相貌与女性劳动参与决策——来自CLDS数据的证据

财经论丛 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 3-11.

• 劳动经济 • 下一篇

相貌与女性劳动参与决策——来自CLDS数据的证据

李楠

中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉 430073

收稿日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-10-10 发布日期:2019-10-09
作者简介:李楠(1987-),女,安徽砀山人,中南财经政法大学公共管理学院博士生。

Appearance and Women's Labor Participation——Evidence from CLDS Data

LI Nan

School of Public Management, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China

Received:2018-10-08 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文利用2016年CLDS数据,从经验数据中分离劳动力市场上相貌带来的“主妇化”效应和“美貌溢价”效应,解释貌美者女性劳动参与率下降的原因。尽管劳动力市场上存在“美貌溢价”或“相貌歧视”,但貌美并没有对女性的劳动参与决策产生明显的促进作用,反而呈现越是貌美者,劳动参与概率越低;以劳动参与时间替代劳动参与决策后,研究结论依然稳健。对受教育程度不同的女性个体来说,其劳动参与决策存在显著的低学历“主妇化”效应。虽然貌美者的劳动参与概率显著低于非貌美者,但这种低劳动参与概率仅出现在体制外单位。本文揭示相貌引致的“美貌溢价”和“主妇化”效应对女性劳动参与率下降产生的影响及背后的机制,为我国女性劳动参与率下降现象提供一个新的补充解释。

关键词: 相貌, 主妇化, 美貌溢价, 劳动参与决策

Abstract: Based on the data from China labor-force dynamic survey(2016), this paper extracts the “housewifization” effect and the “beauty premium” effect in the labor market from the empirical data, and explain the reasons for the decline of attractive women's labor participation rate. First, although there is “appearance discrimination” or “beauty premium” in the labor market, beauty does not have a significant relation with women's participation in the labor market. On the contrary, the more beautiful the woman is, the lower probability of her participation in the labor market . This result still holds true when the labor participation decision-making factor is replaced by the labor participation time. Second, for female individuals with different educational levels, their labor participation decision-making has a significant effect of “housewifization” with low educational background. Third, although the labor participation probability of attractive women is significantly lower than that of unattractive ones, this kind of low labor participation probability mainly occurs in the units outside the system. This paper reveals the effect of “beauty premium” and “housewifization” effect on the decline of women's labor participation rate and the mechanism behind it, which provides a new explanation for the decline of women's labor participation rate in China.

Key words: Appearance, Housewifization, Beauty Premium, Labor Participation

中图分类号:

F241.4

李楠. 相貌与女性劳动参与决策——来自CLDS数据的证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2019, 35(10): 3-11.

LI Nan. Appearance and Women's Labor Participation——Evidence from CLDS Data[J]. , 2019, 35(10): 3-11.

参考文献

[1] 王靖雯,魏思琦.“婚姻法司法解释三”对女性劳动力供给的影响[J]. 经济学动态,2016,(7):44-50.
[2] 卿石松.性别角色观念、家庭责任与劳动参与模式研究[J]. 社会科学,2017,(11):91-100.
[3] 尹木子.女性主妇化的影响因素——基于中国社会状况综合调查数据的研究[J]. 人口与发展,2016, (1):19-27.
[4] 蔡昉.人口转变、人口红利与刘易斯转折点[J]. 经济研究,2010,(4):4-13.
[5] 吴伟平,章元,刘乃全.房价与女性劳动参与决策——来自CHNS数据的证据[J]. 经济学动态,2016, (11):57-67.
[6] 吴要武.剥离收入效应和替代效应——对城镇女性市场参与变化的解释[J]. 劳动经济研究,2015, (4):3-30.
[7] Hamermesh D. S., Biddle J. E. Beauty and the Labor Market[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(5):1174-1194.
[8] 落合惠美子,宫坂靖子,周维宏.亚洲社会的家庭和两性关系[M]. 北京:世界知识出版社, 2011.322.
[9] 黄华.从陈衡哲的女性观看当代中国“新主妇”[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(6):70-78.
[10] 吴小英.主妇化的兴衰——来自个体化视角的阐释[J]. 南京社会科学,2014,(2):62-68.
[11] 风笑天,肖洁.中国女性性别角色意识的城乡差异研究[J]. 人文杂志,2014,(11):107-116.
[12] 吴利娟.多元表述中的社会性别规范生产——对“嫁得好”与“干得好”的话语分析[J]. 中华女子学院学报,2017,(1):69-76.
[13] Griffey J. A., Little A. C. Infant's Visual Preferences for Facial Traits Associated with Adult Attractiveness Judgements: Data from Eye-tracking[J]. Infant Behavior and Development,2014, 37(3):268-275.
[14] Griffin A. M., Langlois J. H. Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad?[J]. Social Cognition,2006,24(2):187-206.
[15] 江求川,张克中.中国劳动力市场中的“美貌经济学”:身材重要吗？[J]. 经济学(季刊),2013,(2): 983-1006.
[16] Kuhn P., Shen K. Gender Discrimination in Job Ads: Theory and Evidence[Z]. NBER Working Paper,2011, No.17453.
[17] Heckman J. What has been Learned about Labor Supply in the Past Twenty Years?[J]. American Economic Review,1993,83(1):116-121.
[18] 郭继强,费舒澜,林平.越漂亮,收入越高吗?——兼论相貌与收入的“高跟鞋曲线”[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017,(1):147-172.
[19] 孟捷,李怡乐.关于劳动力市场分割动因的三种解释——评述与拓展[J]. 当代财经,2012,(6):5-15.
[20] Kunze A. The Determination of Wages and the Gender Wage Gap: A Survey[Z]. IZA Working Paper,Bonn,2000,No.193.
[21] 张樨樨,生光旭.全面二孩政策背景下的城镇女性劳动参与:理论、实证与政策框架[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(4):112-122.
[22] 边燕杰,李路路,李煜.结构壁垒、体制转型与地位资源含量[J]. 中国社会科学,2006,(5): 100-109.
[23] 卿石松.性别角色观念、家庭责任与劳动参与模式研究[J]. 社会科学,2017,(11):91-100.
[24] 解垩.健康对劳动力退出的影响[J]. 世界经济文汇,2011,(1):109-120.
[25] 杨凡.流动人口正规就业与非正规就业的工资差异研究——基于倾向值方法的分析[J]. 人口研究,2015, (6):94-104.
[26] Ortega C. Gender Gaps in Unemployment Rates in Argentina[J]. Económica,2008,(54):161-202.
[27] Azmat G., Güell M., Manning A. Gender Gaps in Unemployment Rates in OECD Countries[J]. Journal of Labor Economics,2006,24(1):1-37.
[28] 袁晓燕,石磊.受教育程度对女性劳动时间配置的影响研究[J]. 上海经济研究,2017,(6):31-41.
[29] Acemoglu D., Autor D. H. Skills,Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings[J]. Handbook of Labor Economics,2011,4(1):1043-1171.
[30] 刘一鹏,郑元,张川川.长得好有高收入?——中国劳动力市场的相貌歧视问题研究[J]. 经济评论,2016, (5):83-95.
[31] 李路路,朱斌,王煜.市场转型、劳动力市场分割与工作组织流动[J]. 中国社会科学,2016,(9): 126-145.
[32] 刘志国,James Ma.劳动力市场的部门分割与体制内就业优势研究[J]. 中国人口科学,2016,(4):85-95.

相貌与女性劳动参与决策——来自CLDS数据的证据

Appearance and Women's Labor Participation——Evidence from CLDS Data

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics