新型农业经营主体对P2P网络借贷的接受意愿分析

财经论丛 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 58-66.

新型农业经营主体对P2P网络借贷的接受意愿分析

鲁钊阳

西南政法大学经济学院,重庆 401120

收稿日期:2015-11-23 出版日期:2017-02-10 发布日期:2017-02-10
作者简介:鲁钊阳(1980-),男,湖北黄冈人,西南政法大学经济学院副教授,西南政法大学法学博士后流动站博士后
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目(14CJY049; 13XJY025); 第53批中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2013M530389)

The New Agricultural Management Entities' Willingness to Accept the P2P Lending

LU Zhaoyang

School of Economics,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China

Received:2015-11-23 Online:2017-02-10 Published:2017-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于西部地区10省市、2703份有效问卷,运用Probit模型实证新型农业经营主体对P2P网络借贷的接受意愿。结果显示:户主禀赋变量、家庭特征变量和区域特征变量会对新型农业经营主体接受P2P网络借贷产生影响,在户主禀赋变量、家庭特征变量和区域特征变量方面具有优势的新型农业经营主体更容易接受P2P网络借贷,而种养殖业专业大户、家庭农场、农民专业合作社和农业龙头企业等四类新型农业经营主体对P2P网络借贷的接受意愿并无本质差别。

关键词: 新型农业经营主体, P2P网络借贷, Probit模型, 接受意愿

Abstract: Based on 2703 valid questionnaires in 10 provincial units of western China,this paper uses the Probit model to analyze the new agricultural management entities' willingness to accept the P2P lending. The results show that the differences in the variables of householder talents,the regional characteristics and the family characteristcs can influence the new agricultural management entities' willingness to accept the P2P lending,and those that have an advantage in these three variables are more likely to accept the P2P lending. What's more,no essential difference is found in the willingness of the following four types of new agricultural management entities to accept the P2P lending: the professional farmer,the family farm,the farmer cooperatives and the agricultural enterprises.

Key words: New Agricultural Management Entities, P2P Lending, Probit Model, Willingness to Accept

中图分类号:

F320.2

鲁钊阳. 新型农业经营主体对P2P网络借贷的接受意愿分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2017, 33(2): 58-66.

LU Zhaoyang. The New Agricultural Management Entities' Willingness to Accept the P2P Lending[J]. , 2017, 33(2): 58-66.

参考文献

[1] Bachmann A.,Becker A.,Buerckner D.,Hilker M.,Kock F.,Lehmann M.,Tiburtius P.,Funk B. Online Peer-to-peer Lending: A Literature Review[J]. Journal of Internet Banking & Commerce,2011,16(2):1-18.
[2]Lin M. F.,Prabhala N. R.,Viswanathan S. Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Social Networks and Adverse Aelection in Online Peer-to-peer Lending[J]. Management Science,2013,59(1):17-35.
[3]廖理,李梦然,王正位,贺裴菲.观察中学习:P2P网络投资中信息传递与羊群行为[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(1): 156-165.
[4]郑志来.P2P网络借贷平台发展模式及对商业银行影响研究[J].西南金融,2015,(7):53-56.
[5]卢馨,李慧敏.P2P网络借贷的运行模式与风险管控[J].改革,2015,(2):60-68.
[6]Seth F.,Ginger Z.J. Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.com[J]. Social Science Research Network Electronic journal,2008,(11):8-43.
[7]Eunkyoung L.,Byungtae L. Herding Behavior in Online P2P Lending: An Empirical Investigation[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,2012,11(5):495-503.
[8]刘征驰,赖明勇.虚拟抵押品、软信息约束与P2P互联网金融[J].中国软科学,2015,(1):35-46.
[9]刘绘,沈庆劼.我国P2P网络借贷的风险与监管研究[J].财经问题研究,2015,(1): 52-59.
[10] 肖曼君,欧缘媛,李颖.我国P2P网络借贷信用风险影响因素研究:基于排序选择模型的实证分析[J].财经理论与实践,2015,(1): 2-6.
[11]王会娟,廖理.中国P2P网络借贷平台信用认证机制研究:来自“人人贷”的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2014,(4): 136-147.
[12]钱炳.借款人声誉对融资成本的影响研究:来自P2P网络借贷平台“拍拍贷”的经验证据[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(2):141-147.
[13]王会娟,何琳.借款描述对P2P网络借贷行为影响的实证研究[J].金融经济学研究,2015,(1):77-85.
[14]邵丽平,邵利敏.P2P网络借贷的监管边界:理论探讨与中国的检验[J].经济社会体制比较,2015,(3):175-184.
[15]俞林,康灿华,王龙.互联网金融监管博弈研究:以P2P网贷模式为例[J].南开经济研究,2015,(5):126-139.