财经论丛 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 54-64.

• 金融与保险 • 上一篇    下一篇

长期护理保险能促进家庭消费吗?——基于相对剥夺的微观视角

黄俊铭1, 于新亮2   

  1. 1.南京大学政府管理学院, 江苏 南京 210023;
    2.山东财经大学保险学院, 山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-09 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 于新亮(1987—),男,辽宁北票人,山东财经大学保险学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 作者简介:黄俊铭(1996—),男,四川攀枝花人,南京大学政府管理学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72274107);山东省泰山学者工程专项经费资助(tsqn202312226);山东省高等学校青创科技支持计划(2022RW044)

Can Long-term Care Insurance Boost Household Consumption? A Micro Perspective Based on Relative Deprivation

HUANG Junming1, YU Xinliang2   

  1. 1. School of Government, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2. School of Insurance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2024-10-09 Published:2025-11-11

摘要: 利用2011—2020年五期CHARLS数据构建包含多时点双重差分的Tobit模型实证检验长期护理保险对家庭消费相对剥夺的政策效应和作用路径。研究发现,与未参保家庭相比,长期护理保险显著降低了参保家庭的消费相对剥夺指数。长期护理保险呈现出明显的异质性政策效果,家庭特征方面,对于老人中、重度失能,年龄在60岁及以上,非农业户籍的家庭作用更大;给付方式方面,混合给付方式的长期护理保险的作用更强。机制分析结果表明,长期护理保险主要通过促进中、低消费家庭子女外出就业和降低中、低消费家庭的预防性储蓄两条路径降低家庭的消费相对剥夺水平。以上研究结论对健全长期护理保险制度、维护社会公平正义、助力共同富裕目标的实现具有重要意义。

关键词: 共同富裕, 长期护理保险, 家庭消费相对剥夺, 多时点双重差分

Abstract: Using five periods of CHARLS data from 2011 to 2020, this paper empirically examines the policy effects and pathways of long-term care insurance on households' relative deprivation of consumption by constructing a Tobit model containing Time-varying DID. The findings show that long-term care insurance significantly reduces the consumption relative deprivation index of insured households compared with uninsured households. And long-term care insurance presents significantly heterogeneous policy effects. In terms of family characteristics, the effects are greater for families with moderate and severe incapacitation of elderly family members, aged 60 or above, and non-agricultural household registration. In terms of payment methods, the effects of long-term care insurance with mixed payment methods is stronger. The results of the mechanism analysis show that long-term care insurance mainly reduces the relative deprivation of consumption of households through two paths: promoting the employment of children of low and medium-consumption households and reducing the precautionary savings of low and medium-consumption households. The above findings are of great significance to the soundness of the long-term care insurance system, the maintenance of social justice and the realization of the goal of “common prosperity”.

Key words: Common Prosperity, Long-term Care Insurance, Household Consumption Relative Deprivation, Time-varying DID

中图分类号: