产业政策调整与企业创新绩效研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以“五年规划”文件对鼓励行业的调整为政策冲击,构建基于残差法衡量产业政策调整的因果识别策略,采用PSM-DID方法考察产业政策的创新激励效应。研究显示,产业政策主要促进企业的实质性创新,集中于创新数量上的提效和创新质量上的增值,不但通过企业事前创新经验影响其创新决策,而且沿着纵向供应链对客户创新产生溢出效应,并在多个维度呈现异质性表现,而金融市场的信号传递效应和人才集聚效应是两条重要渠道。这一结论意味着产业政策实现企业创新的“提效增值”,打通资金链与人才链协同赋能创新的通道,推动供应链与创新链的深度融合。上述发现客观准确地评估产业政策的创新激励效应,深入探讨创新链、产业链、资金链、人才链的联动效应,对我国产业政策调整及实现政策联动具有重要的启示价值。

关键词: 产业政策, 企业创新, 信号传递效应, 人才集聚效应

Abstract: This paper takes the adjustment of industries encouraged by the central “Five-Year Plan” policies as a policy shock, and constructs a causal identification strategy based on the residual method to examine the innovation incentive effect of industrial policies by employing the PSM-DID approach. The study finds that the industrial policies mainly promote substantial corporate innovation, focusing on efficiency improvements in innovation quantity and value-added enhancements in innovation quality. Not only do they influence innovation decisions by drawing upon corporate prior innovative experiences, but also they exert spillover effects on customers' innovation along the vertical supply chain, showing heterogeneity across multiple dimensions. Mechanism analysis reveals that the signal transmission effect of financial markets and the agglomeration effect of talents are two important channels. The conclusion of this paper implies that industrial policies not only enhance and add value to corporate innovation but also facilitate the integrated empowerment of innovation by aligning capital chains with talent chains and promoting the deep integration of supply chains with innovation chains. These findings provide an objective and accurate assessment of the stimulating effects of industrial policies on innovation and delve into the synergistic effects of innovation, industry, capital, and talent chains, offering significant policy implications for adjusting industrial policies and achieving policy synergy in China.

Key words: Industrial Policy, Corporate Innovation, Signal Transmission Effect, Talent Agglomeration Effect

中图分类号:

F420

常露露, 方森辉. 产业政策调整与企业创新绩效研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2024, 40(6): 16-25.

CHANG Lulu, FANG Senhui. Industrial Policy Adjustment and Chinese Corporate Innovation Performance[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2024, 40(6): 16-25.

