谁决定了中美利差的起伏:内部均衡还是外部均衡？

财经论丛 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 49-60.

谁决定了中美利差的起伏:内部均衡还是外部均衡？

丁浩^1,2

1.中国东方资产管理股份有限公司博士后科研工作站,北京 100033;
2.中国社会科学院金融研究所博士后科研流动站,北京 100028

收稿日期:2019-04-12 出版日期:2021-03-10 发布日期:2021-03-17
作者简介:丁浩(1989-),男,湖南岳阳人,中国东方资产管理股份有限公司博士后科研工作站、中国社会科学院金融研究所博士后科研流动站联合培养博士后。

What Decides the Ups and Downs of China-US Treasury Yield Spread: Internal Equilibrium or External Equilibrium?

DING Hao^1,2

1. Postdoctoral Research Station, China Orient Asset Management Co., Ltd., Beijing 100033, China;
2. Postdoctoral Research Station, Institute of Finance, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100028, China

Received:2019-04-12 Online:2021-03-10 Published:2021-03-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于2002Q2～2019Q4的季度数据,采用格兰杰因果检验、方差分解和TVP-VAR模型,分析了我国经济内外均衡状况对中美利差影响的时变特征。研究发现:(1)从影响程度来看,内部均衡对中美利差的影响整体高于外部均衡;(2)从时间序列来看,无论是等间隔脉冲响应函数,还是时点脉冲响应函数,均发现内部均衡和外部均衡对中美利差的影响随时间变化而不断减弱;(3)通过理论分析结合格兰杰因果检验,证实了因果效应,即内部均衡与外部均衡均是中美利差的格兰杰原因。本研究对合理搭配宏观经济政策、推动经济高质量发展具有重要的实践意义。

关键词: 内部均衡, 外部均衡, 中美利差, 国债收益率

Abstract: Based on the quarterly data from the second quarter of 2002 to the fourth quarter of 2019, this paper uses the Granger causality test, the variance decomposition and the TVP-VAR model to analyze the time-varying characteristics of the influence of the internal and external equilibrium of China's economy on the China-US treasury yield spread. The findings are as follows: (1) In terms of the influence degree, the influence of the internal equilibrium on China-US treasury yield spread is higher than that of the external equilibrium. (2) From the perspective of time series, it is found that the influence of the internal equilibrium and the external equilibrium on China-US treasury yield spread is on the decrease over time whether it is the equal interval impulse response function or the time point impulse response function. (3) By combining theoretical analysis with the Granger causality test, it is proved that both the internal equilibrium and the external equilibrium are granger reasons for the China-US treasury yield spread. This study is of great practical significance to make a good macroeconomic policy coordination and to promote a highquality economic development.

Key words: Internal Equilibrium, External Equilibrium, China and US Treasury Yield Spread, Treasury Bond Yield

中图分类号:

F822.2

丁浩. 谁决定了中美利差的起伏:内部均衡还是外部均衡？[J]. 财经论丛, 2021, 37(3): 49-60.

DING Hao. What Decides the Ups and Downs of China-US Treasury Yield Spread: Internal Equilibrium or External Equilibrium?[J]. , 2021, 37(3): 49-60.

