地方政府债务影响企业社会责任履行吗？

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地方政府债务风险问题引起了政府和学术界高度关注。本文以企业社会责任履行为切入点,考察地方政府债务对微观企业行为的影响。基于2015—2019年全国31个省级面板数据,实证分析了地方政府债务对企业社会责任履行的影响与传导机制。研究结果表明,地方政府负债率与企业社会责任评级呈负向关系,地方政府债务规模扩张,会降低辖区企业履行社会责任的意愿和表现。机制分析表明,地方政府债务扩张通过加剧辖区企业的融资约束程度,进而降低企业社会责任的履行。异质性分析发现,市场化水平较低、行业竞争较激烈以及高杠杆率的企业,地方政府债务对其社会责任履行的影响效应尤为显著。本文将地方政府债务微观经济后果的研究拓展至企业社会责任领域,对于全面评估地方政府债务风险、促进企业社会责任履行具有一定的政策启示。

关键词: 地方政府债务, 企业社会责任, 融资约束, 微观经济后果

Abstract: In recent years, the problem of local government debt risk has attracted great attention from the government and academia. Taking the performance of corporate social responsibility as the starting point, the impact of local government debt on microenterprise behavior. Based on the panel data of 31 provinces in China from 2015 to 2019, empirically analyzes the impact and transmission mechanism. The results show that there is a negative relationship between local government debt ratio and corporate social responsibility rating, indicating that the expansion of local government debt will reduce the willingness and performance of enterprises in their jurisdiction to fulfill social responsibility. Echanism analysis shows that local government debt expansion reduces the performance of corporate social responsibility by aggravating the financing constraints of enterprises. Eterogeneity analysis that for enterprises with low marketization level, fierce industry competition and high leverage ratio, the impact of local government debt on the performance of corporate social responsibility is particularly significant. This paper extends the research on the microeconomic consequences of local government debt to the field of corporate social responsibility, which has certain policy enlightenment for comprehensively evaluating the risk of local government debt and promoting the performance of corporate social responsibility.

Key words: Local Government Debt, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financing Constraints, Microeconomic Consequences

中图分类号:

F230

唐玮, 胡超, 赵燕. 地方政府债务影响企业社会责任履行吗？[J]. 财经论丛, 2022, 38(10): 71-80.

TANG Wei, HU Chao, ZHAO Yan. Will Local Government Debt Affect the Performance of Corporate Social Responsibility?[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2022, 38(10): 71-80.

