地域投机文化加剧了实体企业“脱实向虚”吗？——来自我国上市企业的证据

财经论丛 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 45-54.

地域投机文化加剧了实体企业“脱实向虚”吗？——来自我国上市企业的证据

傅颀, 胡港夏

浙江财经大学会计学院,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2022-04-14 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-02-14
作者简介:傅颀(1979—),女,浙江绍兴人,浙江财经大学会计学院教授,博士;胡港夏(1997—),女,浙江金华人,浙江财经大学会计学院硕士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71802177)

Will Regional Speculative Culture Aggravate Real Enterprises' Problem of “from Real to Virtual”? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

FU Qi, HU Gangxia

School of Accounting, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2022-04-14 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-02-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 投机文化作为一种非正式制度,会对企业行为产生重要影响。本文利用2008—2020年我国A股上市企业数据,考察了地域投机文化与实体企业金融资产配置决策之间的关系。研究发现:企业经营所在地的投机文化氛围越浓厚,企业金融化程度越高;机制检验表明,增加代理成本和提升管理层过度自信水平是地域投机文化影响企业金融化的重要路径;异质性分析发现,培育良好的地区法制环境、提高外部监督水平以及强化企业内部控制质量能够有效削弱投机文化对企业金融化造成的负面效应。本文的研究结论为治理我国实体企业“脱实向虚”提供了新思路,也从侧面揭示了营造良好的非正式制度环境对企业资源配置决策的重要性,对于防范化解系统性风险,引领我国资本市场健康有序发展具有重要意义。

关键词: 投机文化, 金融化, 脱实向虚

Abstract: As an informal institution, the speculative culture has an important impact on corporate behavior. Based on a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2020, this paper examines the influence of the regional speculative culture on corporate financial asset allocation decisions. Our study finds that the stronger the speculative culture atmosphere in the place where the company operates, the higher the level of corporate financialization; moreover, the analysis of mechanism suggests that increasing agency costs and improving management's overconfidence level are important paths for the speculative culture to affect corporate financialization; further analysis finds that fostering a good regional legal environment, improving the level of external supervision and strengthening the quality of internal control of enterprises can weaken the negative effects of the speculative culture on corporate financialization. These conclusions provide new ideas for the governance of the current phenomenon of “from real to virtual” in Chinese real enterprises, and also reveal the importance of creating a good informal institutional environment for enterprise resource allocation decisions, which is of great practical significance for preventing and resolving systemic risks, guiding the healthy and orderly development of China's capital market.

Key words: Speculative Culture, Financialization, from Real to Virtual

中图分类号:

F832.5

傅颀, 胡港夏. 地域投机文化加剧了实体企业“脱实向虚”吗？——来自我国上市企业的证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2023, 39(2): 45-54.

FU Qi, HU Gangxia. Will Regional Speculative Culture Aggravate Real Enterprises' Problem of “from Real to Virtual”? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2023, 39(2): 45-54.

参考文献

[1]张成思, 张步昙. 中国实业投资率下降之谜:经济金融化视角[J]. 经济研究, 2016, (12): 32-46.
[2]杨筝, 王红建, 戴静, 等. 放松利率管制、利润率均等化与实体企业“脱实向虚”[J]. 金融研究, 2019, (6): 20-38.
[3]顾雷雷, 郭建鸾, 王鸿宇. 企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, (2): 109-127.
[4]李馨子, 牛煜皓, 张广玉. 客户集中度影响企业的金融投资吗?[J]. 会计研究, 2019, (9): 65-70.
[5]胡妍, 向海凌, 吴非. 股票流动性与企业脱实向虚:促进还是抑制——基于博彩文化的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2021,(2): 37-47.
[6]Li K., Griffin D. W., Yue H., et al. How does Culture Influence Corporate Risk-Taking?[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013, 23(4): 1-22.
[7]Chen Y. Y., Podolski E. J., Rhee S. G., et al. Local Gambling Preferences and Corporate Innovative Success[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2014, 49(1): 77-106.
[8]陈欣, 陈德球. 投机文化、管理者特征与公司创新[J]. 管理评论, 2021, (1): 133-143.
[9]罗党论, 刘聪聪, 谭衍俊. 投机文化与控股股东股权质押行为[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (10): 69-83.
[10]谢露, 翟胜宝, 童丽静. 博彩文化与企业费用粘性[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (5): 121-132.
[11]戴赜, 彭俞超, 马思超. 从微观视角理解经济“脱实向虚”——企业金融化相关研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018,(11): 31-43.
[12]彭俞超, 刘代民, 顾雷雷. 减税能缓解经济“脱实向虚”吗?——来自上市公司的证据[J]. 税务研究, 2017, (8): 93-97.
[13]宋迪, 杨超. 控股股东股权质押与金融化投资研究——基于风险与收益的中介效应检验[J]. 财经论丛, 2022,(8): 49-57.
[14]王瑶, 黄贤环. 内部控制与实体企业金融化: 治理效应抑或助推效应[J]. 财经科学, 2020, (2): 26-38.
[15]杨兴全, 张方越, 杨征. 社会资本与企业金融化: 正向助推还是负向抑制[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2021, (4): 3-17.
[16]翟淑萍, 甦叶, 缪晴. 社会信任与实体企业金融化——“蓄势谋远”还是“借势取利”[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2021, (6): 56-69.
[17]Alesina A., Giuliano P. Culture and Institutions[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2016, 53(4): 898-944.
[18]曾爱民, 魏志华. 宗教传统影响股价崩盘风险吗?——基于“信息披露”和“管理自律”的双重视角[J]. 经济管理, 2017,(11): 134-148.
[19]徐细雄, 李万利. 儒家传统与企业创新: 文化的力量[J]. 金融研究, 2019, (9): 112-130.
[20]赵奇锋, 赵文哲, 卢荻, 等. 博彩与企业创新: 基于文化视角的研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2018, (9): 122-140.
[21]Chami R., Fullenkamp C. Trust and Efficiency[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2002, (9): 1785-1809.
[22]Spurrier M., Blaszczynski A., Rhodes P. Gambler Risk Perception: A Mental Model and Grounded Theory Analysis[J]. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2015, 31(3): 887-906.
[23]张成思, 郑宁. 中国实体企业金融化: 货币扩张、资本逐利还是风险规避?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, (9): 1-19.
[24]Petersen M. A. Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches[J]. The Review Of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(1): 435-480.
[25]姜付秀, 张敏, 陆正飞, 等. 管理者过度自信、企业扩张与财务困境[J]. 经济研究, 2009, (1): 131-143.
[26]方红星, 张勇, 王平. 法制环境、供应链集中度与企业会计信息可比性[J]. 会计研究, 2017, (7): 33-40,96.
[27]王小鲁, 樊纲, 余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017.
[28]Chung K. H., Jo H. The Impact of Security Analysts' Monitoring and Marketing Functions on the Market Value of Firms[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996, 31(4): 493-512.
[29]Abbott L. J., Parker S., Peters G. F., et al. Corporate Governance, Audit Quality, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Evidence from Internal Audit Outsourcing[J]. Accounting Review, 2007, 82(4): 803-835.
[30]周美华, 林斌, 林东杰. 管理层权力、内部控制与腐败治理[J]. 会计研究, 2016, (3): 56-63,96.