Environmental policy, Anti-pollution Effort Degree and Ecological Environment Quality—Simulation Analysis Based on Three-sector DSGE Model

Abstract

Abstract: This paper build a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium(DSGE) model containing environmental policy factors, to research the dynamic effects of environmental policy, government spending and environment consumer preferences on macro economy, especially for the actual carbon emissions and ecological environment quality, and analysis the transmission mechanism of measures. The study showed that: (1) Improving environmental protection technology can reduce the actual carbon emissions and emission reductions, improve the quality of the ecological environment effectively with economic growth. (2) Levying the carbon tax and improving the environment consumer preferences can significantly improve the quality of environment, but have a certain negative effects on economic growth. (3) The government spending of pollution treatment can significantly reduce carbon emissions and improve the environment quality, but has the negative effects on macroeconomic in a long term. Adjusting the government spending conversion coefficient of pollution treatment can significantly improve the effectiveness of government spending measures. In short, the environmental protection technology and pollution spending are the key to sustain economic growth and environmental quality coordinated development. Enhancing the technology research level and increasing the pollution regulation intensity will be the policy guidance's reference point at the present stage.

Key words: Environmental Policy, Anti-Pollution Effort Degree, Environmental Quality, Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model

摘要： 本文通过构建包含环保政策因素的三部门动态随机一般均衡(DSGE)模型,研究环保政策、政府治污支出及环境消费偏好等措施对宏观经济的动态效应,尤其是对实际碳排放量和生态环境质量的影响,并在此基础上分析各项措施的传导机制。研究发现:(1)环保技术改善能够在保持经济增长的基础上,显著降低碳排放,提高环境质量;(2)征收碳税以及提升环境消费偏好均能够显著改善环境质量,但对经济增长存在一定的负效应;(3)政府治污支出能够显著降低碳排放量和提高环境质量,但中长期内会对宏观经济产生负效应,通过调整政府治污支出转化系数,能够显著提高政府治污支出措施的有效性。总体上,环保技术与治污支出是保持经济增长与环境质量协调发展的关键,提升厂商的环保技术研发水平与加大治污力度应是现阶段政策制定的参考重点。

关键词: 环保政策, 治污努力程度, 环境质量, DSGE模型

CLC Number:

F015

WU Xiaoli. Environmental policy, Anti-pollution Effort Degree and Ecological Environment Quality—Simulation Analysis Based on Three-sector DSGE Model[J]. , 2017, 33(4): 101-112.

武晓利. 环保政策、治污努力程度与生态环境质量——基于三部门DSGE模型的数值分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2017, 33(4): 101-112.

