“减税降费”对制造业间接税有效税率的影响研究——基于投入产出税收价格模型的分析

财经论丛 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 32-40.

“减税降费”对制造业间接税有效税率的影响研究——基于投入产出税收价格模型的分析

杨志安, 付正淦, 邱国庆

辽宁大学经济学院,辽宁沈阳 110031

收稿日期:2022-03-21 出版日期:2022-11-10 发布日期:2022-11-22
作者简介:杨志安(1963—),男,辽宁绥中人,辽宁大学经济学院教授,博士;付正淦(1997—),男,山东滕州人,辽宁大学经济学院博士生,通信作者;邱国庆(1991—),男,辽宁瓦房店人,辽宁大学经济学院副教授,博士。
基金资助:
辽宁省教育厅新型智库项目(LZK202003);辽宁省哲学社会科学青年人才培养对象委托课题(2022lslwtkt-033);辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目(L21CGL016)

The Impact of “Tax Reduction and Fee Reduction” on the Effective Tax Rate of Indirect Tax in Manufacturing Industry: An Analysis Based on Tax Price Input-output Model

YANG Zhian, FU Zhenggan, QIU Guoqing

School of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110031, China

Received:2022-03-21 Online:2022-11-10 Published:2022-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文选取2010—2019年全国分产业、分税种数据,利用RAS法延长可用投入产出表,测算制造业有效税率。结果如下:第一,“减税降费”使制造业间接税有效税率降低了3.07%,其中2016年全面“营改增”的减税效应小于2019年制造业留抵退税与增值税一般税率下调的减税效应;第二,制造业间接税的减税效应是“营改增”扩围、增值税与消费税变动和税负转嫁综合的结果;第三,资源密集型制造业在改革中获益最大,劳动密集型制造业获益最小;第四,“减税降费”后,各类型制造业间接税有效税率差异进一步缩小。

关键词: 减税降费, 税收转嫁, 实征税收, 归宿税收

Abstract: With the data of national industries and tax categories from 2010 to 2019, this paper extends the available input-output table RAS method to calculate the effective tax rate of manufacturing industry. The results are as follows. First, the “tax reduction and fee reduction” has reduced the effective tax rate of indirect tax of manufacturing industry by 3.07%. Specially, the tax reduction effect of the comprehensive “replacing business tax with value-added tax” in 2016 is smaller than that of the manufacturing tax rebate and the reduction of the general tax rate of value-added tax in 2019. Second, the tax reduction effect of indirect tax in manufacturing industry is the result of the expansion of “replacing business tax with value-added tax”, the changes of value-added tax and consumption tax, and the transfer of tax burden. Third, the resource intensive manufacturing industry benefited the most from the reform, while the labor-intensive manufacturing industry benefited the least. Finally, after the “tax reduction and fee reduction”, the difference in the effective tax rate of indirect tax on various types of manufacturing industry further narrowed.

Key words: Tax Reduction and Fee Reduction, Tax Transfer, Actual Tax, Destination Tax

中图分类号:

F812.42

杨志安, 付正淦, 邱国庆. “减税降费”对制造业间接税有效税率的影响研究——基于投入产出税收价格模型的分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2022, 38(11): 32-40.

YANG Zhian, FU Zhenggan, QIU Guoqing. The Impact of “Tax Reduction and Fee Reduction” on the Effective Tax Rate of Indirect Tax in Manufacturing Industry: An Analysis Based on Tax Price Input-output Model[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2022, 38(11): 32-40.

参考文献

[1]刘佐. 中国直接税与间接税比重变化趋势研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2010, (7): 40-43.
[2]聂海峰, 刘怡. 增值税和营业税行业税负差异研究 [J]. 税务研究, 2011, (10): 7-13.
[3]萧艳汾. 营业税改征增值税经济影响的测算分析 [J]. 税务研究, 2013, (4): 32-36.
[4]包燕萍. 房地产行业税负水平及其影响因素分析 [J]. 统计与决策, 2019 , (12): 163-166.
[5]姜明耀. 增值税“扩围”改革对行业税负的影响——基于投入产出表的分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2011, (2): 11-16.
[6]潘文轩. 增值税扩围改革有助于减轻服务业税负吗?——基于投入产出表的分析[J]. 上海经济研究, 2012, (4): 115-120.
[7]杜莉, 刘念, 蔡至欣. 金融业营改增的减税效应——基于行业关联的视角 [J]. 税务研究, 2019, (5): 34-41.
[8]Metcalf G. E. A Distributional Analysis of Green Tax Reforms[J]. National Tax Journal, 1999, 52(4): 655-681.
[9]Rajemison H., Haggblade S., Younger S. D. Indirect Tax Incidence in Madagascar: Updated Estimates Using the Input-output Table[Z]. CFNPP Working Paper, 2003.
[10]Jonathan H., Nguyen T. Q., Nguyen H. B. Tax Incidence in Vietnam [J]. Asian Economic Journal, 2006, 20(2): 217-239.
[11]何其祥. 投入产出分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1999.
[12]聂海峰, 刘怡. 城镇居民的间接税负担: 基于投入产出表的估算 [J]. 经济研究, 2010, (7): 31-42.
[13]倪红福, 龚六堂, 王茜萌. “营改增”的价格效应和收入分配效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016, (12): 23-39.
[14]施文泼, 贾康. 我国增值税“扩围”改革的必要性[J]. 经济研究参考, 2011, (12): 19.
[15]王金霞. 扩大增值税范围的思考[J]. 税务研究, 2009, (8): 48-50.
[16]平新乔, 梁爽, 郝朝艳, 等. 增值税与营业税的税负[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2010 , (3): 6-12.
[17]田志伟, 胡怡建. “营改增”对各行业税负影响的动态分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2013, (4): 29-34.
[18]Stone R. A. Input-output Accounts and National Accounts[M]Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1961.
[19]唐小我. RAS方法的改进算法[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 1992 , (1): 98-103.
[20]刘波. 基于矩阵转换技术的区域投入产出表预测[J]. 统计学报, 2021, (5): 1-8.
[21]聂海峰, 岳希明. 间接税归宿对城乡居民收入分配影响研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2013, (1): 287-312.
[22]魏玮, 张万里. 不同要素密集型制造业集聚对效率的非线性影响研究——基于负外部性的PSTR实证分析[J]. 经济经纬, 2015, (1): 72-77.
[23]张万里, 魏玮. 要素密集度、产业集聚与生产率提升——来自中国企业微观数据的经验研究[J]. 财贸研究, 2018, (7): 28-41.
[24]Friendlander D. A Technique for Estimating a Contingency Table, Given the Marginal Totals and Some Supplement Data [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 1961, 124(3): 412-420.
[25]王韬, 马成, 叶文奇. 投入产出表、社会核算矩阵的更新方法研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011, (11): 112-123.
[26]刘怡, 聂海峰. 间接税负担对收入分配的影响分析 [J]. 经济研究, 2004, (5): 22-30.