财经论丛 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 18-27.

• 区域经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国收入分配公平测度研究——基于东中西部地区面板数据的比较分析

孙敬水, 赵倩倩   

  1. 浙江工商大学经济学院,浙江 杭州 310018
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-30 出版日期:2017-02-10 发布日期:2017-02-10
  • 作者简介:孙敬水(1958-),男,安徽蚌埠人,浙江工商大学经济学院教授,博士生导师; 赵倩倩(1991-),女,河南商丘人,浙江工商大学经济学院硕士生
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY14G030003); 浙江省哲学社会科学规划重点课题(14NDJC015Z)

Research on the Evaluation of the Income Distributive Fairness in China——Comparative Analysis based on the Panel Data of the Eastern Area,the Central Area and the Western Area

SUN Jingshui, ZHAO Qianqian   

  1. School of Economics,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China
  • Received:2016-05-30 Online:2017-02-10 Published:2017-02-10

摘要: 文章界定了收入分配公平的内涵,从初次分配公平和再分配公平两大方面构建了分配公平评价指标体系,提出了分配公平的测度方法,基于1985~2013年东中西部地区面板数据,对中国收入分配公平程度进行综合评价与比较分析。研究结果表明:我国收入分配总体上处于相对公平状态,呈现上升趋势。其中初次分配处于比较公平状态,再分配处于相对公平状态,初次分配公平度大于再分配公平度。我国东中西部地区收入分配总体上处于比较公平状态。其中,东部和西部地区初次分配处于比较公平状态、再分配处于相对公平状态,中部地区初次分配和再分配依次处于非常公平和比较公平状态。从三大地区比较看,收入分配公平度总体上相差较小。其中初次分配公平度和再分配公平度,中部地区相对较高,东部和西部地区相对较低。这一研究结果提供了重要的政策启示。

关键词: 分配公平, 初次分配公平, 再分配公平, 评价指标体系, 测度方法

Abstract: This article defines the meaning of income distributive fairness,constructs the evaluation indicators system of distributive fairness from the two aspects of initial distributive fairness and redistributive fairness,proposes the evaluation methods of distributive fairness,and makes comprehensive assessment and comparative analysis to the degree of income distributive fairness in China based on the panel data of the eastern area,the central area and the western area from 1985 to 2013. The research results indicate that: (1) The state of distributive fairness is relatively equitable in the whole country and shows an upward trend. Among them,the state of initial distributive fairness is fairly equitable,the state of redistributive fairness is relatively equitable,and the degree of fairness in initial distributive is higher than that in redistributive. (2) The state of distributive fairness is relatively equitable in the three areas. Among them,the state of initial distributive fairness in the eastern and the western are more equitable,the state of redistributive fairness in the eastern and the western areas is relatively fair,the state of initial distributive and redistributive in the central area is very fair and more equitable respectively. (3) The gap of distributive fairness is small in comparison of the three areas. Among them,the degree of fairness in initial distributive and redistributive in the central area is higher than that in the eastern and western areas. This finding has important implications for future policy development.

Key words: Distributive Fairness, Initial Distributive Fairness, Redistributive Fairness, Evaluation Indicators System, Evaluation Methods

中图分类号: