董事会断裂带对创业导向的影响——行为整合机制的调节效应

财经论丛 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 83-93.

董事会断裂带对创业导向的影响——行为整合机制的调节效应

戴维奇¹, 刘赫¹, 林巧²

1.浙江财经大学工商管理学院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.浙江大学宁波理工学院,浙江宁波 315100

收稿日期:2017-10-19 出版日期:2018-04-10 发布日期:2018-04-13
作者简介:戴维奇(1977-),男,浙江杭州人,浙江财经大学工商管理学院副教授;刘赫(1990-),男,吉林白山人,浙江财经大学工商管理学院硕士生;林巧(1979-),女,江西上饶人,浙江大学宁波理工学院副教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71672168);浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地课题(15JDZS03YB);浙江省自然科学基金资助项目( LY16G020020)

Corporate Board Faultline and Entrepreneurial Orientation——The Moderating Roles of Behavioral Integration

DAI Weiqi¹, LIU He¹, LIN Qiao²

1. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2. Zhejiang University Ningbo Institute of Technology, Ningbo 315100, China

Received:2017-10-19 Online:2018-04-10 Published:2018-04-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以高阶梯队理论和群体断裂带理论为基础,探索董事会断裂带与创业导向之间的关系,以及影响二者关系的两种重要行为整合机制——董事会成员交叉任期和董事长职能背景广泛性。基于信息传输、软件和信息技术服务业A股上市公司2012~2016年面板数据的实证研究表明:董事会断裂带对创业导向具有负向影响;董事会成员交叉任期和董事长职能背景广泛性对上述关系具有正向调节作用。文章探讨特定行为整合机制下董事会断裂带与创业导向的关系丰富了有关创业导向前因的研究,通过提出并验证交叉任期和董事长职能背景广泛性这两个具体的行为整合机制而丰富了高阶梯队理论,对企业的创业管理实践亦具有重要启示。

关键词: 创业导向, 断裂带, 交叉任期, 职能背景

Abstract: Based upon the upper echelons theory and group faultline theory, this paper examines the relationship between faultlines within corporate board and levels of entrepreneurial orientation as well as the moderating roles of overlapping tenure within the board and chairman functional diversity on the afore-mentioned relationship. The empirical research on the panel data of A-share companies in information transmission, software and information services industries from 2012 to 2016 finds that faultlines are negatively related to entrepreneurial orientation. Moreover, this relationship is positively moderated by both overlapping tenure within the board and chairman functional diversity. This paper enriches the discussion on the antecedents of entrepreneurial orientation by exploring how faultlines affect firm-level entrepreneurship, and contributes to the upper echelons theory by identifying two behavioral integration mechanisms (i.e., overlapping tenure and chairman functional diversity). This paper has managerial implications for those firms that aim to successfully manage corporate entrepreneurial activities.

Key words: Entrepreneurial Orientation, Faultline, Overlapping Tenure, Chairman Functional Diversity

中图分类号:

F270

戴维奇, 刘赫, 林巧. 董事会断裂带对创业导向的影响——行为整合机制的调节效应[J]. 财经论丛, 2018, 34(4): 83-93.

DAI Weiqi, LIU He, LIN Qiao. Corporate Board Faultline and Entrepreneurial Orientation——The Moderating Roles of Behavioral Integration[J]. , 2018, 34(4): 83-93.

参考文献

[1] 戴维奇, 刘洋, 廖明情. 烙印效应:民营企业谁在“不务正业”？[J]. 管理世界, 2016, (5): 99-115.
[2] 戴维奇, 魏江, 林巧. 公司创业活动影响因素研究前沿探析与未来热点展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2009, 31(6): 10-17.
[3] 魏江, 戴维奇, 林巧. 公司创业研究领域两个关键构念——创业导向与公司创业——的比较[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2009, 31(1): 24-31.
[4] Dai W., Liu Y. Local vs. Non-Local Institutional Embeddedness, Corporate Entrepreneurship, and Firm Performance in a Transitional Economy[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2015, 23(2): 255-270.
[5] Hambrick D. C. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2): 334-343.
[6] Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.
[7] 李华晶, 邢晓东. 高管团队与公司创业战略:基于高阶理论和代理理论融合的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, (9): 139-144.
[8] 周建, 李小青. 董事会认知异质性对企业创新战略影响的实证研究[J]. 管理科学, 2012, 25(6): 1-12.
[9] Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of OrganizationalGroups[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(1): 325-340.
[10] Thatcher M. B., Jehn K. A., Zanutto E. Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2003, 12(3): 217-241.
[11] Hambrick D. C. Fragmentation and the Other Problems CEOs Have with Their Top Management Teams[J]. California Management Review, 1995, 37(3): 110-127.
[12] Barkema H. G., Shvyrkov O. Does Top Management Team Diversity Promote or Hamper Foreign Expansion？[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(7): 663-680.
[13] Tuggle C. S., Schnatterly K., Johnson R. A. Attention Patterns in the Boardroom: How Board Composition and Processesaffect Discussion of Entrepreneurial Issues[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(3): 550-571.
[14] Kish-Gephart J. J., Campbell J. T. You Dont Forget Your Roots: The Influence of CEO Social Class Background on Strategic Risk Taking[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 58(6): 1614-1636.
[15] Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I. Governance, Social Identity, and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Closely Held Public Companies[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2011, 35(5): 1051-1076.
[16] 汪祥耀, 迟殿洲, 金一禾. 家族企业CEO来源、风险承担及经济后果[J]. 财经论丛, 2017,(11): 74-83.
[17] Kaczmarek S., Kimino S., Pye A. Board Task-related Faultlines and Firm Performance: A Decade of Evidence[J]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2012, 20(4): 337-351.
[18] Meyer B., Glenz A. Team Faultline Measures: A Computational Comparison and a New Approach to Multiple Subgroups[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(3): 393-424.
[19] 戴维奇, 李强. 正式与非正式知识搜索、知识属性与产品创新[J]. 财经论丛, 2016,(9): 81-91.
[20] 杨萱, 罗飞. 中小板上市公司高管团队特征与企业创新行为关系研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2016,(5): 87-95.
[21] 赵丙艳, 葛玉辉, 刘喜怀. TMT认知、断裂带对创新绩效的影响:战略柔性的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(6): 112-122.
[22] Chen H. L., Chang C. Y., Hsu W. T. Does Board Co-Working Experience Influence Directors' Decisions Toward Internationalization？[J]. Management International Review, 2017, 57(1): 65-92.
[23] 李小青, 周建. 董事会群体断裂带对企业战略绩效的影响研究——董事长职能背景和董事会持股比例的调节作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015, 37(11): 3-14.