgrading?[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2024, 40(7): 38-47.

参考文献

[1]高培勇. 论完善税收制度的新阶段[J]. 经济研究, 2015, (2): 4-15.
[2]高培勇. 从结构失衡到结构优化——建立现代税收制度的理论分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2023, (3): 4-25, 204.
[3]吕冰洋, 张兆强. 中国税收制度的改革: 从嵌入经济到嵌入社会[J]. 社会学研究, 2020, (4): 152-173, 244-245.
[4]郭庆旺, 吕冰洋. 论税收对要素收入分配的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011, (6): 16-30.
[5]苏国灿, 童锦治, 魏志华, 等. 中国间接税税负归宿的测算:模型与实证[J]. 经济研究, 2020, (11): 84-100.
[6]卢洪友, 杜亦譞. 中国财政再分配与减贫效应的数量测度[J]. 经济研究, 2019, (2): 4-20.
[7]Angelopoulos K., Malley J., Philippopoulos A . Tax Structure, Growth, and Welfare in the UK[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2012, 64(2): 237-258.
[8]Suzuki, K. Corporate Tax Cuts in a Schumpeterian Growth Model with an Endogenous Market Structure[J]. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2022, 24(4): 324-347.
[9]Stoilova D. Tax Structure and Economic Growth: Evidence from the European Union[J]. Contaduría y Administración, 2017, 62(3): 1041-1057.
[10]沈坤荣, 余红艳. 税制结构优化与经济增长动力重构[J]. 经济学家, 2014, (10): 51-59.
[11]于井远. 税制结构优化与地区经济增长质量——基于包容性全要素生产率的视角[J]. 经济评论,2022, (2): 36-50.
[12]Oyinlola M. A., Adedeji A. A. Tax Structure, Human Capital, and Inclusive Growth: A Sub-Saharan Africa Perspective[J]. Journal of Public Affairs, 2022, (4): e2670.
[13]蒋震, 苏京春, 杨金亮. 数字经济转型与税制结构变动[J]. 经济学动态, 2021, (5): 115-128.
[14]郭杰, 李涛. 中国地方政府间税收竞争研究——基于中国省级面板数据的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2009, (11): 54-64.
[15]Deng Y., You D., Wang J. Research on the Nonlinear Mechanism Underlying the Effect of Tax Competition on Green Technology Innovation-An Analysis Based on the Dynamic Spatial Durbin Model and the Threshold Panel Model[J]. Resources Policy, 2022, 76: 102545.
[16]Mirrlees J. A. An Exploration of the Theory of Optimal Taxation[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1971, 38(2): 175-208.
[17]龙小宁, 朱艳丽, 蔡伟贤, 等. 基于空间计量模型的中国县级政府间税收竞争的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2014, (8): 41-53.
[18]Bellemare M. F., Masaki T., Pepinsky T. B. Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effect[J]. Journal of Politics, 2017, 79(3):949-963.
[19]Han C., Phillips P. GMM Estimation for Dynamic Panels with Fixed Effects and Strong at Unity[J]. Econometric Theory, 2010, 26(1): 119-151.
[20]余泳泽, 孙鹏博, 宣烨. 地方政府环境目标约束是否影响了产业转型升级?[J]. 经济研究, 2020, (8): 57-72.
[21]袁航, 朱承亮. 国家高新区推动了中国产业结构转型升级吗[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (8): 60-77.
[22]汪克亮, 赵斌, 丁黎黎. 经济赶超、结构转型与绿色全要素生产率[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2021, (1): 15-26.
[23]赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, (10): 65-76.
[24]张晓波. 中国区域创新创业指数[DB/OL]. 北京大学开放研究数据平台, 2019[2024-01-28]. https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/PEFDAS.
[25]郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, (4): 1401-1418.
[26]段禄峰. 我国城乡二元经济结构测度研究[J]. 生态经济, 2016, (3): 33-39.
[27]徐维祥, 李露, 周建平, 等. 乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, (9): 2044-2062.
[28]孙英杰, 林春. 税制结构变迁与中国经济增长质量——对地方政府税收合意性的一个检验[J]. 经济科学, 2018, (5): 5-16.
[29]陈滔, 倪志良. 税制结构、税收凸显性与城乡居民消费差距——基于279个地级市数据的实证考察[J]. 当代财经, 2023, (4): 29-40.
[30]邵帅, 张可, 豆建民. 经济集聚的节能减排效应: 理论与中国经验[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35 (1): 36-60, 226.
[31]田卫民. 中国基尼系数计算及其变动趋势分析[J]. 人文杂志, 2012, (2): 56-61.