参考文献

[1]陈钊, 熊瑞祥. 比较优势与产业政策效果——来自出口加工区准实验的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (8): 67-80.
[2]Romer P. M. Endogenous Technological Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(5): 71-102.
[3]Moshirian F., Tian X., Zhang B., Zhang W. Stock Market Liberalization and Innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, (139): 985-1014.
[4]宋凌云, 王贤彬. 重点产业政策、资源重置与产业生产率[J]. 管理世界, 2013, (12): 63-77.
[5]韩永辉, 黄亮雄, 王贤彬. 产业政策推动地方产业结构升级了吗?——基于发展型地方政府的理论解释与实证检验[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (8): 33-48.
[6]Yang C. Vertical Structure and Innovation: A Study of the SoC and Smartphone Industries[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2020, (3): 739-785.
[7]Aghion P., Cai J., Dewatripont M., Du L., Harrison A., Legros P. Industrial Policy and Competition[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2015, 7(4): 1-32.
[8]Mukherjee A., Singh M., Zaldokas A. Do Corporate Taxes Hinder Innovation?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2017, 124(1): 195-221.
[9]戴小勇, 成力为. 产业政策如何更有效:中国制造业生产率与加成率的证据[J]. 世界经济, 2019, (3): 69-93.
[10]杨国超, 芮萌. 高新技术企业税收减免政策的激励效应与迎合效应[J]. 经济研究, 2020, (9): 174-191.
[11]卞泽阳, 李志远, 徐铭遥. 开发区政策、供应链参与和企业融资约束[J]. 经济研究, 2021, (10): 88-104.
[12]刘毓芸, 程宇玮. 重点产业政策与人才需求——来自企业招聘面试的微观证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, (6): 65-79.
[13]Lu Y., Wang J., Zhu L. Place-based Policies, Creation, and Agglomeration Economies: Evidence from China's Economic Zone Program[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019, 11(3): 325-360.
[14]王永进, 张国峰. 开发区生产率优势的来源:集聚效应还是选择效应?[J]. 经济研究, 2016, (7): 58-71.
[15]张杰, 毕钰, 金岳. 中国高新区“以升促建”政策对企业创新的激励效应[J]. 管理世界, 2021, (7): 76-91.
[16]余明桂, 范蕊, 钟慧洁. 中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016, (12): 5-22.
[17]Khan M. The Role of Industrial Policy: Lessons from Asia, New Perspectives on Industrial Policy for Modern Britain[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, Chapter 5.
[18]Chen I., Hsu P., Wang Y. Staggered Boards and Product Innovations: Evidence from Massachusetts State Bill HB 5640[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(4): 104475.
[19]Pástor $\check{\mathrm{L}}$ ., Veronesi P. Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices[J]. Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(4): 1219-1264.
[20]Ramiah V., Martin B., Moosa I. How Does the Stock Market React to the Announcement of Green Policies?[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2013, 37(5): 1747-1758.
[21]韩乾, 洪永淼. 国家产业政策、资产价格与投资者行为[J]. 经济研究, 2014, (12): 143-158.
[22]李静, 楠玉, 刘霞辉. 中国经济稳增长难题:人力资本错配及其解决途径[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (3): 18-31.
[23]刘善仕, 孙博, 葛淳棉, 等. 人力资本社会网络与企业创新——基于在线简历数据的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017, (7): 88-98.
[24]方森辉, 毛其淋. 高校扩招、人力资本与企业出口质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (11): 97-115.
[25]Bernstein S. Does Going Public Affect Innovation?[J]. Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(4): 1365-1403.
[26]黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, (4): 60-73.
[27]Dass N., Nanda V., Xiao S. Truncation Bias Corrections in Patent Data Implications for Recent Research on Innovation[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017, (44): 353-374.
[28]Brucal A., Javorcik B., Love I. Good for the Environment, Good for Business: Foreign Acquisitions and Energy Intensity[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2019, (121): 103247.
[29]李健, 崔雪, 陈传明. 家族企业并购商誉、风险承担水平与创新投入——基于信号传递理论的研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, (1): 135-146.
[30]魏向杰, 程琦. 产业政策、信号效应与企业创新——基于《中国制造2025》准自然实验[J]. 管理评论, 2023, (8): 117-130.
[31]Glaeser E., Mare D. Cities and Skills[J]. Journal of Labor Economics, 2001, 19(2): 316-342.
[32]Atanassov J., Liu X. Corporate Income Taxes, Financial Constraints and Innovation[Z]. SSRN Working Paper, 2015.
[33]苏丹妮, 盛斌, 邵朝对, 等. 全球价值链、本地化产业集聚与企业生产率的互动效应[J]. 经济研究, 2020, (3): 100-115.
[34]范剑勇, 刘念, 刘莹莹. 地理距离、投入产出关系与产业集聚[J]. 经济研究, 2021, (10): 138-154.
[35]孙雯, 刘人境. 个体知识遗忘对组织创新绩效的影响——双元创新与人员流动的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2022, (3): 101-113.
[36]程惠芳, 陈超. 开放经济下知识资本与全要素生产率——国际经验与中国启示[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (10): 21-36.
[37]Wu Y., Zhu X., Groenewold N. The Determinants and Effectiveness of Industrial Policy in China: A Study Based on Five-Year Plans[J]. China Economic Review, 2019, (53): 225-242.
[38]胡世亮, 黄永春, 徐高彦. 政策生命周期视角下产业政策不确定性与企业创新质量关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, (10): 118-134.
[39]Erkal N. On the Interaction between Patent Policy and Trade Secret Policy[J]. The Australian Economic Review, 2004, 37(4): 427-435.
[40]Osadchiy N., Schmidt W., Wu J. The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Networks[J]. Management Science, 2021, 67(10): 6153-6173.
[41]Chu Y., Tian X., Wang W. Corporate Innovation along the Supply Chain[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65(6): 2445-2466.
[42]Liu E. Industrial Policies in Production Networks[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134(4): 1883-1948.