从精准化到精细化:线上信息干预对绿色农产品消费决策过程的动态影响

财经论丛 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 89-100.

从精准化到精细化:线上信息干预对绿色农产品消费决策过程的动态影响

赵婧^1,2, 王建明^3,4

1.浙江农林大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州 311300;
2.浙江省新型重点专业智库“浙江农林大学生态文明研究院”,浙江杭州 311300;
3.浙江财经大学管理学院(MBA学院),浙江杭州 310018;
4.浙江省新型重点专业智库“中国政府监管与公共政策研究院”,浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2023-12-14 出版日期:2024-06-10 发布日期:2024-06-13
通讯作者: 王建明(1979—),男,江苏靖江人, 浙江财经大学管理学院(MBA学院)教授,浙江省新型重点专业智库“中国政府监管与公共政策研究院”研究员,博士。
作者简介:赵婧(1983—),女,黑龙江牡丹江人,浙江农林大学经济管理学院讲师,浙江省新型重点专业智库“浙江农林大学生态文明研究院”研究人员,博士。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(22YJC630212);浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LY24G020002);浙江农林大学科研发展基金项目(2022FR012)

From Accuracy to Agility: The Dynamic Impact of Digital Information Intervention on the Decision-Making Process of Green Agricultural Product Consumption

ZHAO Jing^1,2 , WANG Jianming^3,4

1. College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
2. The New Type Key Think Tank of zhejiang Province“Institute of Ecological Civilization, Zhejiang A&F University”, Hangzhou 311300, China;
3. School of Business Management, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China;
4. The New Type Key Think Tank of Zhejiang Province “China Research Institute of Regulation and Public Policy”, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2023-12-14 Online:2024-06-10 Published:2024-06-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 伴随农产品消费数智化渗透率的大幅提升,线上信息干预成为促进绿色农产品消费的重要手段。如何在聚焦消费者“买”或“不买”的人货精准化匹配的基础上,进一步基于消费者决策过程动态调整干预内容,对消费者进行“向善”“向绿”的精细化引导,是数智时代从需求端拉动农业绿色转型的前沿性议题。本文从绿色农产品属性信息切入,采用HMM与随机控制实验的混合研究方法,首先验证营养信息、环境信息及价格信息干预对消费者最终购买行为的影响效果,其次分析三种信息干预对消费者决策的动态推进过程,深入洞察消费者如何、何时改变了消费决策。研究发现:从消费者最终购买行为结果看,信息干预存在促进—抑制双因素、消费群体两极化的干预效果;从消费者决策过程看,信息干预对消费者决策过程存在激励—保健双因素作用效果,消费者的绿色农产品消费决策过程包含注意、兴趣、考虑和购买四种隐状态,三种信息干预对消费者隐性决策过程的推进效果存在明显差异。

关键词: 消费者决策过程, 绿色农产品, 信息干预, HMM, 随机控制实验

Abstract: With the significant penetration of intelligent consumption of agricultural products, online information intervention has become an important means to promote green agricultural product consumption on the demand side. On the basis of focusing on the precise matching of people and goods as to whether consumers “will buy” or “will not buy”, how to dynamically adjust intervention content based on consumer decision-making process to provide precise guidance for consumers to “do good” and “go green” is a cutting-edge issue, which drives agricultural green transformation from the demand side in the digital age. Based on the attribute information of green agricultural products, this paper adopts a mixed research method of HMM and random control experiments to verify the intervention effects of nutritional information, environmental information, and price information on consumers' final purchasing behavior, and then the dynamic promotion process of three types of information intervention on consumer decision-making is depicted. It is found that, from the perspective of the final purchasing behavior of consumers, information intervention has an intervention effect of promotion-inhibition dual factors and polarizing consumer groups; from the perspective of consumer decision-making process, information intervention has a dual effect of motivational and hygiene factors on consumer decision-making processes, and the green agricultural product consumption decision-making process includes four implicit states: attention, interest, consideration, and purchase. There are significant differences in the promotion effect of the three types of information intervention on the implicit decision-making process of consumers.

Key words: Consumer Decision-Making Process, Green Agricultural Products, Information Intervention, HMM, Random Control Experiment

中图分类号:

F713.55

赵婧, 王建明. 从精准化到精细化:线上信息干预对绿色农产品消费决策过程的动态影响[J]. 财经论丛, 2024, 40(6): 89-100.

ZHAO Jing , WANG Jianming. From Accuracy to Agility: The Dynamic Impact of Digital Information Intervention on the Decision-Making Process of Green Agricultural Product Consumption[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2024, 40(6): 89-100.