参考文献

[1]毛捷, 黄春元. 地方债务、区域差异与经济增长——基于中国地级市数据的验证[J]. 金融研究, 2018, (5): 1-19.
[2]Chen Z., He Z. G., Liu C.. The Financing of Local Government in China: Stimulus Loan Wanes and Shadow Banking Waxes[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2020, 137(7): 42-71.
[3]Eden M., Kraay A. “Crowding”in and the Returns to Government Investment in Low-income Countries[Z]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6781, 2014.
[4]Demirci I., Huang J., Sialm C. Government Debt and Corporate Leverage: International Evidence[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 133(2) : 337-356.
[5]Li S. J., Cao P. S. Does Local Government Debt Promote China's New Urbanization? [J]. Chinese Economy Journal, 2020, 53(4): 342-354.
[6]白重恩, 张琼. 中国的资本回报率及其影响因素分析[J]. 世界经济, 2014, (10): 3-30.
[7]Huang Y., Pagano M., Panizza U. Local Crowding-Out in China[J]. Journal of Finance, 2020, 75(8): 2855-2898.
[8]李红权, 尹盼盼. 我国地方政府债务的收入分配效应研究[J]. 金融评论, 2019, (6): 86-97,123.
[9]郝毅, 李政. 土地财政、地方政府债务与宏观经济波动研究——以地方政府投融资平台为例[J]. 当代经济科学, 2017, (1): 1-12, 124.
[10]Chikore R., Gachira W. Crowding in and Crowding out Effects of Debt Financed and Tax Financed Public Expenditure on Private Investment in Zimbabwe[J]. International Research Journal of Applied Finance, 2012, 3(8): 1180-1189.
[11]Sheldon O. The Social Responsibility of Management, the Philosophy of Management[M]. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd., 1924.
[12]Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Organization Studies, 2003, 24(3): 403-441.
[13]吴德军. 公司治理、媒体关注与企业社会责任[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2016, (5): 110-117.
[14]周中胜, 何德旭, 李正. 制度环境与企业社会责任履行: 来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2012, (10): 59-68.
[15]Knudsen J. S., Moon J., Slager R. Government Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Institutionalisation[J]. Policy and Politics, 2015, 43(1): 81-99.
[16]卢洪友, 唐飞, 许文立. 税收政策能增强企业的环境责任吗——来自我国上市公司的证据[J]. 财贸研究, 2017, (1): 85-91.
[17]余东华, 邱璞. 产业政策偏好、社会责任属性与民营企业绩效[J]. 财经问题研究, 2017, (7): 20-27.
[18]郝增慧. 政策不确定性与企业社会责任——基于地方官员变更的视角[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2020, (4): 94-108.
[19]郭玉清, 何杨, 李龙. 救助预期、公共池激励与地方政府举债融资的大国治理[J]. 经济研究, 2016, (3): 81-95.
[20]胡援成, 张文君. 地方政府债务扩张与银行信贷风险[J]. 财经论丛, 2012, (3): 59-65.
[21]陈峻, 郑惠琼. 融资约束、客户议价能力与企业社会责任[J]. 会计研究, 2020, (8): 50-63.
[22]杨华领, 宋常. 地方政府债务、产权属性与公司税负[J]. 财经论丛, 2015, (8): 27-36.
[23]于文超, 殷华, 梁平汉. 税收征管、财政压力与企业融资约束[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (1): 100-118.
[24]沈丽, 刘媛, 刘华军, 等. 地方政府债务风险的空间溢出及其解释——基于关系数据的研究[J]. 财政研究, 2019, (3): 79-92.
[25]熊琛, 金昊. 地方政府债务风险与金融部门风险的“双螺旋”结构——基于非线性DSGE模型的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (12): 23-41.
[26]熊虎, 沈坤荣. 地方政府债务对创新的挤出效应研究[J]. 经济科学, 2019, (4): 5-17.
[27]冉戎, 王丁, 谢懿. 非政府组织关联、责任战略延续性与融资约束[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, (3): 178-192.
[28]Goss A., Roberts G. S. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2011, 35(7): 1794-1810.
[29]Porter M. E., Linde C. V. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995, 73(5): 120-134.
[30]顾雷雷, 郭建鸾, 王鸿宇. 企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, (2): 109-127.
[31]Sims G. C. Rethinking the Political Power of American Business: the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility[M]. California: Stanford University, 2003.
[32]贾兴平, 刘益. 外部环境、内部资源与企业社会责任[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, (6): 13-18, 52.
[33]余海跃, 康书隆. 地方政府债务扩张、企业融资成本与投资挤出效应[J]. 世界经济, 2020, (7): 49-72.
[34]刁伟涛, 傅巾益. 我国县级政府债务风险的分类度量、区域分布和变化特征: 2015—2017[J]. 财政研究, 2019, (5): 58-76.
[35]刘馨月, 金兆怀. 人口流动、财政分权与地方政府债务——基于省级面板数据的经验分析[J]. 经济问题, 2021, (5): 63-70.
[36]石璋铭, 谢存旭. 银行竞争、融资约束与战略性新兴产业技术创新[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2015, (8): 117-126.
[37]翟胜宝, 易旱琴, 郑洁, 等. 银企关系与企业投资效率——基于我国民营上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2014, (4): 74-80, 96.
[38]宋美喆. 财政竞争、资源错配与经济波动——基于共同因子的动态空间杜宾面板数据模型的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021, (3): 14-26.
[39]谭雪. 行业竞争、产权性质与企业社会责任信息披露——基于信号传递理论的分析[J]. 产业经济研究, 2017, (3): 15-28.
[40]王玉泽, 罗能生, 刘文彬. 什么样的杠杆率有利于企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, (3): 138-155.