Configuration Analysis of Influencing Factors of Bootlegging Innovation of S.& T. and Manufacturing Enterprises——Based on QCA

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the survey of employees of S.& T. enterprises and manufacturing enterprises, this paper applies QCA approach to integrate five conditions in behavioral and affective aspects so as to explore the different mechanisms of multiple antecedent paths in bootlegging innovation. The results show that the antecedent path of high bootlegging innovation in S. & T. enterprises is passion-oriented, that is, the linkage matching of high work passion, low knowledge sharing and low expectation contribution can enhance the implementation of bootlegging innovation. The antecedent paths of high bootlegging innovation in manufacturing enterprises are low passion-behavior-oriented and high participation-behavior-oriented. The former refers to the linkage matching between high empowering degree, high knowledge sharing, high expected contribution and low work passion, which can better promote employees' bootlegging innovation. The latter refers to high empowering degree, high knowledge sharing, high expected contribution and low work passion. Linkage matching with high decision-making participation can promote employees' bootlegging innovation. And compared with the low passion-behavior-oriented path, the high participation-behavior-oriented path can better stimulate employees' bootlegging innovation. In the process of promoting bootlegging innovation, there are opposite matching strategies between S.&T. enterprises and manufacturing enterprises in terms of work passion, knowledge sharing and expected contribution. The driving mechanism of not bootlegging innovation is divided into six recipes, which verifies the existence of asymmetric causality compared with high bootlegging innovation.

Key words: Bootlegging Innovation, Antecedents Path, S.&T. Enterprises, Manufacturing Enterprises, QCA

摘要： 以科创企业员工与制造企业员工为样本,运用QCA方法整合行为层面与情感层面的五个条件,探讨了员工越轨创新的多重触发机制。结果显示:科创企业员工的高工作激情、非高知识共享和非高期望贡献的联动匹配能激发其实施越轨创新;制造企业员工的高授权程度、高知识共享、高期望贡献与非高工作激情间的联动匹配能激发其实施越轨创新;同时,高授权程度、高知识共享、高期望贡献与高决策参与的联动匹配也能激发员工越轨创新。在激发越轨创新过程中,科创企业与制造企业在工作激情、知识共享与期望贡献等方面存在相反的匹配策略。研究结果不仅深化和拓展了越轨创新的形成条件,而且为科创企业和制造企业采取针对性创新策略提供了参考借鉴。

关键词: 越轨创新, 触发路径, 科创企业, 制造企业, 定性比较分析

CLC Number:

F270

SUN Ying. Configuration Analysis of Influencing Factors of Bootlegging Innovation of S.& T. and Manufacturing Enterprises——Based on QCA[J]. , 2021, 37(2): 92-102.

孙颖. 科创企业与制造企业越轨创新的触发路径选择——一项模糊集定性比较分析研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2021, 37(2): 92-102.

