企业气候风险管理与股利平稳性

财经论丛 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 74-87.

企业气候风险管理与股利平稳性

甄皓晴¹, 何理¹, 孟小鹤¹, 冯科²

1.中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院,北京 102488;
2.北京大学经济学院,北京 100871

收稿日期:2025-12-18 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-09
通讯作者: 何理(1985—),男,湖北恩施人,中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院副教授
作者简介:甄皓晴(1997—),女,河北邯郸人,中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院博士生;孟小鹤(1999—),女,山东烟台人,中国社会科学院大学应用经济学院硕士生;冯科(1971—),男,广东河源人,北京大学经济学院教授。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目(23BJY072);中国社会科学院国情调研重大项目(2024GQZD019);中国社会科学院大学卓越研究项目(20260212)

Corporate Climate Risk Management and Dividend Stability

ZHEN Haoqing¹, HE Li¹, MENG Xiaohe¹, FENG Ke²

1. Faculty of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China;
2. School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2025-12-18 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着全球气候变化加剧和可持续发展目标日益迫切,企业气候风险管理正逐渐成为衡量其长期竞争力的重要指标,并对企业的经营波动与财务稳健性产生深远影响。本研究从企业股利平稳性的角度出发,基于中国A股上市公司2016—2024年的企业年报数据,利用Python爬虫技术和文本分析技术构建企业气候风险管理指标,探讨企业气候风险管理如何影响股利平稳性,分析其具体作用机制以及在不同性质企业中的表现。实证检验发现,企业加强气候风险管理会显著降低股利波动程度,提升股利平稳性。机制检验表明,企业加强气候风险管理通过融资效应、监督效应和治理效应提升股利平稳性。异质性分析显示,企业气候风险管理对股利平稳性的影响在成熟期、股利支付水平高和高碳绩效的企业中更为显著。本研究为气候风险冲击下企业财务决策和战略调整提供了理论参考和实践启示。

关键词: 气候风险管理, 股利政策, 股利平稳性, 融资约束, 内部治理

Abstract: As global climate change intensifies and the goal of pursuing sustainable development becomes increasingly urgent, corporate climate risk management has emerged as an important indicator to measure long-term competitiveness, which will have profound influence on corporate operational stability and financial resilience. From the perspective of dividend stability and based on the annual report data from China s A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2024, this study constructs a corporate climate risk management index by employing Python-based web scraping and advanced text analysis to examine how such risk management practices affect dividend stability. This study analyzes the underlying mechanisms and their manifestations among different types of enterprises. Empirical evidence reveals that enhanced climate risk management significantly mitigates dividend volatility, thereby fostering greater stability. Mechanistic analysis indicates that this effect operates well through financing, oversight, and governance channels. Heterogeneity tests further demonstrate that the stabilizing impact is more pronounced in mature firms, companies with higher dividend payout levels, and in enterprises exhibiting high carbon performance. These findings offer valuable theoretical guidance and practical insights for corporate financial decision-making and strategic planning in the face of climate-related shocks.

Key words: Climate Risk Management, Dividend Policy, Dividend Stability, Financing Constraints, Internal Governance

中图分类号:

F275
F205.2

甄皓晴, 何理, 孟小鹤, 冯科. 企业气候风险管理与股利平稳性[J]. 财经论丛, 2026, 42(10): 74-87.

ZHEN Haoqing, HE Li, MENG Xiaohe, FENG Ke. Corporate Climate Risk Management and Dividend Stability[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2026, 42(10): 74-87.

