税收规避、审计师反应与公司财务报告质量——基于加速折旧的自然实验

财经论丛 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 82-91.

税收规避、审计师反应与公司财务报告质量——基于加速折旧的自然实验

黄冠华, 叶陈刚

对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京 100029

收稿日期:2020-11-11 出版日期:2021-05-10 发布日期:2021-05-12
作者简介:黄冠华(1992-),男,湖北黄冈人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院博士生;叶陈刚(1962-),男,湖北蕲春人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
审计署重点科研课题(20SJ04002)

Tax Avoidance, Auditor Response and Corporate Financial Reporting Quality——Natural Experiment Based on Accelerated Depreciation

HUANG Guanhua, YE Chengang

School of Business, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2020-11-11 Online:2021-05-10 Published:2021-05-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文将加速折旧政策作为激励实体经济合法税收规避的自然实验场景,基于避税代理观与权衡观考察税收规避对公司财务报告质量的影响。研究发现,加速折旧政策颁布后,企业应计盈余管理得到显著抑制。上述影响主要发生在高避税成本(实际税率高、财务杠杆大)的企业,支持了避税权衡观;其次,加速折旧政策还提升了外部审计的监督质量,但对财务报告的监督效果在两权分离度高的企业被削弱,反映出避税代理观部分成立;最后,加速折旧政策刺激了公司真实盈余管理活动,导致权益资本成本和财务风险上升。

关键词: 加速折旧, 盈余管理, 盈余质量, 双重差分, 自然实验

Abstract: This paper evaluates the effects of Chinese accelerated depreciation policy on corporate financial reporting quality. Findings of the study are as follows: First, on average, firms' accrued earnings management is significantly inhibited after the implementation of the policy. Second, this effect mainly occurs in firms with high tax avoidance costs (i. e., high effective tax rate and large leverage), which supports the trade-off theory for tax avoidance. Third, the accelerated depreciation policy has also improved the quality of audits, but the supervision over the reporting quality is weakening in firms with high degree of separation, which means that the agency theory is not unfounded. Finally, this paper finds that the accelerated depreciation policy stimulates firms' real earnings management activities, causing capital costs and financial risks to grow.

Key words: Accelerated Depreciation, Earnings Management, Earnings Quality, Difference in Difference, Natural Experiment

中图分类号:

F275.2

黄冠华, 叶陈刚. 税收规避、审计师反应与公司财务报告质量——基于加速折旧的自然实验[J]. 财经论丛, 2021, 37(5): 82-91.

HUANG Guanhua, YE Chengang. Tax Avoidance, Auditor Response and Corporate Financial Reporting Quality——Natural Experiment Based on Accelerated Depreciation[J]. , 2021, 37(5): 82-91.

参考文献

[1] 刘啟仁,赵灿,黄建忠.税收优惠、供给侧改革与企业投资[J].管理世界,2019,(1):78-96.
[2] Fan Z.,Liu Y.Tax Compliance and Investment Incentives:Firm Responses to Accelerated Depreciation in China[J].Journal of Economic Behavior &Organization,2020,176:1-17.
[3] Desai M.A.,Dharmapala D.Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-Powered Incentives[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2006,79(1):145-179.
[4] Graham J.R.,Hanlon M.,Shevlin T.,Shroff N.Incentives for Tax Planning and Avoidance:Evidence from the Field[J].The Accounting Review,2014,89(3):991-1023.
[5] 刘笑霞,李明辉.税收激进度、外部监督机制与非标准审计意见[J].管理评论,2020,(6):280-291.
[6] Hanlon M.,Heitzman S.A Review of Tax Research[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010,50(2):127-178.
[7] 廖歆欣,刘运国.企业避税、信息不对称与管理层在职消费[J].南开管理评论,2016,(2):87-99.
[8] Balakrishnan K.,Blouin J.L.,Guay W.R.Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Transparency[J].The Accounting Review,2019,94(1):45-69.
[9] Brooks C.,Godfrey C.,Hillenbrand C.,Money K.Do Investors Care About Corporate Taxes?[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2016,38(C):218-248.
[10] Panteghini P.M.,Vergalli S.Accelerated Depreciation,Default Risk and Investment Decisions[J].Journal of Economics,2016,119(2):113-130.
[11] 刘啟仁,赵灿.税收政策激励与企业人力资本升级[J].经济研究,2020,(4):70-85.
[12] Frank M.M.,Lynch L.J.,Rego S.O.Tax Reporting Aggressiveness and its Relation to Aggressive Financial Reporting[J].The Accounting Review,2009,84(2):467-496.
[13] Dechow P.,Ge W.,Schrand C.Understanding Earnings Quality:A Review of the Proxies,Their Determinants and Their Consequences[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010,50(2-3):344-401.
[14] 王亮亮.税制改革与利润跨期转移——基于“账税差异”的检验[J].管理世界,2014,(11):105-118.
[15] Hanlon M.L.The Persistence and Pricing of Earnings,Accruals,and Cash Flows When Firms Have Large Book-Tax Differences[J].The Accounting Review,2005,80(1):137-166.
[16] Blaylock B.,Shevlin T.,Wilson R.J.Tax Avoidance,Large Positive Temporary Book-Tax Differences,and Earnings Persistence[J].The Accounting Review,2012,87(1):91-120.
[17] Wong R.M.K.,Lo A.W.Y.,Firth M.Managing Discretionary Accruals and Book-Tax Differences in Anticipation of Tax Rate Increases:Evidence from China[J].Journal of International Financial Management &Accounting,2015,26(2):188-222.
[18] Choi H.,Hu R.,Karim K.The Effect of Consistency in Book-Tax Differences on Analysts' Earnings Forecasts:Evidence from Forecast Accuracy and Informativeness[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2020,39(3):106740.
[19] Tanya Y.H.T.Does Book-Tax Conformity Deter Opportunistic Book and Tax Reporting? An International Analysis[J].European Accounting Review,2015,24(3):441-469.
[20] Neuman S.S.,Omer T.C.,Schmidt A.P.Assessing Tax Risk:Practitioner Perspectives[J].Contemporary Accounting Research,2020,37(3):1788-1827.
[21] 叶康涛,刘行.税收征管、所得税成本与盈余管理[J].管理世界,2011,(5):140-148.
[22] 盖地,胡国强.税收规避与财务报告成本的权衡研究——来自中国2008年所得税改革的证据[J].会计研究,2012,(3):20-25.
[23] Kanagaretnam K.,Lee J.,Lim C.Y.,Lobo G.J.Relation between Auditor Quality and Tax Aggressiveness:Implications of Cross-Country Institutional Differences[J].Auditing:A Journal of Practice &Theory,2016,35(4):105-135.
[24] 孙健,王百强,曹丰,刘向强.公司战略影响盈余管理吗?[J].管理世界,2016,(3):160-169.
[25] Liu Y.,Mao J.How Do Tax Incentives Affect Investment and Productivity? Firm-Level Evidence from China[J].American Economic Journal:Economic Policy,2019,11(3):261-291.
[26] Cohen D.A.,Zarowin P.Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management Activities Around Seasoned Equity Offerings[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010,50(1):2-19.
[27] 叶康涛,董雪雁,崔倚菁.企业战略定位与会计盈余管理行为选择[J].会计研究,2015,(10):23-29.