财经论丛 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 47-58.

• 金融与投资 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技金融政策与新质生产力发展

黄徐亮1, 徐海东2   

  1. 1.中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院, 北京 102488;
    2.中国社会科学院财经战略研究院, 北京 100006
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-26 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 徐海东(1991—),男,江苏宿迁人,中国社会科学院财经战略研究院助理研究员。
  • 作者简介:黄徐亮(2000—),男,安徽庐江人,中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    中国社会科学院创新工程项目(2024CJY0105)

Science and Technology Finance Policy and New Quality Productive Forces Development

HUANG Xuliang1, XU Haidong2   

  1. 1. School of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China;
    2. Institute of Financial and Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100006, China
  • Received:2024-06-26 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-13

摘要: 以科技金融体制构建推动新质生产力发展是经济高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点。本文根据生产力理论和新质生产力内涵构建了中国城市新质生产力评价指标体系,测算了城市新质生产力发展指数,匹配2009—2021年城市面板数据,采用渐进双重差分法探讨了科技金融政策对新质生产力的影响及其作用路径。实证研究发现,科技金融政策显著促进城市新质生产力发展。路径研究发现,科技金融政策对新质生产力的影响机制可以概括为技术进步效应、技术效率提升效应和规模效率提升效应,即科技金融政策通过降低要素搜寻成本、优化投入产出效率、强化协同合作以及促进知识溢出,最终促进了新质生产力发展水平的提升。进一步分析发现,科技金融政策的城市生产力发展效应存在明显的营商环境、资源错配和发展能级差异。应深化金融供给侧结构性改革,找准科技与金融的结合点,不断提升对新质生产力的服务质效。

关键词: 科技金融政策, 新质生产力, 金融供给侧结构性改革, 高质量发展

Abstract: Finance is the bloodstream of the national economy, an essential component of the country's core competitiveness, and is correlated with the overall situation of Chinese-style modernization. Against the backdrop of the new round of scientific and technological revolution and the deepening of industrial transformation, fully exerting real economy of financial services and subsequently developing the new quality productive forces constitute the internal requirements for promoting the high-quality development of the domestic economy and coping with external risks and challenges. This paper clarifies the impact of science and technology finance policy on the development of new quality productive forces, which holds great practical significance for enhancing the system of financial support for sci-tech innovation and activating the potential of finance to enable high-quality development.
Promoting the development of new quality productive forces through the construction of science and technology financial system is the inherent requirement and important focus of high-quality economic development. Based on the theory of productivity and the connotation of new quality productive forces, this paper constructs the new quality productivity development index of Chinese cities. After matching it with the panel data of prefecture-level and the related cities from 2009 to 2021, this paper employs the Generalized Difference-in-Difference method to investigate the influence and its action of the policy of “promoting the pilot integration of science and technology and finance” on the new quality productive forces. The study discovers that the policy has significantly facilitated the improvement of new quality productive forces in the pilot cities. The above conclusions are well substantiated after the validity test, transformation of the core explanatory variable and explained variable, control variable, instrumental variable method, dual machine learning method, and exclusion of other policy influences are carried out. This is of considerably practical and theoretical significance for exerting the productive forces development momentum of the science and technology finance strategy. From the perspective of total factor productivity improvement, this paper further deliberates on the mechanism of the policy to promote technological progress, enhance technical efficiency and scale efficiency. The path analysis reveals that science and technology finance policy gradually gives rise to new industries, new models, and new driving forces by reducing the cost of factor search, optimizing the efficiency of input transfer, strengthening cooperation, and promoting knowledge spillover, ultimately facilitating the development of urban new quality productive forces.
The heterogeneity analysis in this paper shows that the effects of the combination of technology and finance policies are different in cities with different business environments, different degrees of capital mismatch, and different levels of development. We should deepen the financial supply-side structural reform, identify the combination point of science and technology and finance so as to constantly improve the quality and efficiency of services for new quality productive forces. Based on the above analysis, this paper offers the following policy suggestions.

Key words: Science and Technology Finance Policy, New Quality Productive Forces, Financial Supply-Side Structural Reform, High-quality Development

中图分类号: