家庭住房租购选择之谜——基于主客观社会地位的视角公共选择理论下的税收成本与社会契约形式转变

财经论丛 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 42-53.

家庭住房租购选择之谜——基于主客观社会地位的视角公共选择理论下的税收成本与社会契约形式转变

邹静¹,邓晓军²

1.上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海 200433;
2.浙江财经大学经济学院,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2018-06-02 出版日期:2019-03-10 发布日期:2019-03-11
作者简介:邹静(1986-),女,四川广安人,上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院博士生;邓晓军(1981-),男,江西吉安人,浙江财经大学经济学院副教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(41601039);上海财经大学研究生创新基金资助项目(CXJJ-2017-404)

The Mystery of Housing Tenure Choice of Families in China
——Based on the Perspective of the Subjective and Objective Social Status

ZOU Jing¹, DENG Xiaojun²

1.School of Public Economics and Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433, China;
2.School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2018-06-02 Online:2019-03-10 Published:2019-03-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于2012年和2014年中国劳动力动态调查的家庭微观面板数据,运用Probit、IV Probit模型研究主客观社会地位对家庭住房租购选择的影响。结果发现:(1)家庭主观社会地位主要受家庭资产状况的影响,而不是受户主客观社会地位的影响,二者并不总是表现出一致性。(2)当前的和预期的主观社会地位显著正向影响家庭的住房租购选择,主要表现在中西部家庭、农业户口家庭和一套房家庭中。当前主观社会地位每增加一个等级,家庭的住房自有率提高0.5%;而预期的主观社会地位每增加一个等级,家庭的住房自有率提高0.3%。(3)客观社会地位中教育、职业、家庭永久性收入对家庭住房租购选择的影响不一致。

关键词: 主观社会地位, 客观社会地位, 住房租购选择

Abstract: Based on the micro section data of CLDS in 2012 and 2014, this paper uses Probit and IV Probit model to investigate the influence of the objective and subjective social status on housing tenure choice of families. The results are as follows : (1) Subjective social status of the family is mainly affected by the family assets, not by the objective social status of the householder, and they do not always show consistency. (2)The current and expected social status can significantly increase the home-ownership rate of the household, mainly in the Midwestern families, agricultural households and onesuite families. When the current subjective social status increases by one level, the family's home-ownership rate increases by 0.5 percentage points; and when the expected subjective social status increases by one grade, the family's home-ownership rate increases by 0.3 percentage points. (3) In the objective social status, education, occupation and the permanent income of the household have different effects on the home-ownership rate of the household. The home-ownership rate for households with secondary education background is low. Compared with management professionals, households with ordinary occupations have a higher home-ownership rate. The higher the permanent income of the household, the higher the home-ownership rate of eastern households and agricultural households are.Accordingly, corresponding policy suggestions are put forward.

Key words: Subjective Social Status, Objective Social Status, Housing Tenure Choice, IV Probit Model

中图分类号:

F061.5

邹静,邓晓军. 家庭住房租购选择之谜——基于主客观社会地位的视角公共选择理论下的税收成本与社会契约形式转变[J]. 财经论丛, 2019, 35(3): 42-53.

ZOU Jing, DENG Xiaojun. The Mystery of Housing Tenure Choice of Families in China
——Based on the Perspective of the Subjective and Objective Social Status[J]. , 2019, 35(3): 42-53.

参考文献

[1] 杨赞, 张欢, 赵丽清. 中国住房的双重属性:消费和投资的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2014, (s1):55-65.
[2] 赵奉军, 邹琳华. 自有住房的影响与决定因素研究评述[J]. 经济学动态, 2012, (10):137-143.
[3] Coulson N. Edward, Fisher Lynn M. Tenure Choice and Labour Market Outcomes[J]. Housing Studies,2002, 17(1):35-49.
[4] 边燕杰, 刘勇利. 社会分层、住房产权与居住质量——对中国“五普”数据的分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2005, (3):82-98.
[5] 刘望保, 闫小培, 曹小曙. 转型期中国城镇居民住房类型分化及其影响因素——基于CGSS(2005)的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2010,(8):949-960.
[6] 孙玉环, 张金芳. 中国家庭住房产权类型分化研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2014, (3):89-103.
[7] 李超, 倪鹏飞, 万海远. 中国住房需求持续高涨之谜:基于人口结构视角[J]. 经济研究, 2015, (5):118-133.
[8] Mcdonald J F. Housing Market Discrimination, Homeownership, and Savings Behavior: Comment[J]. American Economic Review,1974, 64(1):225-229.
[9] Li Mingche M. A Logit Model of Homeownership[J]. Econometrica,1977, 45(5):1081-1097.
[10] Chiuri M. C., Jappelli T. Do the Elderly Reduce Housing Equity? An International Comparison[J]. Journal of Population Economics,2010, 23(2):643-663.
[11] Painter Gary. Tenure Choice with Sample Selection: Differences among Alternative Samples[J]. Journal of Housing Economics,2000, 9(3):197-213.
[12] Ioannides Yannis M., Rosenthal Stuart S. Estimating the Consumption and Investment Demands for Housing and Their Effect on Housing Tenure Status[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1994, 76(1):127.
[13] Coulson N. Edward. Why Are Hispanic-and Asian-American Homeownership Rates So Low?: Immigration and Other Factors[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1998, 45(2):209-227.
[14] Tu Yong, Bao Helen X. H. Property Rights and Housing Value: The Impacts of Political Instability[J]. Real Estate Economics,2009, 37(2):235-257.
[15] Mcfadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1974. 105-142.
[16] 徐淑一, 王宁宁. 经济地位、主观社会地位与居民自感健康[J]. 统计研究, 2015, (3):62-68.
[17] Adler Nancy E. Subjective Social Status: Reliability and Predictive Utility for Global Health[J]. Psychology & Health,2004, 19(2):237-246.
[18] Ostrove Joan M., Adler Nancy E., Kuppermann Miriam,et al.Objective and Subjective Assessments of Socioeconomic Status and Their Relationship to Self-Rated Health in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Pregnant Women[J]. Health Psychology,2000,19(6):613.
[19] Logan J., Molotch H. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press,1987. 374-375.
[20] Goodman E., Adler N. E., Daniels S. R.,et al. Impact of Objective and Subjective Social Status on Obesity in a Biracial Cohort of Adolescents[J]. Obesity Research, 2003, 11(8):1018-1026.
[21] 李强. 中国大陆城市农民工的职业流动[J]. 社会学研究, 1999,(3):95-103.
[22] Chen J., Jin M. Income Elasticity of Housing Demand in China:Micro-data Evidence from Shanghai [J]. Journal of Contemporary China,2014, 23(85):68-84.
[23] 边燕杰, 李路路, 李煜,等. 结构壁垒、体制转型与地位资源含量[J]. 中国社会科学, 2006, (5):100-109.
[24] 仇立平, 肖日葵. 文化资本与社会地位获得——基于上海市的实证研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011, (6):121-135.
[25] Cole Harold L., Mailath George J., Postlewaite Andrew. Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(6):1092-1125.
[26] Weiss Y., Fershtman C. Social Status and Economic Performance: A Survey [J]. European Economic Review,1997, 42(5):801-820.
[27] 金烨, 李宏彬, 吴斌珍. 收入差距与社会地位寻求:一个高储蓄率的原因[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2011, (3):887-912.