参考文献

[1]金书秦, 丁斐, 胡钰. 农产品碳标识赋能农业生态价值实现: 机理与建议[J]. 改革, 2022, (8): 57-66.
[2]朱俊峰, 邓远远. 农业生产绿色转型: 生成逻辑、困境与可行路径[J]. 经济体制改革, 2022, (3): 84-89.
[3]Hoyer W. D., Kroschke M., Schmitt B., et al. Transforming the Customer Experience through New Technologies[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2020, 51: 57-71.
[4]Cadario R., Chandon P. Viewpoint: Effectiveness or Consumer Acceptance? Tradeoffs in Selecting Healthy Eating Nudges[J]. Food Policy, 2019, 85: 1-6.
[5]何赛克, 张培杰, 张玮光, 等. 大模型时代下的决策范式转变[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, (4): 82-91.
[6]Massey M., O'cass A., Otahal P. A Meta-Analytic Study of the Factors Driving the Purchase of Organic Food[J]. Appetite, 2018, 125: 418-427.
[7]Delmas M. A., Gergaud O. Sustainable Practices and Product Quality: Is There Value in Eco-Label Certification? The Case of Wine[J]. Ecological Economics, 2021, 183: 1-16.
[8]De Bauw M., De La Revilla L. S., Poppe V., et al. Digital Nudges to Stimulate Healthy and Pro-Environmental Food Choices in E-Groceries[J]. Appetite, 2022, 172: 1-17.
[9]Czudec A. The Altruistic Behavior of Consumers Who Prefer a Local Origin of Organic Food[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(4): 567-579.
[10]Kushwah S., Dhir A., Sagar M., et al. Determinants of Organic Food Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review on Motives and Barriers[J]. Appetite, 2019, 143: 1-22.
[11]Kriwy P., Mecking R. A. Health and Environmental Consciousness, Costs of Behavior and the Purchase of Organic Food[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2012, 36(1): 30-37.
[12]Boobalan K., Nachimuthu G. S. Organic Consumerism: A Comparison between India and the USA[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020, 53: 1-8.
[13]Grosglik R. Citizen-Consumer Revisited: The Cultural Meanings of Organic Food Consumption in Israel[J]. Journal of Consumer Culture, 2016, 17(3): 732-751.
[14]Sánchez-Bravo P., Chambers V. E., Noguera-Artiaga L., et al. Consumer Understanding of Sustainability Concept in Agricultural Products[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2021, 89: 1-37.
[15]余伟萍, 毛振福. 广告信息框架对有机食品购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2019, (1): 130-133.
[16]陈炳霖, 薛可, 余明阳. 人工智能推荐产品类型对消费者采纳意愿的影响机理研究——基于算法透明度的调节作用[J]. 江西社会科学, 2023, (1): 194-205, 208.
[17]Danner H., Menapace L. Using Online Comments to Explore Consumer Beliefs Regarding Organic Food in German-Speaking Countries and The United States[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2020, 83: 1-12.
[18]Vlaeminck P., Jiang T., Vranken L. Food Labeling and Eco-Friendly Consumption: Experimental Evidence from a Belgian Supermarket[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 108: 180-190.
[19]Weber A. Mobile Apps as a Sustainable Shopping Guide: The Effect of Eco-Score Rankings on Sustainable Food Choice[J]. Appetite, 2021, 167: 1-12.
[20]Van Loo E. J., Hoefkens C., Verbeke W. Healthy, Sustainable and Plant-Based Eating: Perceived (Mis)Match and Involvement-Based Consumer Segments as Targets for Future Policy[J]. Food Policy, 2017, 69: 46-57.
[21]程玉桂. 有机食品可追溯与网络消费信任研究[J]. 江西社会科学, 2016, (4): 197-203.
[22]Nuttavuthisit K., Thøgersen J. The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 140(2): 323-37.
[23]Sultan P., Tarafder T., Pearson D., et al. Intention-Behavior Gap and Perceived Behavioral Control-Behavior Gap in Theory of Planned Behavior: Moderating Roles of Communication, Satisfaction and Trust in Organic Food Consumption[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2020, 81: 1-33.
[24]Kannan P. K., Li H. A. Digital Marketing: A Framework, Review and Research Agenda[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2017, 34(1): 22-45.
[25]Chen A., Lu Y., Wang B. Customers’ Purchase Decision-Making Process in Social Commerce: A Social Learning Perspective[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2017, 37(6): 627-638.
[26]高成, 朱虹, 乔均. 计算更多或感觉独特: 决策基础对产品属性可比偏好的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2021, (7): 203-215.
[27]Gao X., Xu X. Y., Tayyab S. M. U., et al. How the Live Streaming Commerce Viewers Process the Persuasive Message: An ELM Perspective and the Moderating Effect of Mindfulness[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2021, 49: 1-15.
[28]Lee L., Inman J. J., Argo J. J., et al. From Browsing to Buying and Beyond: The Needs-Adaptive Shopper Journey Model[J]. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2018, 3(3): 277-293.
[29]Bugshan H., Attar R. W. Social Commerce Information Sharing and Their Impact on Consumers[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 153: 1-8.
[30]O'Rourke D., Ringer A. The Impact of Sustainability Information on Consumer Decision Making[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2016, 20(4): 882-92.
[31]王建明, 赵婧. 数字时代信息嵌入式监管工具对线上绿色消费行为的推进效应——绿色购买场景模拟和监管工具设计实验[J]. 管理世界, 2022, (4): 142-162.
[32]Kukar-Kinney M., Scheinbaum A. C., Orimoloye L. O., et al. A Model of Online Shopping Cart Abandonment: Evidence From E-Tail Clickstream Data[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2022, 50(5): 961-80.
[33]Shocker A. D., Ben-Akiva M., Boccara B., et al. Consideration Set Influences on Consumer Decision-Making and Choice: Issues, Models, and Suggestions[J]. Marketing Letters, 1991, 2(3): 181-197.
[34]Netzer O., Lattin J. M., Srinivasan V. A Hidden Markov Model of Customer Relationship Dynamics[J]. Marketing Science, 2008, 27(2): 185-204.
[35]Han S., Han J. K., Im I., et al. Mapping Consumer's Cross-Device Usage for Online Search: Mobile- Vs. Pc-Based Search in the Purchase Decision Process[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 142: 387-399.
[36]Kim H., Jiang J., Bruce N. I. Discovering Heterogeneous Consumer Journeys in Online Platforms: Implications for Networking Investment[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 49(2): 374-396.