参考文献

[1] 舒理. 利差交易对中国金融市场的影响[J]. 经济研究参考, 2014,(54):21-21.
[2] 金春雨, 张龙. 美联储货币政策对中国经济的冲击[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017,(1):25-42.
[3] 胥爱欢. 美联储货币政策效应对中国经济增长的影响:基于TVP-VAR-SV模型的省际研究[J]. 世界经济研究, 2018,(4):42-50,137-138.
[4] Estrella A. , Hardouvelis G. A. The Term Structure as a Predictor of Real Economic Activity[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1991, 46(2):555-576.
[5] Estrella A. , Mishkin F. S. The Yield Curve as a Predictor of U.S. Recessions[J]. Current Issues in Economics & Finance, 1996, 2(7):1-6.
[6] 李琦. 中国债券收益率曲线对经济增长的预测能力分析[J]. 南方金融, 2012,(6):23-27.
[7] 王金明. 利差能否预警我国经济周期的阶段转换?——基于MS-TVTP模型的实证分析[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2018,(1):85-93.
[8] Clarida R. , Sarno L. , Taylor M. P. , et al. The Out-of-Sample Success of Term Structure Models as Exchange Rate Predictors: A Step Beyond[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2003, 60(1):61-83.
[9] 纪志宏. 货币政策与国债收益率曲线[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2003,(3):42-46.
[10] 袁志辉. 中国债券市场期限利差投资价值与决定因素[J]. 债券, 2015,(12):56-62.
[11] 贾彦乐, 乔桂明, 朱鸿涛. 长短期国债期限利差的宏观经济影响因素实证分析——基于中美两国的比较[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017,(5):135-142.
[12] Bernanke B. S. On the Predictive Power of Interest Rates and Interest Rate Spreads[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1990,(11):51-68.
[13] 黄文涛, 郑凌怡. 期限利差的周期之轮[J]. 债券, 2016,(9):67-75.
[14] Mucai Lin, Linlin Niu. Echo over the Great Wall: Spillover Effects of QE Announcements on Chinese Yield Curve[Z]. Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University,Working Paper,2019-05-17.
[15] 钟红, 王有鑫. 美债收益率上涨原因、趋势及影响[J]. 债券, 2018,(7):16-20.
[16] 张谊浩, 裴平, 方先明. 中国的短期国际资本流入及其动机——基于利率、汇率和价格三重套利模型的实证研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2007,(9):41-52.
[17] Blanchard O. J., Dell'Ariccia G., Mauro P. Rethinking Macro Policy II: Getting Granular[R]. IMF Staff Discussion Note,2013.
[18] 刘骏斌, 刘晓星. 美元加息、人民币汇率与短期跨国资本流动——基于适应性预期的视角[J]. 财经科学, 2017,(8):38-52.
[19] Warnock F. E., Warnock V. C. International Capital Flows and US Interest Rates[J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2009, 28(6): 903-919.
[20] Favero C., Pagano M., Von Thadden E. L. How Does Liquidity Affect Government Bond Yields?[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2010, 45(1): 107-134.
[21] Arslanalp S., Poghosyan T. Foreign Investor Flows and Sovereign Bond Yields in Advanced Economies[J]. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, 2016,2(6): 45-67.
[22] 郑鸬捷. 中美利差与国内债券市场[J]. 金融市场研究, 2018,(5):118-127.
[23] Bernanke B. Why Are Interest Rates So Low? [EB/OL]. www.brookings.edu/blog/ben-bernanke/2015/03/30/why-are-interest-rates-so-low, 2015.
[24] Claude G., Pete R., Deborah R., Paul V. D. N. Estimating Potential Output, Output Gaps and Structural Budget Balances[Z]. OECD Publishing, 1995, 24:167-209.
[25] 陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用(第二版)[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2014.
[26] Primiceri G. E. Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2005, 72(3): 821-852.
[27] Nakajima J. Time-varying Parameter VAR Model with Stochastic Volatility: An Overview of Methodology and Empirical Applications[J]. Monetary and Economic Studies, 2011, 29:107-142.
[28] 孙焱林, 张倩婷. 时变、美联储加息与中国产出——基于TVP-VAR模型的实证分析[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016, (4):26-36.
[29] 中国人民银行广州分行课题组. 美国货币政策对中国产出的溢出效应 ——基于TVP-VAR-SV模型的研究[J]. 南方金融, 2016,(12):3-25.
[30] 姜波克, 杨长江. 国际金融学[M]. 上海:立信会计出版社, 1998.
[31] 徐长生, 苏应蓉. 从新斯旺模型看我国利率与汇率政策的组合[J]. 国际金融研究, 2006,(12):53-59.