审慎监管有效性的实证研究——基于银行效率和风险的视角

财经论丛 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 60-68.

审慎监管有效性的实证研究——基于银行效率和风险的视角

邵汉华

南昌大学经济管理学院,江西南昌 330031

收稿日期:2016-06-15 出版日期:2017-06-10 发布日期:2017-06-10
作者简介:邵汉华(1986-),男,江西九江人,南昌大学经济管理学院讲师,博士。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AZD014);江西省社会科学“十三五”规划项目(16YJ31);江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目(JJ162013)

An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Prudential Supervision ——From the Perspective of Bank Efficiency and Risks

SHAO Hanhua

School of Economics and Management,Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China

Received:2016-06-15 Online:2017-06-10 Published:2017-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于2007~2013年我国商业银行面板数据,检验审慎监管指标与银行效率和风险的关系,从银行发展的视角对审慎监管有效性进行实证分析。研究发现;较高的资本充足率在降低银行信贷风险的同时,也导致其成本效率和利润效率下降;拨备覆盖率的增加有利于降低银行信贷风险,但却显著地提高了银行成本效率;存贷比监管不仅不能降低银行信贷风险和经营风险,还显著地增加了银行成本效率和利润效率,流动性比率对银行风险和银行效率的影响均不显著。这些结论表明,不同审慎监管工具对银行风险和效率的影响存在差别,部分审慎监管工具在降低银行风险的同时,也降低了银行效率,审慎监管的目标在效率和风险之间存在一定的取舍。

关键词: 审慎监管, 银行效率, 银行风险

Abstract: Based on the micro data of 18 commercial banks of China from 2007 to 2013, this paper conducts an empirical analysis of the relationship between prudential supervision tools and the bank efficiency and risks. The results are as follows: Higher capital adequacy ratio will reduce the cost efficiency and profit efficiency of banks while reducing credit risks of banks; increasing provision coverage is conducive to reduce credit risks of banks, but it will significantly improve the cost efficiency of banks; supervision of loan-to-deposit ratio cannot reduce credit risks or operating risks of banks, but to obviously increase the cost efficiency and the profit efficiency; the influence of liquidity ratio on bank risks and efficiency is not significant. All of these conclusions show that the influence of different prudential supervision tools on bank risks and efficiency is different. Some prudential supervision tools will lower banking efficiency while reducing bank risks, and therefore the objective of prudential supervision faces a trade-off between efficiency and risks.

Key words: Prudential Supervision, Bank Efficiency, Bank Risk

中图分类号:

F832.2

邵汉华. 审慎监管有效性的实证研究——基于银行效率和风险的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2017, 33(6): 60-68.

SHAO Hanhua. An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Prudential Supervision ——From the Perspective of Bank Efficiency and Risks[J]. , 2017, 33(6): 60-68.

参考文献

[1] Barth J. R., Caprio G., Levine R. Rethinking Bank Regulation: Till Angels Govern[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[2] 沈坤荣, 李莉. 银行监管: 防范危机还是促进发展?——基于跨国数据的实证研究及其对中国的启示[J]. 管理世界, 2005, (10): 6-23.
[3] Macroeconomic Assessment Group. Final Report: Assessing the Macroeconomic Impact of the Transition to Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements[Z]. BIS Working Paper, 2010.
[4] Basel Committee For Banking Supervision. An Assessment of the Long-term Economic Impact of Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements[Z]. BIS Working Paper, 2010.
[5] Institute of International Finance.The Cumulative Impact on the Global Economy of Changes in the Financial Regulatory Framework[R]. Washington, DC: Institute of International Finance, 2011.
[6] Slovik P., Cournede B. Macroeconomic Impact of Basel III[Z]. OECD Working Paper, 2011.
[7] Roger S., Vitek F. The Global Macroeconomic Costs of Raising Bank Capital Adequacy Requirements[Z]. IMF Working Paper, 2012.
[8] Kiema I., Jokivuolle E. Leverage Ratio Requirement and Credit Allocation under Basel III[R]. SSRN 1723145, 2010.
[9] Lim C. H., Columba F., Costa A. Macro-prudential Policy: What Instruments and How are They Used? Lessons from Country Experiences[Z]. IMF Working Paper, 2011.
[10] Pausch T. Risk Sensitivity of Banks, Interbank Markets and the Effects of Liquidity Regulation[Z]. NBER Working Paper, 2012.
[11] Neri M. The Unintended Consequences of the Basel III Liquidity Risk Regulation [Z]. NBER Working Paper, 2012.
[12] Chortareas G. E., Girardone C., Ventouri A. Bank Supervision, Regulation, and Efficiency: Evidence from the European Union [J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2012, 8(4): 292-302.
[13] 巴曙松, 金玲玲, 朱元倩. 巴塞尔Ⅲ下的资本监管对中国银行业的影响[J]. 农村金融研究, 2011, (6): 12-17.
[14] 陆静. 巴塞尔协议Ⅲ及其对国际银行业的影响[J]. 国际金融研究, 2011, (3): 56-67.
[15] 施其武. 新监管标准实施对商业银行转型影响的实证研究——基于贷款行为和稳定性的视角[J]. 金融监管研究, 2012, (6): 34-48.
[16] 袁鲲, 饶素凡. 银行资本、风险承担与杠杆率约束——基于中国上市银行的实证研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2014, (8): 52-60.
[17] 程凤朝, 叶依常. 资本充足率对宏观经济的影响分析[J]. 管理世界, 2014, (12): 1-11.
[18] 贾飙, 王博, 文艺. 实施巴塞尔协议Ⅲ对中国宏观经济的影响分析[J]. 南开经济研究, 2015, (2): 136-150.
[19] 梁琪, 李政, 卜林. 中国宏观审慎政策工具有效性研究[J]. 经济科学, 2015, (2): 5-17.
[20] Battese G. E., Coelli T. J. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data [J]. Empirical Economics, 1995, 20 (2): 325-332.
[21] 张宗益, 吴恒宇, 吴俊. 商业银行价格竞争与风险行为关系——基于贷款利率市场化的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2012, (7): 1-14.
[22] 林谦. 金融资产服务业务与银行经营转型[J]. 金融论坛, 2013, (6): 57-64.
[23] Boyd J. H., De Nicolo G. The Theory of Bank Risk Taking and Competition Revisited [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(3): 1329-1343.
[24] 杨天宇, 钟宇平. 中国银行业的集中度、竞争度与银行风险[J]. 金融研究, 2013, (1): 122-134.