股票流动性对企业研发投入的影响——融资约束和代理成本的中介作用与调节作用

财经论丛 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 73-82.

股票流动性对企业研发投入的影响——融资约束和代理成本的中介作用与调节作用

董竹¹, 张欣¹, 李雨奇²

1.吉林大学商学院,吉林长春 130012;
2.东北大学专业学院,马萨诸塞州波士顿 02115

收稿日期:2019-10-24 出版日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2020-08-13
作者简介:董竹(1968-),女,吉林长春人,吉林大学商学院教授,博士生导师;张欣(1994-),女,山东临沂人,吉林大学商学院博士生;李雨奇(1996-),女,辽宁沈阳人,东北大学专业学院硕士生。
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目(17JZD016);教育部人文社科基金项目(16JJD790016)

The Impact of Stock Liquidity on Corporate R&D Investment: The Mediating Effect and Moderating Effect of Financing Constraint and Agency Cost

DONG Zhu¹, ZHANG Xin¹, LI Yuqi²

1. School of Business, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China;
2. College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University, Boston 02115, The United States

Received:2019-10-24 Online:2020-08-10 Published:2020-08-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于2007~2017年沪深A股上市公司的数据,采用回归分析和中介效应检验程序,实证检验了股票流动性对企业研发投入的影响以及融资约束和两类代理成本的中介作用和调节作用。研究结果表明:(1)股票流动性与企业研发投入之间显著正相关,股票流动性会促进企业的研发投入;(2)股票流动性显著降低融资约束和第二类代理成本,进而提高企业的研发投入,融资约束和第二类代理成本在股票流动性影响研发投入的过程中发挥部分中介作用;(3)第一类代理成本在股票流动性影响研发投入的过程中发挥调节作用,第一类代理成本越高,股票流动性对企业研发投入的促进作用越显著。为克服模型的内生性,选择融资融券业务作为准自然实验,通过构建倾向匹配得分和双重差分估计模型,所得结果仍然支持研究结论。

关键词: 股票流动性, 研发投入, 融资约束, 代理成本

Abstract: Based on the data of Shanghai-Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2017,this paper empirically tests the impact of stock liquidity on R&D investment and the mediating role of financing constraints and two types of agency costs by using regression analysis and mediation effect testing procedures.The results of the study are as follows: (1) There is a significant positive correlation between stock liquidity and corporate R&D investment,indicating that stock liquidity will promote R&D investment; (2) Stock liquidity significantly reduces financing constraints and second-class agency costs,thereby improving the R&D investment, and financing constraints and the second type of agency cost of the enterprise play a partial intermediary role in the process of stock liquidity affecting R&D investment; (3) The first type of agency cost plays a regulatory role in the process of stock liquidity affecting R&D investment. The higher cost of the first type of agency, the more significant the effect of stock liquidity on the R&D investment of enterprises. In order to overcome the endogeneity of the model, this paper chooses margin financing business as a quasi-natural experiment. By constructing the propensity matching score and the double difference estimation model, the results still support the research conclusions of this paper.

Key words: Stock Liquidity, R&D Investment, Financing Constraint, Agency Cost

中图分类号:

F830.91

董竹, 张欣, 李雨奇. 股票流动性对企业研发投入的影响——融资约束和代理成本的中介作用与调节作用[J]. 财经论丛, 2020, 36(8): 73-82.

DONG Zhu, ZHANG Xin, LI Yuqi. The Impact of Stock Liquidity on Corporate R&D Investment: The Mediating Effect and Moderating Effect of Financing Constraint and Agency Cost[J]. , 2020, 36(8): 73-82.

参考文献

[1] Fang V.W.,TianX.,Tice S. Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?[J]. The Journal of Finance,2014,69(5):2085-2125.
[2] 冯根福,刘虹,冯照桢,等. 股票流动性会促进我国企业技术创新吗?[J]. 金融研究,2017,(3):192-206.
[3] 闫红蕾,赵胜民. 上市公司股票流动性对企业创新的促进作用[J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2018,(2):98-112.
[4] Stein J. Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1988,96:61-80.
[5] Shleifer A.,Summers L.H. Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,1987,11(1).
[6] Porter M.E.,Porter M.E. Capital Disadvantage: America's Failing Capital Investment System.[J]. Harvard Business Review,1992,70(5):65-82.
[7] Bushee B.J. The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior[J]. Accounting Review,1998,(3):305-333.
[8] Maug E. Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade-Off between Liquidity and Control?[J]. The Journal of Finance,1998,53(1): 65-98.
[9] Admati A.R.,Pfleiderer P. The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(7):2645-2685.
[10] Edmans A.,Manso G. Governance Through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,2011,24(7):2395-2428.
[11] Jiang F.,Kim K.A. Corporate Governance in China: A Modern Perspective[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2015,32:190-216.
[12] 李文贵,余明桂. 所有权性质、市场化进程与企业风险承担[J]. 中国工业经济,2012,(12):115-127.
[13] 黄张凯,徐信忠,岳云霞. 中国上市公司董事会结构分析[J]. 管理世界,2006,(11):128-134.
[14] Aghion P.,Reenen J. V.,Zingales L. Innovation and Institutional Ownership[J]. Cepr Discussion Papers,2013,(1):277-304.
[15] Amihud Y.,Mendelson H. Trading Mechanisms and Stock Returns: An Empirical Investigation[J]. Journal of Finance,1987,42(3):533-553.
[16] 熊家财,苏冬蔚. 股票流动性与企业资本配置效率[J]. 会计研究,2014,(11):54-60.
[17] 高志,刘爽,杨波. 股票流动性、代理冲突与我国上市公司治理效应[J]. 经济问题,2018,(9):74-80.
[18] Manso G. Motivating Innovation[J]. Journal of Finance,2011,66(5):1823-1860.
[19] Amihud Y. Illiquidity and Stock Returns Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects[J]. Journal of Financial Markets,2002,(1):31-56.
[20] 张杰,芦哲,郑文平,等. 融资约束、融资渠道与企业R&D投入[J]. 世界经济,2012,35(10):66-90.
[21] Brown J.R.,Fazzari S.M.,Petersen B.C. Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow,External Equity,and the 1990s R&D Boom[J]. Journal of Finance,2009,64(1):151-185.
[22] 夏冠军,陆根尧. 资本市场促进了高新技术企业研发投入吗?——基于中国上市公司动态面板数据的证据[J]. 科学学研究,2012,30(9):1370-1377.
[23] 曹廷求,刘海明. 发声—退出机制、流动性与公司治理研究进展[J]. 经济学动态,2015,(5):131-138.
[24] Norli Ø.,Ostergaard C.,Schindele I. Liquidity and Shareholder Activism[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2015,(2):486-520.
[25] Edmans A. Blockholder Trading,Market Efficiency,and Managerial Myopia[J]. The Journal of Finance,2009,(6):2481-2513.
[26] Edmans A.,Fang V.W.,Zur E. The Effect of Liquidity on Governance[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2013,(6):1443-1482.
[27] Johnson S.,Porta R.L.,Lopez-De-Silanes F. Tunneling[J]. American Economic Review,2000,90(2):22-27.
[28] 左晶晶,唐跃军,眭悦. 第二类代理问题、大股东制衡与公司创新投资[J]. 财经研究,2013,39(4):38-47.
[29] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.