References

[1] 李树文,罗瑾琏,梁阜. 研发企业内外部学习对组织创新的权变影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, (11):2092-2101.
[2] 孙锐,李树文,顾琴轩. 双元环境下战略人力资源管理影响组织创新的中介机制:企业生命周期视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, (5):176-187.
[3] Zhou X., Fan X., Son J. How and When Matter: Exploring the Interaction Effects of High-Performance Work Systems, Employee Participation, and Human Capital on Organizational Innovation[J]. Human Resource Management, 2019,58(3):253-268.
[4] 黄玮,项国鹏,杜运周,等. 越轨创新与个体创新绩效的关系研究——地位和创造力的联合调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, (1):143-154.
[5] Augsdorfer P. Forbidden Fruit: An Analysis of Bootlegging, Uncertainty, and Learning in Corporate R&D [M]. Aldershot:Avebury, 1996.
[6] Augsdorfer P.A Diagnostic Personality Test to Identify Likely Corporate Bootleg Researchers[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2012, 16(1):1-8.
[7] Criscuolo P., Salter A., Wal A. L. J. T. Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance[J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(5):1287-1305.
[8] 王弘钰,崔智淞,邹纯龙,等. 忠诚还是叛逆？中国组织情境下的员工越轨创新行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, (6):975-989.
[9] Gundling E., Porras J. I. The 3M Way to Innovation: Balancing People and Profit[M]. New York: Kodansha International, 2000.
[10] 王弘钰,邹纯龙,崔智淞. 差序式领导对员工越轨创新行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, (9):137-143.
[11] 刘晓琴. 非伦理领导与员工创新越轨行为:多重中介效应分析[J]. 科研管理, 2019, (3):188-196.
[12] 孙锐,李树文. 科技企业组织情绪能力影响研发员工创新的中介机制研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2017, (6):14-22.
[13] Zhang J., Jiang H., Wu R., et al. Reconciling the Dilemma of Knowledge Sharing: A Network Pluralism Framework of Firms' R&D Alliance Network and Innovation Performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2019,45(7):2635-2665.
[14] Gruber H. E., Wallace D. B. The Case Study Method and Evolving Systems Approach for Understanding Unique Creative People at Work[M]. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[15] Liu D., Chen X. P., Yao X. From Autonomy to Creativity: A Multilevel Investigation of the Mediating Role of Harmonious Passion[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011, 96(2): 294-309.
[16] Klaukien A., Shepherd D. A., Patzelt H. Passion for Work, Nonwork-Related Excitement, and Innovation Managers' Decision to Exploit New Product Opportunities[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(3):574-588.
[17] Meindl J. R. The Romance of Leadership as a Follower-centric Theory: A Social Constructionist Approach.[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(3):329-341.
[18] 谷盟,弋亚群,刘怡. CEO双元领导与企业创新导向的关系[J]. 管理科学, 2018, (3):51-61.
[19] 李涛,王兵. 我国知识工作者组织内知识共享问题的研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2003, (5):16-19.
[20] Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyota Case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3):345-367.
[21] Tsui A. S., Pearce J. L., Porter L. W., et al. Alternative Approaches to the Employee-organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(5): 1089-1997.
[22] Wang D., Tsui A. S., Zhang Y., et al. Employment Relationships and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003, 24(5):511-535.
[23] Vallerand R. J., Blanchard C. M., Mageau G. A., et al. Les Passions de l'Ame: On Obsessive and Harmonious Passion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85(4):756-767.
[24] 李树文,罗瑾琏,梁阜. 与“亲近”的人畅所欲言:双元领导对员工建言的影响路径与边界[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, (6):99-110.
[25] Schilpzand P., Houston L., Cho J. Not Too Tired to Be Proactive: Daily Empowering Leadership Spurs Next-morning Employee Proactivity as Moderated by Nightly Sleep Quality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, (6):2367-2387.
[26] 梁阜, 李树文, 罗瑾琏. 差异化变革型领导对员工创新行为的影响:资源转化视角[J]. 管理科学, 2018, (3):62-74.
[27] Kim S., Ju B. An Analysis of Faculty Perceptions: Attitudes Toward Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration in an Academic Institution[J]. Library and Information Science Research, 2008, 30: 282-290.
[28] 杨博旭,王玉荣,李兴光. “厚此薄彼”还是“雨露均沾” ——组织如何有效利用网络嵌入资源提高创新绩效？[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, (3):201-213.
[29] Ma Z., Long L., Zhang Y., et al. Why Do High-performance Human Resource Practices Matter for Team Creativity? The Mediating Role of Collective Efficacy and Knowledge Sharing[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2017,34(3):565-586.
[30] Alegre J., Chiva R. Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(6):315-326.
[31] Xu R., Zhao L. Impact of External Learning and Organizational Flexibility on Radical Innovation[C]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovation and Management, Kitakyushu, Japan, November 30-December 2, 2011.
[32] Bierly P., Chakrabarti A. Generic Knowledge Strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2):123-135.
[33] 杨刚,宋健敏,纪谱华. 员工创造力与越轨创新:心理特权和道德推脱视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, (5):115-122.
[34] 李鲜苗,徐振亭,霍伟伟. 创意越轨行为对创造力的影响:领导反馈调节与创新自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, (6):138-145.
[35] Bakker A. B., Demerouti E. The Job Demands-resources Model: State of the Art[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2007, (3): 309-328.
[36] Zhang A. Y., Song L. J., Tsui A. S., et al. Employee Responses to Employment-relationship Practices: The Role of Psychological Empowerment and Traditionality[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35(6): 809-830.
[37] Audenaert M., Carette P., Shore L. M., et al. Leader-employee Congruence of Expected Contributions in the Employee-organization Relationship[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2018,29(3):414-422.
[38] 田晓明,李锐. 自我牺牲型领导能促进员工的前瞻行为吗?——责任感知的中介效应及其边界条件[J]. 心理学报, 2015, (12):1472-1485.
[39] Fuller J. B., Hester M. K. Promoting Felt Responsibility for Constructive Change and Proactive Behavior: Exploring Aspects of an Elaborated Model of Work Design[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(8):1089-1120.
[40] Schellenberg B. J. I., Bailis D. S., Mosewich A. D. You Have Passion, But do You Have Self-compassion? Harmonious Passion, Obsessive Passion, and Responses to Passion-related Failure[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, 99:278-285.
[41] St-Louis A. C., Carbonneau N., Vallerand R. J. Passion for A Cause: How It Affects Health and Subjective Well-being[J]. Journal of Personality, 2016,84(3):263-276.
[42] Kong D. T. The Pathway to Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: Organizational Identification as A Joint Function of Work Passion and Trait Mindfulness[J]. Personality & Individual Differences, 2016, 93(4):86-91.
[43] Birkeland I. K. , Nerstad C. Incivility is (not) the Very Essence of Love: Passion for Work and Incivility Instigation[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2015, 21(1):77-90.
[44] 张剑,宋亚辉,叶岚, 等. 工作激情研究:理论及实证[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, (8):1269-1281.
[45] 杨仕元,卿涛,岳龙华. 从支持感到员工创造力——二元工作激情的联合调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, (4):108-117.
[46] Hmieleski K. M., Ensley M. D. A Contextual Examination of New Venture Performance: Entrepreneur Leadership Behavior, Top Management Team Heterogeneity, and Environmental Dynamism[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2007, 28(7):865-889.
[47] Jia L., Shaw J., Tsui A., et al. A Social-structural Perspective on Employee-organization Relationships and Team Creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 57(3), 869-891.
[48] Lin B., Mainemelis C., Kark R. Leaders' Responses to Creative Deviance: Differential Effects on Subsequent Creative Deviance and Creative Performance[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2015,27(4):537-556.
[49] 葛元骎,李树文. 科创企业能力及制度组态效应对产品与流程创新的影响路径对比:基于企业生命周期的QCA分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, (18):106-113.
[50] 李树文,姚柱,张显春. 员工越轨创新实现路径与边界:游戏动态性的触发作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019,(23):147-152.