财经论丛 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 64-73.

• 财务与会计 • 上一篇    下一篇

退出威胁能抑制“铁公鸡”公司的不分红行为吗?

胡建雄1, 殷钱茜2   

  1. 1.南京财经大学会计学院,江苏 南京 210023;
    2.南京大学商学院,江苏 南京 210093
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-18 出版日期:2019-10-10 发布日期:2019-10-09
  • 作者简介:胡建雄(1989-),男,安徽黄山人,南京财经大学会计学院讲师,博士;殷钱茜(1991-),女,江苏南京人,南京大学商学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71702070;71472091)

Does Exit Threatening Curb Non-Dividend Payout Behavior of “Iron Roosters”?

HU Jianxiong1, YIN Qianqian2   

  1. 1.School of Accounting,Nanjing University of Finance & Economics,Nanjing 210023,China;
    2.School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China
  • Received:2018-12-18 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-10-09

摘要: 本文探讨了大股东的退出威胁在抑制“铁公鸡”公司的不分红行为过程中所发挥的作用,并结合公司内外治理机制综合考察该作用所呈现的差别性特征。研究发现,大股东的退出威胁能抑制不分红行为。进而,当内在治理机制较不完善时,即控股股东持股比例越高、大股东持股比例相对于控股股东更低时,抑制作用更显著;当外在治理机制较不完善时,即外部审计质量越低时,抑制作用更显著。该结论经多种稳健性检验和替代性解释排除后仍然成立。

关键词: 退出威胁, “铁公鸡”, 现金分红, 治理机制

Abstract: This paper explores the role played by the exit threatening of large shareholder's “voting with their feet” in curbing “Iron Rooster” listed companies' non-dividend payout behaviors. It also examines the distinctive features of this relationship by combining the company's internal and external governance mechanisms. The result shows that exit threatening of large shareholders curbs “Iron Rooster” listed companies' non-dividend payout behavior. Furthermore, when corporate internal governance is relatively rough, or in other words, the higher the shareholding percentage of controlling shareholder, the lower the ratio of large shareholder's holding compared with controlling shareholder's holding, the more significant the curbing effect is. When the corporate external governance is relatively rough, that is to say, the lower the quality of the external auditing, the more significant the cubing effect is. The conclusions are still valid after many robustness tests and alternative explanations.

Key words: Exit Threatening, “Iron Roosters”, Cash Dividends, Governance Mechanism

中图分类号: