房地产税改革、地方公共服务与区位选择——基于京津冀人口流动的空间黏性视角

财经论丛 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 30-37.

房地产税改革、地方公共服务与区位选择——基于京津冀人口流动的空间黏性视角

杨峥¹, 张忠萌²

1.天津财经大学经济学院,天津 300222;
2.北京大学软件与微电子学院,北京 102600

收稿日期:2017-01-12 出版日期:2018-01-10 发布日期:2018-01-10
作者简介:杨峥(1981-),男,天津市人,天津财经大学经济学院讲师,博士;张忠萌(1994-),女,天津市人,北京大学软件与微电子学院硕士生。
基金资助:
天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJYY16-011);天津财经大学青年教师自主选题预研资助计划(05010154)

Property Tax Reform, Local Public Services and Location ChoiceBased on the Spatial Stickiness of Population Flow in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei

YANG Zheng¹, ZHANG Zhongmeng²

1.School of Economics, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China;
2. School of Software and Microelectronics, Peking University, Beijing 102600, China

Received:2017-01-12 Online:2018-01-10 Published:2018-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国区域发展极不均衡的现实表明各地房地产价值存在着巨大差异,房地产税改革必须深入探究征税对象所固有的区位属性以及人口城镇化的空间秩序。本文将房地产税改革可能引起的价格效应与地方政府融资和区域公共服务相结合,从人口流动的区位黏性这一全新视角模拟出同一税率下不同城镇化阶段地区的房地产价格走势。结果表明,即使2018年全面开征房地产税,全国房地产价格依然有上涨空间。随着有序疏解北京非首都功能的步伐日益加快,开征房地产税对北京房价有适度抑制作用,天津市与河北省作为北京的“近邻”,在功能疏解和产业转移等方面承担着重任,房地产税的价格调控效果不明显。

关键词: 房地产税, 地方公共服务, 人口流动, 空间黏性

Abstract: That China's regional development is not balanced shows that there are huge differences about the value of real estate, and the property tax reform must delve into the inherent object of taxation location attribute and population urbanization spatial order. This paper combines the price effect that may be caused by the property tax reform and the local government financing and regional public services into research framework, and simulates the prices trend of different urbanization stage from a new perspective. The results show that even if the property tax is to be levied in 2018, the national real estate price will still have room to rise. With the speeding up of the orderly ease of Beijing's non-capital function, the property tax has a moderate inhibitory effect on the housing prices in Beijing, while in its “nearest neighbor”, Tianjin and Hebei province, which play an important role in function ease and industrial transfer, the effect of real estate price regulation is not obvious.

Key words: Property Tax, Local Public Services, Population Flow, Spatial Stickiness

中图分类号:

F810.422

杨峥, 张忠萌. 房地产税改革、地方公共服务与区位选择——基于京津冀人口流动的空间黏性视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(1): 30-37.

YANG Zheng, ZHANG Zhongmeng. Property Tax Reform, Local Public Services and Location ChoiceBased on the Spatial Stickiness of Population Flow in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei[J]. , 2018, 34(1): 30-37.

参考文献

[1] Krugman. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade [J]. American Economic Review, 1980, 70(5):950-959.
[2] Tiebout. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64(10): 416-424.
[3] Oates. The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1969, (6):957-971.
[4] Arnott, Stiglitz. Aggregate Land Rents, Expenditure on Public Goods and Optimal City Size [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979, (4):471-500.
[5] Dimasi. The Effects of Site Value Taxation in an Urban Area: A General Equilibrium Computational Approach [J]. National Tax Journal, 1987, 40(4):577-590.
[6] 程瑶. 地方政府房地产税收依赖的国际比较与借鉴[J]. 财政研究,2012,(11):72-76.
[7] 程瑶,高波. 房地产税对地方政府的激励效应研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报,2008,(7):1-4.
[8] 杜雪君,黄忠华,吴次芳. 房地产税、地方公共支出对房价影响——全国及区域层面的面板数据分析[J]. 中国土地科学,2009, (7):9-13, 19.
[9] 唐明. 房地产税改革为何启而难动[J]. 当代财经,2013,(8):24-33.
[10] 蒋震,高培勇.渐进式推进个人房产税改革[J]. 宏观经济研究,2014,(6):8-12, 28.
[11] 周艳. 城镇化进程中的房地产税改革路径选择[J]. 经济纵横,2015,(11):110-113.
[12] 侯一麟, 马海涛. 中国房地产税设计原理和实施策略分析[J]. 财政研究,2016,(2):65-78.
[13] Arnott, Stiglitz. Aggregate Land Rents And Aggregate Transport Costs [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,1981, 91(362):331-347.
[14] Hoyt. Competitive Jurisdictions, Congestion, and the Henry George Theorem [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1991, 21(3):351-370.
[15] Henderson. Will Homeowners Impose Property Taxes? [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1995, 25(2):153-181.
[16] Kmenta. On Estimation of The CES Production Function [J]. International Economic Review, 1967, 8(2):180-189.
[17] 郝枫, 盛卫燕.中国要素替代弹性估计[J]. 统计研究, 2014, (7):12-21.
[18] Chirinko. Σ: The Long and Short of it [J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2008, (30):671-686.