Reevaluation of Exploitation of FDI Policy under the Framework of Open Innovation

›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 12-21.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Reevaluation of Exploitation of FDI Policy under the Framework of Open Innovation

ZHENG Feihu¹, NIU Zhiwei², CAI Hongbo¹

1.Business school, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2.Industrial Research Institute, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China

Received:2019-01-18 Online:2020-01-10 Published:2020-01-15

开放式创新框架下对外资利用政策的重新评价

郑飞虎¹, 牛志伟², 蔡宏波¹

1.北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京 100875;
2.首都经贸大学产业研究院,北京 100070

通讯作者: 牛志伟(1971-),首都经济贸易大学产业研究院研究员
作者简介:郑飞虎(1974-),男,江西上饶人,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院副教授,博士生导师;蔡宏波(1982-),男,河南开封人,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71572017;71202029);北京市社科基金项目(14JGB049)

Abstract

Abstract: This paper, based on the framework of open innovation, uses the theory of institutional logics to investigate the institutional environment transition related to FDI Policy in the past 40 years in order to explain the different performances of FDI inflow at different stages of the institution development and try to dig out the relevant tactics for the promotion of ODI tide. The study on IT contracts transaction dataset by MNCs in China from 2001 to 2011 finds that the past 40 years has witnessed two sequent periods of different dominant logics (from closed innovation to open innovation) which have produced the opposing effects on the performance of the introduction of foreign technology by domestic enterprises. Under the mode of open innovation, there lies the new mechanism and solution for the introduction of high quality FDI, but its effect is greatly influenced by such factors as transaction opportunities, partner's capabilities, and the institutional level of the market etc. The above findings provide new horizontal perspectives in the strategic development of “OBOR” and “Going abroad” by Chinese firms.

Key words: Institutional Logics, FDI Exploitation, Closed Innovation, Open Innovation

摘要： 本文基于开放式创新研究框架,运用制度逻辑理论对中国过去近40年引资发展的政策(制度)环境进行考察,借以总结不同制度发展阶段外资引进技术绩效的差异动因,并由此探析国内引资经验对中国企业当下大规模走出去的借鉴意义。利用2001~2011年IT业跨国公司在华技术交易的混合截面数据研究发现:中国以往引资历经封闭式创新与开放式创新两个阶段的制度逻辑变化,并对内资企业的技术绩效产生了截然不同的影响。在开放式创新模式下,利用高质量外资存在新的实现机制与途径,但其绩效受到交易机会、交易者能力与市场制度化水平等因素的重要影响。上述结论对于中国政府当下更好推进“一带一路”及“走出去”的策略发展提供了有意义的借鉴。

关键词: 制度逻辑, 外资利用, 封闭式创新, 开放式创新

CLC Number:

ZHENG Feihu, NIU Zhiwei, CAI Hongbo. Reevaluation of Exploitation of FDI Policy under the Framework of Open Innovation[J]. , 2020, 36(1): 12-21.

郑飞虎, 牛志伟, 蔡宏波. 开放式创新框架下对外资利用政策的重新评价[J]. 财经论丛, 2020, 36(1): 12-21.

References

[1] 李晓华. 对加入WTO后“以市场换技术”的思考[J]. 中国工业经济,2004,(4):21-26.
[2] 李国学.“从以市场换技术”到“以制度促创新”[J]. 研究与探讨,2014,(10):30-37.
[3] 谢建国. 市场竞争、东道国引资政策与跨国公司的技术转移[J]. 经济研究,2007,(6):87-97.
[4] 赵佩华. 论“以市场换技术” ——基于演化博弈论的视角[J]. 汕头大学学报,2010,(3):73-78.
[5] 仲伟周,邢治斌. 我国制造业“以市场换技术”有效性分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2012,(12):62-70.
[6] 李翀.以市场能够换技术吗？——我国提供科学技术水平的路径分析[J]. 经济社会体制比较,2014,(5):12-19.
[7] 张岩贵. “以市场换技术”辨析[J]. 南开管理评论,1997,(4):9-11.
[8] Friedland, Roger and Alford, R. Robert. Bring Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions, in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Walter. W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. 232-263.
[9] Thornton P. H., Ocasiow, Lounsbury M.The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture,Structure and Process[M]. London: Oxford University Press,2012.
[10] Lounsbury M.Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Direction in the Institutional Analysis of Practice[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2008,33(4/5):349-361.
[11] Purdy J. M., Grayb.Conflicting Logics,Mechanisms of Diffusion,and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009,52 (2):355-380.
[12] Henry Chesbrough. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology[M]. Harvard Business School Press,2003.
[13] 邵敏,刘重力. 外资进入与技能溢价——兼论我国FDI技术外溢的偏向性[J]. 世界经济研究,2011,(1):67-74.
[14] 陈柳.长三角地区的FDI技术外溢、本土创新能力与经济增长[J]. 世界经济研究,2007,(1):60-67.
[15] Henry Chesbrough. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape[M]. Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
[16] Kuemmerle W. The Driver of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999,30 (3):1-24.
[17] XH. Quan, H. Chesbrough. Hierarchical Segmentation of R&D Process and Intellectual Property Protection: Evidence from Multinational R&D Laboratories in China[J]. IEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2010,(1):9-21.
[18] 郑飞虎, 常磊. 跨国公司研发外包活动的研究:中国的实证与新发现[J]. 南开经济研究,2016,(4):99-114.
[19] Feihu Zheng, Hao Jiao & Hongbo Cai.Reappraisal of Outbound Open Innovation under the Policy of China's “Market for Technology”[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2018,1 (30): 1-14.
[20] Williamson O.E. The Economics Institutions of Capitalism[M]. New York: Free Press, MacMilan, 1985.
[21] Barney, J. B.Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage[J]. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1991, pp. 99-120.
[22] JT Mahoney, JR Pandian. The Resource-based View within the Conversation of Strategic Management[J]. Strategic Management, 1992,(13):163-380.

Reevaluation of Exploitation of FDI Policy under the Framework of Open Innovation

开放式创新框架下对外资利用政策的重新评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	WANG Wenhua, ZHANG Zhuo, CAI Ruilin. Effects of Inter-organizational Knowledge Synergy on Innovation Performance [J]. , 2018, 34(9): 85-95.
[2]	. Impact of Knowledge Network Embeddedness on Innovative Capabilities: the Mediating Role of Organizational Learning [J]. , 2014, 30(3): 77-84.