Does Listed Companies's Related Party Guarantee Increase Corporate Value?——Empirical Evidence from Shanghai & Shenzhen Stock Market

›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 77-85.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Does Listed Companies's Related Party Guarantee Increase Corporate Value?——Empirical Evidence from Shanghai & Shenzhen Stock Market

XU Pan^1,2

1. School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China
2. Nanhu College,Jiaxing University,Jiaxing 314001,China

Received:2016-11-19 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2017-07-10

上市公司提供关联担保增加了公司价值吗？——基于沪深上市公司的数据检验

徐攀^1,2

1. 南京大学商学院,江苏南京 210093
2. 嘉兴学院南湖学院,浙江嘉兴 314001

作者简介:徐攀(1987),女,浙江嘉兴人,南京大学商学院博士生,嘉兴学院南湖学院讲师。
基金资助:
国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目(13BGL048)

Abstract

Abstract: Related party guarantee is part and parcel of corporate financing. Based on the sample data from 2006 to 2014 concerning the related party guarantees of 1118 companies listed on Shanghai & Shenzhen Stock Exchange, this paper conducts a research on the relationship between the related party guarantee and the corporate value in the hope of maximizing the corporate value. The analysis result shows that there is always a negative correlation between the related party guarantee and the corporate value,whatever kinds of types or industries the companies belong to. There is not any positive correlation relationship between the related party guarantee and the corporate value.

Key words: listed Company, Related Party Guarantee, Corporate Value, Company Type

摘要： 关联担保是公司日常融资活动的重要部分,了解关联担保与公司价值的关系有助于实现公司价值最大化。关联担保有可能促使担保双方融资效率的提升从而增加上市公司的价值,也有可能沦为控股股东损害中小股东利益和公司价值的隐蔽手段。本文以2006年至2014年发生关联担保的1118家沪深上市公司为样本,从公司性质和产业等角度实证研究关联担保与公司价值的关系,结果表明:不论何种性质或产业的公司,其关联担保与公司价值均显著负相关。本文研究结论对规范我国上市公司担保行为具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 上市公司, 关联担保, 公司价值, 公司性质

CLC Number:

F832. 4

XU Pan. Does Listed Companies's Related Party Guarantee Increase Corporate Value?——Empirical Evidence from Shanghai & Shenzhen Stock Market[J]. , 2017, 33(7): 77-85.

徐攀. 上市公司提供关联担保增加了公司价值吗？——基于沪深上市公司的数据检验[J]. 财经论丛, 2017, 33(7): 77-85.

References

[1] Johnson,S.,La Porta,R.,F. Lopez-De-Silanes,A. Shleifer.Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review,2000,(90):22-27.
[2] Kohlbeck,M.,B.Mayhew,Agency Costs,Contracting,and Related Party Transactions[Z]. University of Wisconsin Working Paper,2004.
[3] Du J.,Y. Dai. Ultimate Corporate Owner-ship Structures and Capital Structures:Evidence from East Asian Economies[J]. Corporate Governance,2005,13(1):60-71.
[4] Bai,Y. X.,B. X. Lin,Y. P. Wang,and L. S. Wu. Corporate Ownership,Debt,and Expropriation: Evidence from China[J]. China Journal of Accounting Studies,2013,1(1):13-31.
[5] 贺雪迎. 我国上市公司的担保风险及其防范初探[J]. 财会月刊,2003,(13):11-12.
[6] 马亚军,韩文明. 上市公司国有资产价值流失分析[J]. 中国工业经济,2003,(5):71-78.
[7] 刘小年,郑仁满. 公司业绩、资本结构与对外信用担保[J]. 金融研究,2005,(4):155-164.
[8] 王力军. 金字塔控制、关联交易与公司价值——基于我国民营上市公司的实证研究[J]. 证券市场导报,2006,(2):18-24.
[9] 高雪,宋顺林.掏空、财富效应与投资者保护——基于上市公司关联担保的经验证据[J].中国会计评估,2007,(1):21-42.
[10] 宋力,孙宏鑫. 上市公司财务特征与关联担保研究[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(1):62-65.
[11] 陆正华,钟婉怡. 关联担保上市公司隧道效应的存在性与实施路径[J]. 现代财经,2011,(9):19-27.
[12] 高洁. 关联交易对企业价值的影响——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 税务与经济,2008,(5):12-16.
[13] 王德武,钟富胜. 公司治理、关联担保与公司价值研究[J]. 财会月刊,2008,(35):3-5.
[14] 王芳,周红. 担保方式效应与独立审计需求——基于中国债券市场的研究[J]. 会计研究,2015,(7):71-78,97.

Does Listed Companies's Related Party Guarantee Increase Corporate Value?——Empirical Evidence from Shanghai & Shenzhen Stock Market

上市公司提供关联担保增加了公司价值吗？——基于沪深上市公司的数据检验

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	SHEN Liang, CHEN Yuanyuan, WANG Xiaotong, WANG Yuyan. Government Contingent Liability of China's State-controlled Listed Company:A Size Measurement [J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2023, 39(3): 25-34.
[2]	WANG Man, CHEN Zhenhong, MA Ying. Ultimate Controller's Foreign Residency Right and Corporate Risk-taking: Empirical Evidence from A-share Listed Private Companies [J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2021, 37(9): 71-81.
[3]	ZHOU Chang, CAI Haijing, LIU Meijuan. Research on Enterprise Financial Effects of the Carbon Emission Trading——Based on the “Porter Hypothesis” & PSM-DID Test [J]. , 2020, 36(3): 68-77.
[4]	ZHANG Wen, ZHANG Sheng, CHEN Siyu. The Types of Market and Post-earnings-announcement Drift: Based on a Comparison Between A-share and B-share in China [J]. , 2018, 34(6): 65-75.
[5]	. Political connection and family involvement in board of director of Private listed companies -----An empirical analysis based on the private benefit of control [J]. , 2013, 29(3): 62-68.