财经论丛 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 31-42.

• 数字经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能产学研协同网络的结构特征与形成机制——基于创新链三环节的比较分析

韩家彬1, 冉颢琦1, 刘光彦2   

  1. 1.辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院,辽宁 葫芦岛 125105;
    2.辽宁大学国际经济政治学院,辽宁 沈阳 110136
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-21 出版日期:2026-06-10 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 刘光彦(1963—),男,山东青岛人,辽宁大学国际经济政治学院教授。
  • 作者简介:韩家彬(1978—),男,山东泰安人,辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院教授;冉颢琦(1995—),男,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(25BKX038)

Structural Characteristics and Formation Mechanisms of Industry-University-Research Collaboration Networks in Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Analysis Based on Three Stages of the Innovation Chain

HAN Jiabin1, RAN Haoqi1, LIU Guangyan2   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China;
    2. School of International Economics and International Relations, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China
  • Received:2025-12-21 Online:2026-06-10 Published:2026-06-08

摘要: 从创新链视角剖析人工智能产学研协同网络的结构性瓶颈及其形成机制,对提升产业创新体系效能、培育新质生产力具有重要意义。本文以工业机器人作为人工智能在制造业应用的典型样本,基于2008—2024年多源数据,分别构建科学、技术与商业化三环节产学研协同网络,运用社会网络分析法与指数随机图模型分析其结构特征与形成机制。研究发现:产业创新链呈现“宽入口、窄通道”的非均衡格局,科学协同网络具有高度内聚的“小世界”特征,技术协同网络呈碎片化结构,商业化协同网络则表现为依赖少数平台型节点的脆弱架构,且各环节间衔接性弱;创新主体沿创新链呈现出“学研主导—企业主导—企业核心”的角色演进路径;网络形成机制存在显著的环节异质性,即度数连接偏好在科学环节驱动网络由扩散转向集聚,在技术环节强化分散化趋势,在商业化环节则降低分散化倾向;主体类型匹配在科学环节为同质协同状态,在技术与商业化环节则转为异质互补;三角传递闭合与创新能力作为贯穿全程的核心力量,具有结构性凝聚力与创新吸引力,持续促进协同关系的形成。本文从结构与机制双重维度揭示了三环节人工智能产学研协同网络的非对称演化规律与衔接瓶颈,为提升创新链运行效率与推进差异化环节治理提供了实证依据。

关键词: 人工智能, 创新链, 产学研协同网络, 指数随机图模型, 工业机器人

Abstract: Analyzing the structural bottlenecks and formation mechanisms of the industry-university-research (IUR) collaboration network in artificial intelligence (AI) from an innovation chain perspective is of great significance for enhancing the efficiency of the industrial innovation system and cultivating new quality productive forces. Using the industrial robot industry as a typical sample of AI applications in manufacturing, this paper constructs IUR collaboration networks across three stages—science, technology, and commercialization respectively, based on multi-source data from 2008 to 2024. It employs social network analysis (SNA) and exponential random graph models (ERGM) to analyze their structural characteristics and formation mechanisms. The findings reveal that the industrial innovation chain presents an unbalanced pattern characterized by a “wide entry but narrow passage”. Specifically, the scientific collaboration network exhibits highly cohesive “small-world” characteristics, the technological network displays a fragmented structure, and the commercialization network manifests as a fragile architecture reliant on a few platform-based hub nodes, with weak connectivity between stages. Innovation actors follow a role evolution path along the innovation chain, transitioning from “academia/research-led” to “enterprise-led” and further to “enterprise-core”. The network formation mechanisms exhibit significant stage heterogeneity: degree-based attachment drives the scientific network from diffusion towards clustering, reinforces the decentralization trend in the technological network, and reduces the decentralization tendency in the commercialization network. Actor type matching shows a homophilous synergy state in the scientific stage but shifts to heterophilous complementarity in the technology and commercialization stages. Triadic closure and innovation capability, as core forces running through the entire process, possess structural cohesion and innovation appeal, continuously promoting the formation of collaborative relationships. This paper reveals the asymmetric evolution patterns and connection bottlenecks of the three-stage AI IUR collaboration network from the dual dimensions of structure and mechanism, providing empirical evidence for improving the operational efficiency of the innovation chain and promoting differentiated stage-specific governance.

Key words: Artificial Intelligence, Innovation Chain, Industry-University-Research Collaboration Network, Exponential Random Graph Model, Industrial Robot

中图分类号: