股票期权激励、债务契约与投资性房地产计量模式选择

财经论丛 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 74-83.

股票期权激励、债务契约与投资性房地产计量模式选择

王烨¹,孙慧倩¹,王宁宁²

1.南京审计大学会计学院,江苏南京 211815;
2.无锡太湖学院会计学院,江苏无锡 214064

收稿日期:2018-02-08 出版日期:2018-12-10 发布日期:2018-12-05
作者简介:王烨(1970-),男,安徽滁州人,南京审计大学会计学院教授,博士;孙慧倩(1975-),女,安徽蚌埠人,南京审计大学会计学院讲师,博士;王宁宁(1991-),女,江苏徐州人,无锡太湖学院会计学院助教。
基金资助:
江苏省社会科学基金项目(18GLB004);江苏省高校品牌专业建设工程资助项目(PPZY2015A075);江苏省高校人文社会科学校外研究基地“苏南资本市场研究中心”(2017ZSJD020)

Stock Option Incentive,Debt Contract and the Choice of theInvestment Real Estate Measurement Model

WANG Ye¹, SUN Huiqian¹, WANG Ningning²

1.School of Accounting,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China;
2.School of Accounting,Wuxi Taihu College,Wuxi 214064,China

Received:2018-02-08 Online:2018-12-10 Published:2018-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以我国沪深两市2007~2016年间持有投资性房地产的非金融保险行业上市公司为对象,研究了股票期权激励与债务契约动因对投资性房地产公允价值计量模式选择的影响。研究发现,与未实施股票期权激励计划的公司相比较,实施股票期权激励的公司更可能对投资性房地产采用公允价值模式进行后续计量;公司对投资性房地产后续计量选择公允价值模式的概率,随债务水平的增高而增大;进一步分析发现,股票期权激励与债务契约动因对投资性房地产公允价值后续计量模式的选择存在交乘效应影响,实施股票期权激励会强化债务契约动因与投资性房地产公允价值后续计量模式选择之间的正相关关系。结果表明,强化审计监督,优化股票期权激励和债务契约的制定与执行,对于投资性房地产公允价值会计信息质量的提高具有非常重要意义。

关键词: 投资性房地产, 股票期权激励, 债务契约, 公允价值

Abstract: Using samples of listed companies in China's Non-financial insurance industry with real estate investment in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2007 to 2016,this paper studies the influence of motivation of stock option incentive and debt contract on the choice of fair value measurement model of real estate investment. The findings are as follows:The companies which implement stock option incentive plans are more likely to adopt a fair value model for real estate investment than those which do not implement stock option incentive. The higher the debt level of the company,the greater the probability for the fair value model to be used in the subsequent measurement of the real estate investment. Further analysis show that the motivation of stock option incentive and debt contract have an interaction effect on the choice of fair value measurement model of real estate investment,and the implementation of stock option incentive will strengthen the positive relationship between the choice of fair value measurement model of real estate investment and the motivation of debt covenants. These results indicate that it is very important to strengthen audit supervision and optimize the formulation and implementation of the stock option incentive and the debt contract for the improvement of the investment real estate fair value accounting information quality.

Key words: Investment Real Estate, Stock Option Incentive, Debt Contract, Fair Value

中图分类号:

F270

王烨,孙慧倩,王宁宁. 股票期权激励、债务契约与投资性房地产计量模式选择[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(12): 74-83.

WANG Ye, SUN Huiqian, WANG Ningning. Stock Option Incentive,Debt Contract and the Choice of theInvestment Real Estate Measurement Model[J]. , 2018, 34(12): 74-83.