References

[1]Pizer W. A. The Optimal Choice of Climate Change Policy in the Presence of Uncertainty[J]. Resource & Energy Economics, 1999, 21(3-4): 255-287.
[2]Bovenberg A. L., Goulder L. H. Environmental Taxation and Regulation[J]. Handbook of Public Economics, 2001, 3: 1471-1545.
[3]Bárcena-Ruiz J. C., Garzón M. B. Mixed Oligopoly and Environmental Policy[J]. Spanish Economic Review, 2006, 8(2): 139-160.
[4]Kato K. Can Allowing to Trade Permits Enhance Welfare in Mixed Oligopoly?[J]. Journal of Economics, 2006, 88(88): 263-283.
[5]Kato K. Emission Quota Versus Emission Tax in a Mixed Duopoly[J]. Environmental Economics & Policy Studies, 2011, 13(1): 43-63.
[6]Wang L. F. S., Wang J. Environmental Taxes in a Differentiated Mixed Duopoly[J]. Economic Systems, 2009, 33(4): 389-396.
[7]Wissema W., Dellink R. A CGE Analysis of the Impact of a Carbon Energy Tax on the Lrish Economy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(61): 671-683.
[8]Fried S., Johnson J., Morris S. D. Environmental Policy and Short Run Macroeconomic Tradeoffs[R]. San Diego: University of California, 2013.
[9]Annicchiarico B., Dio F. D. Environmental Policy and Macroeconomic Dynamics in a New Keynesian Model[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2013, 69(1): 1-21.
[10]Helfand G. E. Standards versus Standards: The Effects of Different Pollution Restrictions[J]. American Economic Review, 1991, 81(3): 622-634.
[11]Ebert U. Relative standards: A Positive and Normative Analysis[J]. Journal of Economics, 1998, 67(1): 17-38.
[12]Angelopoulos K. What is the Best Environmental Policy? Taxes, Permits and Rules under Economic and Environmental Uncertainty[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2010, (3): 35-42.
[13]Mandell S. Optimal Mix of Emissions Taxes and Cap-and-Trade[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2008, 56(2): 131-140.
[14]Mackenzie I. A., Ohndorf M. Cap-and-trade, Taxes, and Distributional Conflict[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2012, 63(1): 51-65.
[15]杨翱, 刘纪显, 吴兴弈. 基于DSGE模型的碳减排目标和碳排放政策效应研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014, (7): 1452-1461.
[16]徐文成, 薛建宏, 毛彦军. 宏观经济动态性视角下的环境政策选择——基于新凯恩斯DSGE模型的分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, (4): 101-109.
[17]姚昕, 刘希颖. 基于增长视角的中国最优碳税研究[J]. 经济研究, 2010, (11): 48-58.
[18]张友国等. 征税标准与碳关税对中国经济和碳排放的潜在影响[J]. 世界经济, 2015, (2): 167-192.
[19]石敏俊等. 碳减排政策: 碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之?[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, (9): 9-19.
[20]魏庆坡. 碳交易与碳税兼容性分析——兼论中国减排路径选择[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, (5): 35-43.
[21]郑丽琳, 朱启贵. 技术冲击、二氧化碳排放与中国经济波动——基于DSGE模型的数值模拟[J]. 财经研究, 2012, (7): 37-47.
[22]齐结斌, 胡育蓉. 环境质量与经济增长——基于异质性偏好和政府视界的分析[J]. 中国经济问题, 2013, (5): 28-38.
[23]查建平. 环境规制与工业经济增长模式——基于经济增长分解视角的实证研究[J]. 产业经济研究, 2015, (3): 92-101.
[24]Annicchiarico B., Dio F. D. Environmental Policy and Macroeconomic Dynamics in a New Keynesian Model[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2015, 69(1): 1-21.
[25]陈学彬, 杨凌, 方松. 货币政策效应的微观基础研究——我国居民消费储蓄行为的实证分析[J]. 复旦学报, 2005, (1): 42-54.
[26]黄赜琳. 中国经济周期特征与财政政策效应——一个基于三个部门RBC模型的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2005, (6): 27-39.
[27]Fuentes-Albero C. Financial Frictions, the Financial Immoderation, and the Great Moderation. Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, 2009.
[28]胡永刚, 郭新强. 内生增长、政府生产性支出与中国居民消费[J]. 经济研究, 2012, (9): 57-71.
[29]Hanson G. D. Indivisible Labor and the Business Cycle[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2010, 16(3): 309-327.
[30]朱军. 基于DSGE模型的“污染治理政策”比较与选择——针对不同公共政策的动态分析[J]. 财经研究, 2015, (2): 41-53.
[31]黄勇峰, 任若恩, 刘晓生. 中国制造业资本存量永续盘存法估计[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2002, (2): 377-396.
[32]王玉凤, 刘树林. 财政支出结构对居民消费的动态影响——基于DSGE的实证分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, (2): 300-307.
[33]Economides G., Philippopoulos A. Growth Enhancing Policy is the Means to Sustain the Environment[J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2008, 11(1): 207-219.
[34]Smets F., Wouters R. Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach[J]. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(3): 586-606.
[35]Gerali A., Neri S., Sessa L, et al. Credit and Banking in a DSGE Model of the Euro Area[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010, 42(s1): 107-141.
[36]Khan H., Tsoukalas J. The Quantitative Importance of News Shocks in Estimated DSGE Models[J]. Journal of Money Credit & Banking, 2012, 44(8): 1535-1561.