参考文献

[1] Chen W., Zhang Q. Can Corporate Climate Risk Drive Digital Transformation? Evidence from Chinese Heavy-polluting Enterprises[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2025, 212: 123990.
[2] 刘星, 陈名芹. 中国上市公司股利平稳性理论框架构建——基于国内外股利平稳性前沿研究的综述与分析[J]. 会计研究, 2016(4):61-69, 96.
[3] 李茂良, 李常青, 魏志华. 中国上市公司股利政策稳定吗——基于动态面板模型的实证研究[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2014(3): 33-42.
[4] Chemmanur T. J., He J., Hu G., et al. Is Dividend Smoothing Universal?: New Insights from a Comparative Study of Dividend Policies in Hong Kong and the US[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2010, 16(4): 413-430.
[5] Grennan J. Dividend Payments as a Response to Peer Influence[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 131(3): 549-570.
[6] 谢知非. 双重迎合与现金股利平稳性——基于中国A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2019(11):78-84.
[7] Rastogi S., Singh K. ESG and Dividend Distribution Decisions: Evidence of Moderation by Shareholder Activism[J]. Journal of Global Responsibility, 2025, 16(1): 22-36.
[8] 董竹, 柏向昱. 环境不确定性对股利平稳性的影响——基于股利信息内涵假说[J]. 数量经济研究, 2023(1):52-76.
[9] 王倩, 回禹杭. 气候风险对企业价值的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024(9):22-31.
[10] Chang C. L., Zhang J., Lin Y. E. Climate Policy Uncertainty, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Investments of the Energy Firms[J]. Energy Economics, 2024, 140: 107968.
[11] 李姝蓓, 何理, 冯科. 企业气候风险对供应商配置的影响研究[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2025(3):148-160.
[12] 杜剑, 徐筱彧, 杨杨. 气候风险影响权益资本成本吗?——来自中国上市公司年报文本分析的经验证据[J]. 金融评论, 2023(3):19-46.
[13] Li Q., Shan H., Tang Y., et al. Corporate Climate Risk: Measurements and Responses[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2024, 37(6): 1778-1830.
[14] Lintner J. Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings, and Taxes[J]. American Economic Review, 1956, 46(2): 97-113.
[15] Larkin Y., Leary M. T., Michaely R. Do Investors Value Dividend-smoothing Stocks Differently?[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(12): 4114-4136.
[16] Asimakopoulos P., Asimakopoulos S., Zhang A. Dividend Smoothing and Credit Rating Changes[J]. The European Journal of Finance, 2021, 27(1-2): 62-85.
[17] Salikhova T., Ugarov A., Orlova S. Dividend Smoothing and Financial Transparency[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024, 62(PA): 105152.
[18] 杨荣. 结构改革与债务周期[J]. 金融市场研究, 2016(7):17-29.
[19] Hultman N. E., Hassenzahl D. M., Rayner S. Climate Risk[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2010, 35: 283-303.
[20] Reboredo J. C., Ugolini A. Climate Transition Risk, Profitability and Stock Prices[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2022, 83: 102271.
[21] Zhong W., Jin L. The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation[J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(6): 2699.
[22] Feng L., Huang D., Chen F., et al. Leveraging Climate Risk Disclosure for Enhanced Corporate Innovation: Pathways to Sustainable and Resilient Business Practices[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, 96: 103724.
[23] 柳学信, 吴鑫玉, 孔晓旭. 企业气候风险管理:研究框架与未来展望[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2025(3):98-112.
[24] Xie Z., Yang M., Xu F. Carbon Emission Trading System and Stock Price Crash Risk of Heavily Polluting Listed Companies in China: Based on Analyst Coverage Mechanism[J]. Financial Innovation, 2023, 9(1): 71.
[25] Bai X., Han J., Ma Y., et al. ESG Performance, Institutional Investors' Preference and Financing Constraints: Empirical Evidence from China[J]. Borsa Istanbul Review, 2022, 22: S157-S168.
[26] 伊志宏, 杨圣之, 陈钦源. 分析师能降低股价同步性吗——基于研究报告文本分析的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(1): 156-173.
[27] 刘京军, 徐浩萍. 机构投资者:长期投资者还是短期机会主义者?[J]. 金融研究, 2012(9):141-154.
[28] 苏伟洲, 邓海洋, 郭四代. 气候风险对企业真实盈余管理程度的影响及作用机制研究——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2025(4):71-81.
[29] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021(7): 130-144.
[30] 陈国进, 陈凌凌, 金昊, 等. 气候转型风险与宏观经济政策调控[J]. 经济研究, 2023(5): 60-78.
[31] 陈艳利, 姜艳峰, 信志鹏. 股权集中度与股利平稳性——基于大股东掏空假说的分析和检验[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2020(9):85-98.
[32] 封志明, 唐焰, 杨艳昭, 等. 中国地形起伏度及其与人口分布的相关性[J]. 地理学报, 2007(10):1073-1082.
[33] Guo K., Ji Q., Zhang D. A Dataset to Measure Global Climate Physical Risk[J]. Data in Brief, 2024, 54: 110502.
[34] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
[35] 郭俊杰, 方颖. 绿色信贷、融资结构与企业环境投资[J]. 世界经济, 2022(8): 57-80.
[36] 王志芳, 李心月, 谭丽娜. 机构投资者持股与企业ESG信息策略性披露[J]. 经济问题, 2025(6):73-85.
[37] 王丹, 孙鲲鹏, 高皓. 社交媒体上“用嘴投票”对管理层自愿性业绩预告的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2020(11):188-206.
[38] 梁上坤, 张宇, 王彦超. 内部薪酬差距与公司价值——基于生命周期理论的新探索[J]. 金融研究, 2019(4):188-206.
[39] 何玉, 唐清亮, 王开田. 碳绩效与财务绩效[J]. 会计研究, 2017(2):76-82.