财经论丛 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 55-63.

• 财务与会计 • 上一篇    下一篇

高管股权激励对民营中小企业成长的影响机理——基于双重代理成本中介效应的实证研究

徐宁1,2,任天龙1   

  1. 1. 山东大学管理学院
    2. 山东省协同创新软科学研究基地
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-22 修回日期:2013-12-26 出版日期:2014-04-10 发布日期:2014-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 徐宁
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年项目;国家自然科学基金面上项目;山东省优秀中青年科学家科研奖励基金;山东大学自主创新基金青年团队项目

The Impact Mechanism of Executive Equity Incentive on Small and Medium Sized Private Companies Growth——A Empirical Study Based on the mediation effect of Double Agency Cost

  • Received:2013-11-22 Revised:2013-12-26 Online:2014-04-10 Published:2014-03-18

摘要: 民营中小企业的可持续成长问题是现阶段理论界与实践界共同关注的焦点。基于内部因素成长理论与双重委托代理分析框架,以2007-2011年中国民营中小上市公司的平衡面板数据为样本,深入探讨高管股权激励对民营中小企业成长的影响机理,研究表明:高管股权激励能够有效抑制股东与管理层之间的第一类代理成本,但对于由控股股东与中小股东利益冲突而形成的第二类代理成本并没有显著影响;同时第一类代理成本在高管股权激励与民营中小企业成长之间具有显著的中介效应,即股权激励以抑制第一类代理成本为影响路径对民营中小企业成长产生促进效应,但第二类代理成本的中介效应并未显现。

Abstract: Sustainable growth of small and medium sized private listed companies has become a common concern in both theory and practice circle at this stage. Based on the enterprise growth theory and double agency analysis frame, a balanced panel data of 2007~2011 China's small and medium-sized private listed companies is used in this paper, and the relationships between executive equity incentive, double agency cost and company growth are tested by empirical methods. We find that executive equity incentive indeed has a negative effect on Agency Cost I, but it can not influence Agency Cost II significantly. At the same time equity incentives can promote the growth of private listed SMEs, but this is achieved by the entire mediation effect of Agency Cost I. But the mediation effect of agency Cost II is not obvious.

中图分类号: