Construction of Regulatory Rules for Digital Currency Trading Platforms from the Perspective of Risk Commonality

›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 105-113.

Construction of Regulatory Rules for Digital Currency Trading Platforms from the Perspective of Risk Commonality

ZHANG Chao

School of Law, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2019-03-26 Online:2020-03-10 Published:2020-03-20

数字货币交易平台的风险及其监管规则建构

张超

北京大学法学院,北京 100871

作者简介:张超(1989-),男,中国香港人,北京大学法学院博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71661137006)

Abstract

Abstract: This paper explores the basic principles and main risks of digital currency, and proposes that the risk commonality of digital currency trading platforms is overlapping of identity and the inability to establish business rules. Strictly regulated regulatory measures cannot effectively curb the risk of trading platforms. Self-regulatory supervision is the optimal solution for coordination of interests between government supervision and trading platforms. The problem of overlapping identity of the trading platform stems from the unclear role of the funds, assets and intermediaries.It is necessary to construct the basic business management rules of the trading platform intermediaries, the investor protection management rules of the funds and the information disclosure management rules of the assets.

Key words: Digital Currency, Digital Currency Trading Platform, Financial Innovation, Self-regulation

摘要： 本文探讨数字货币的基本原理和主要风险,提出数字货币交易平台的风险共性是身份重叠,而身份重叠的问题源于资金端、资产端和中介机构的角色职能不清。强管制型的监管模式无法有效遏制交易平台风险,自律型监管是平衡政府、平台和投资者之间利益协调的最优方案。自律型监管需构建交易平台中介机构的基础业务监管规则、资金端的投资者保护监管规则和资产端的信息披露监管规则。

关键词: 数字货币, 数字货币交易平台, 金融创新, 自律监管

CLC Number:

D922

ZHANG Chao. Construction of Regulatory Rules for Digital Currency Trading Platforms from the Perspective of Risk Commonality[J]. , 2020, 36(3): 105-113.

张超. 数字货币交易平台的风险及其监管规则建构[J]. 财经论丛, 2020, 36(3): 105-113.

References

[1] 戚聿东,李颖.新经济与规制改革[J]. 中国工业经济,2018,(3):5-23.
[2] 杨东.监管科技:金融科技的监管挑战与维度建构[J]. 中国社会科学,2018,(5):69-91.
[3] 叶俊容.国家责任的溢流:国家赔偿法实施现况的检讨[J]. 台大法学论丛,1995,(2):66-71.
[4] Dean M.Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society(Second Edition)[M]. London: Sage Publications Ltd.,2010,pp.76-80.
[5] BIS Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. Digital Currencies[R]. Bank of England Report,2015,pp.4-5.
[6] European Central Bank.Virtual Currency Schemes[R]. European Central Bank Report,2012,pp. 13-15.
[7] Nicole Julie Fobe.Bitcoin as a Parallel Currency: An Economic Vision and Multiple Legal Consequences[J]. São Paulo,2016,pp.22-34.
[8] 姚前.分布式账本与传统账本的异同及其现实意义[J]. 清华金融评论,2018,(6):64-68.
[9] SEC Chief Clayton. Every ICO I've Seen is a Security[EB/OL]. https://www.coindesk.com/sec-chief-clayton-every-ico-ive-seen-security.
[10] SEC.Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO(Release No.81207)[EB/OL]. https://www.sec.gov/litigation/investreport/34-81207.pdf.
[11] SEC.Framework for“Investment Contract”Analysis of Digital Assets[R]. SEC Report,2019, pp.1-25.
[12] RubenLee. What is an Exchange? Automation,Managementand Regulation of Financial Markets[M]. New York: Oxford University Press,1998,pp.1-3.
[13] 姚海放.论证券概念的扩大及对金融监管的意义[J]. 政治与法律,2012,(8):22-29.
[14] 邢会强.我国《证券法》上证券概念的扩大及其边界[J]. 中国法学,2019,(1):245-255.
[15] [美]弗雷德里克·S·米什金著,郑艳文译.货币金融学(第十一版)[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.31-37.
[16] 邢会强.证券期货市场高频交易的法律监管框架研究[J]. 中国法学,2016,(5):156-177.
[17] [美]萨尔·阿努克,约瑟夫·萨露兹著,刘飏译.华尔街的数据大盗:高频交易的罪与罚[M]. 北京:人民邮电出版社,2014.2-32.
[18] 郭锋,施天涛,邢会强,杜晶.关于《证券法》修订的若干建议[J]. 金融服务法评论,2018,(9):3-7.
[19] [美]威廉·N·戈兹曼,K·哥特·罗文霍斯特著,王宇,王文玉译.价值起源[M]. 沈阳:万卷出版公司,2010.2-5.
[20] 顾功耘.证券交易异常情况处置的制度完善[J]. 中国法学,2012,(2):131-145.
[21] 陈洁.投资者到金融消费者的角色嬗变[J]. 法学研究,2011,(5):84-95.
[22] 杨东.论金融消费者概念界定[J]. 法学家,2014,(5):64-76.
[23] 杨东,文诚公.论互联网金融背景下金融权的生成[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2015,(4):100-109.
[24] 谢平,邹传伟,刘海二.互联网金融监管的必要性与核心原则[J]. 国际金融研究,2014,(8):3-9.
[25] [美]凯斯·R·桑斯坦著,尹宏毅,郭彬彬译.极端的人群:群体行为的心理学[M]. 北京:新华出版社,2010.103-140.
[26] 徐明,卢文道.证券交易“买者自负”原则的司法适用及法制化初探[J]. 证券法苑,2011,(2):216-228.