非国有股东参与治理发挥了“鲶鱼效应”吗？——基于国企战略定位视角

财经论丛 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 70-81.

非国有股东参与治理发挥了“鲶鱼效应”吗？——基于国企战略定位视角

王瑶¹, 侯德帅², 徐道胜³

1.中国石油大学(北京)经济管理学院,北京 102249;
2.首都经济贸易大学会计学院,北京 100070;
3.中国人民大学商学院,北京 100872

收稿日期:2022-01-04 出版日期:2023-03-10 发布日期:2023-03-13
作者简介:王瑶(1995—),女,湖北随州人,中国石油大学(北京)经济管理学院讲师;侯德帅(1985—),男,河南新乡人,首都经济贸易大学会计学院副教授,通信作者;徐道胜(1998—),男,山东聊城人,中国人民大学商学院博士生。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(21YJC630167);中国石油大学(北京)科研基金项目(2462021YJRC019)

Does the Participation of Non-state-owned Shareholders in Governance Play a “Catfish Effect”?From the Perspective of Strategic Positioning of SOEs

WANG Yao¹, HOU Deshuai², XU Daosheng³

1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. School of Accounting, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China;
3. Business School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received:2022-01-04 Online:2023-03-10 Published:2023-03-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 优化战略定位、促进高质量发展是国企混改的重要方向。非国有股东作为“内部人”参与国企公司治理,能否发挥“鲶鱼效应”,激发国企活力,更是实践与理论关注的重点。据此,本文从国企战略定位视角,研究发现非国有股东参与治理显著提升了国有企业战略激进度。拓展性分析发现此影响主要存在于地方国有企业以及市场化水平较低地区的国有企业。进一步研究发现非国有股东参与治理主要通过增加研发投入、促进员工流动、降低资本密集度提升了国有企业的战略激进度,并且战略激进度的提升最终有助于增加国企价值。本文研究表明非国有股东参与治理发挥了“鲶鱼效应”,不仅丰富了国企混改经济后果的相关文献,也为继续深入推进国企混改提供了新的证据支持。

关键词: 国有企业, 混合所有制改革, 非国有股东治理, 战略激进度

Abstract: Optimizing strategic positioning and promoting high-quality development is an important direction of the mixed reform of state-owned enterprises. Whether the participation of non-state-owned shareholders, as “insiders”, in corporate governance can exert the “catfish effect” and stimulate the vitality of state-owned enterprises is the focus of practice and theory. From the perspective of strategic positioning of state-owned enterprises, this paper finds that the participation of non-state-owned shareholders in governance improves the strategic radicalism of state-owned enterprises. The extended analysis shows that the influence mainly exists in local state-owned enterprises and state-owned enterprises in areas with low marketization level. Further research indicates that non-state-owned shareholders' participation in governance mainly improves the strategic radicalism of state-owned enterprises through increasing R&D investment, promoting employee turnover and reducing capital intensity, and the improvement of strategic radicalism ultimately increases the value of state-owned enterprises. This study shows that non-state-owned shareholders' participation in governance has played a “catfish effect”, which not only enriches the relevant literature on the economic consequences of the mixed reform, but also provides new evidence support for further promoting the mixed reform of state-owned enterprise.

Key words: State-owned Enterprises, Mixed Ownership Reform, Non-state-owned Shareholders' Governance, Strategic Radicalization

中图分类号:

F275

王瑶, 侯德帅, 徐道胜. 非国有股东参与治理发挥了“鲶鱼效应”吗？——基于国企战略定位视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2023, 39(3): 70-81.

WANG Yao, HOU Deshuai, XU Daosheng. Does the Participation of Non-state-owned Shareholders in Governance Play a “Catfish Effect”?From the Perspective of Strategic Positioning of SOEs[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2023, 39(3): 70-81.