参考文献

[1] Watts R.,Zimmerman J. Positive Accounting Theory [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,1986.
[2] Healy P. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,1985,(7):85-107.
[3] Daniel S. J.,Jung B.,Pourjalali H.,Wen E. Firm Characteristics Influencing Responses towards Adoption of the Fair Value Accounting Option:A Survey of Chief Financial Officers of U. S. Firms [EB/OL]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1579326,2010.
[4] 王跃堂.会计政策选择的经济动机——基于沪深股市的实证研究[J]. 会计研究,2000,(12):31-40.
[5] Hlaing K. P.,Pourjalali H. Economic Reasons for Reporting PPE at Fair Market Value by Foreign Cross-Listed Firms in the United States[J]. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance,2012,27(4):557-576.
[6] Christensen H. B.,Nikohev V. V. Does Fair Value Accounting for Non-Financial Assets Pass the Market Test? [J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2013,18(3):734-775.
[7] Demaria S.,Dufour D. First Time Adoption of IFRS,Fair Value Option,Conservatism:Evidence from French listed Companies[R]. Published in “30 eme colloque de I' EAA,Porlugal:Lisbon”,2007.
[8] Quagli A.,Avallone F. Fair Value of Cost Model? Drives of Choice for IAS 40 in the Real Estate Industry [J]. European Accounting Review,2010,9 (3):461-493.
[9] 刘永泽,马妍.投资性房地产公允价值计量模式的应用困境与对策[J]. 当代财经,2011,(8):102-109.
[10] 邹燕,王雪,吴小雅.公允价值计量在投资性房地产中的运用研究——以津滨发展及同行业同地区公司为例[J]. 会计研究,2013,(9):22-28.
[11] Qiang X. The Effects of Contracting,Litigation,Regulation,and Tax Costs on Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism:Cross-sectional Evidence at the Firm Level [J]. The Accounting Review,2007,82(3):759-796.
[12] Beatty A.,Weber J. The Effects of Debt Contracting on Voluntary Accounting Method Changes [J]. The Accounting Review,2003,78(1):119-142.
[13] 徐经长,曾雪云.公允价值计量与管理层薪酬契约[J]. 会计研究,2010,(3):12-19.
[14] 刘斌,孙雪梅.会计政策选择的契约动因——来自我国上市公司低值易耗品摊销方法选择的经验数据[J]. 中央财经大学学报,2005,(5):71-75.
[15] 叶建芳,周兰,李丹蒙,郭琳.管理层动机、会计政策选择与盈余管理——基于新会计准则下上市公司金融资产分类的实证研究[J]. 会计研究,2009,(3):25-30.
[16] Jung B.,Pournlali H.,Wen E.,Daniel S. J. The Association between Firm Characteristics and CFO's Opinions on the Fair Value 0ption for Non-Financial Assets [J]. Advances in Accounting,2013,29(3):255-266.
[17] Muller K. A.,Riedll E. J.,Sellhorn T. Causes and Consequences of Choosing Historical Cost versus Fair Value [Z]. Working Paper,Pennsylvania State University,Harvard Business School and Ruhr-Universitat Bochum,2008.
[18] Danbolt J.,Rees W. An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting:UK Investment Vehicles [J]. European Accounting Review,2008,17(2):271-303.
[19] 张奇峰,张鸣,戴佳君.投资性房地产公允价值计量的财务影响与决定因素:以北辰实业为例[J]. 会计研究,2011,(8):22-29.
[20] 候晓红,李刚,郭雅.市场化程度、借款契约与公允价值计量选择——基于公允价值计量在投资性房地产中应用的实证研究[J]. 当代会计评论,2013,(1):78-88.
[21] 张瑞丽,曲晓辉,张国华.投资性房地产计量模式选择的动机及影响因素研究——来自中国A股市场的经验数据[J]. 当代财经,2014,(7):115-129.
[22] Smith C. W.,Watts R. L. Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation Plans [J]. Australian Journal of Management,1982,7:139-157.
[23] Schipper K. Commentary on Earnings Management[J]. Accounting Horizons,1989,12:91-102.
[24] Bartov E.,Mohanram P. Private Information,Earnings Manipulations,and Executive Stock Option Exercise [J]. The Accounting Review,2004,79:889-920.
[25] 吕长江,张海平.股权激励计划对公司投资行为的影响[J]. 管理世界,2011,(11):118-126.
[26] 郑志刚,成为,许荣.对上市与企业绩效改善关系的再检验——基于我国制造业配对样本的证据[J]. 金融研究,2014,(9):143-157.
[27] 淦未宇,徐细雄,林丁健.高管性别、权力结构与企业反伦理行为——基于上市公司违规操作PSM配对样本的实证检验[J]. 外国经济与管理,2015,(10):18-31.