参考文献

[1]郝阳, 龚六堂. 国有、民营混合参股与公司绩效改进[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (3): 122-135.
[2]王丽丽, 陈霞. 混合所有制改革与企业风险承担[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, (6): 504-518.
[3]李井林. 混合所有制改革有助于提升国有企业投资效率吗?[J]. 经济管理, 2021, (2): 56-70.
[4]朱磊, 陈曦, 王春燕. 国有企业混合所有制改革对企业创新的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2019, (11): 72-91.
[5]杨兴全, 任小毅, 杨征. 国企混改优化了多元化经营行为吗?[J]. 会计研究, 2020, (4): 58-75.
[6]杨兴全, 尹兴强. 国企混改如何影响公司现金持有?[J]. 管理世界, 2018, (11): 93-107.
[7]Porter M. E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors [M]. New York: FreePress, 1980.
[8]Zahra S., Covin J. Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(6): 451-478.
[9]Rajagopalan N., Spreitzer G. M. Toward a Theory of Strategic Change: A Multi-lens Perspective and Integrative Framework[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(1): 48-79.
[10]李春玲, 袁润森, 孙熠. 非国有股东治理与国企创新投入[J]. 预测, 2021, (1): 38-44.
[11]连燕玲, 周兵, 贺小刚, 等. 经营期望、管理自主权与战略变革[J]. 经济研究, 2015, (8): 31-44.
[12]韵江, 宁鑫, 暴莹. CEO过度自信与战略变革——基于“韧性效应”和“创造效应”的研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论: 1-24[2021-11-16]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20210910.1708.020.html.
[13]Chatterjee A., Hambrick D. C. It's All about Me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on Company Strategy and Performance [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2007, 52: 351-386.
[14]祝振铎, 李新春, 叶文平. “扶上马、送一程”: 家族企业代际传承中的战略变革与父爱主义[J]. 管理世界, 2018, (11): 65-79,196.
[15]刘运国, 郑巧, 蔡贵龙. 非国有股东提高了国有企业的内部控制质量吗?——来自国有上市公司的经验证据[J]会计研究, 2016, (11): 61-68,96.
[16]蔡贵龙, 柳建华, 马新啸. 非国有股东治理与国企高管薪酬激励[J]. 管理世界, 2018, (5): 137-149.
[17]曾诗韵, 蔡贵龙, 程敏英. 非国有股东能改善会计信息质量吗?——来自竞争性国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2017, (4): 28-44.
[18]马新啸, 汤泰劼, 郑国坚. 非国有股东治理与国有资本金融稳定——基于股价崩盘风险的视角[J]. 财经研究, 2021, (3): 35-49.
[19]张伟华, 高冰莹, 刘金钊. 混合所有制改革对国有企业冗余雇员的影响[J]. 中国软科学, 2021, (2): 98-110.
[20]马新啸, 汤泰劼, 郑国坚. 非国有股东治理与国有企业的税收规避和纳税贡献——基于混合所有制改革的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2021, (6): 128-141,8.
[21]叶永卫, 李增福. 国企“混改”与企业金融资产配置[J]. 金融研究, 2021, (3): 114-131.
[22]Miles R., Snow C., Meyer A., Coleman H. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3(3): 546-562.
[23]吴延兵. 国有企业双重效率损失研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012, (3): 15-27.
[24]John K., Litov L., Yeung B. Corporate Governance and Risk-taking[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(4): 1679-1728.
[25]Lin J. Y., Li Z. Policy Burden, Privatization and Soft Budget Constraint[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2008, 36 (1): 90-102.
[26]曾庆生, 陈信元. 国家控股、超额雇员与劳动力成本[J]. 经济研究, 2006, (5): 74-86.
[27]Boubakri N., Cosset J., Saffar W. The Role of State and Foreign Owners in Corporate Risk-taking: Evidence from Privatization[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2013, 108(3): 641-658.
[28]Bentley K. A., Omer T. C., Sharp N. Y. Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2013, (2): 780-817.
[29]王化成, 张修平, 高升好. 企业战略影响过度投资吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, (4): 87-97,110.
[30]王小鲁, 樊纲, 胡李鹏: 《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)》[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.
[31]温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, (5): 614-620.