信息准确度会影响地方债发行利率和流动性吗？——基于专项债券创新试点政策的分析

财经论丛 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 33-43.

信息准确度会影响地方债发行利率和流动性吗？——基于专项债券创新试点政策的分析

刘乐峥¹, 蒋晓婉²

1.中央财经大学中国公共财政与政策研究院,北京 100081;
2.中国工商银行博士后工作站,北京 100031

收稿日期:2018-11-01 出版日期:2019-10-10 发布日期:2019-10-09
作者简介:刘乐峥(1977-),男,云南昆明人,中央财经大学中国公共财政与政策研究院副教授,博士;蒋晓婉(1991-),女,辽宁鞍山人,中国工商银行博士后工作站,博士后。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71373292);2018年度财政部共建联合研究课题(024050318020)

Does Accuracy of Information Affect Coupon Rate and Liquidity of Local Government Bond?——Analysis Based on the Pilot Policy of Special Bond Innovation

LIU Lezheng¹, JIANG Xiaowan²

1.Academy of Public Finance and Public Policy, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China;
2.Postdoctoral Workstation, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Beijing 100031, China

Received:2018-11-01 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 发展地方政府债券市场、开好地方政府举债的“前门”是加强地方政府债务管理的关键环节。2017年财政部推行的专项债券创新试点政策本质上是以拆包发行的方式从细分项目类别、明确项目所在地和平衡项目收支三个维度提高专项债券的信息准确度。本文使用倾向得分匹配法探究专项债券信息准确度对债券发行利率和流动性的影响。研究发现,与非特定品种的专项债券相比,新型专项债券的发行利率提高约11个基点,债券平均交易间隔缩短约23天。本文旨在通过探究地方政府专项债券创新试点的政策效果,为进一步发展我国地方政府债券市场提供参考。

关键词: 地方政府债券, 信息准确度, 发行利率, 债券流动性, 倾向得分匹配

Abstract: Developing the local government bond market, which means opening the “front door” of local government debt, is the key link to strengthen local government debt management. The special bond innovation pilot policy implemented by the Ministry of Finance in 2017 essentially aims to improve the information accuracy of special bonds from the following three dimensions: segmenting categories, defining project locations and balancing project revenue and expenditure by unpacking. This paper uses propensity score matching method to explore the impact of the accuracy of special bond information on coupon rate and liquidity. The study finds that compared with non-specific special bonds, the coupon rate of new type special bonds has increased by about 11 base points, and the average trading interval of bonds has decreased by about 23 days. The purpose of this paper is to provide a reference for further development of China's local government bond market by exploring the policy effects of local government special bond innovation pilots.

Key words: Local Government Bonds, Information Accuracy, Issuing Rate, Bond Liquidity, Propensity Score Matching

中图分类号:

F812.5

刘乐峥, 蒋晓婉. 信息准确度会影响地方债发行利率和流动性吗？——基于专项债券创新试点政策的分析[J]. 财经论丛, 2019, 35(10): 33-43.

LIU Lezheng, JIANG Xiaowan. Does Accuracy of Information Affect Coupon Rate and Liquidity of Local Government Bond?——Analysis Based on the Pilot Policy of Special Bond Innovation[J]. , 2019, 35(10): 33-43.

参考文献

[1] Coval J.,Jurek J.,Stafford E. The Economics of Structured Finance[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2009,23(1):3-26.
[2] DeMarzo P. M. The Pooling and Tranching of Securities:A Model of Informed Intermediation[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2005,18(1):1-35.
[3] Fairchild L. M.,Koch T. W. The Impact of State Disclosure Requirements on Municipal Yields[J]. National Tax Journal,1998,51(4):733-753.
[4] Baber W. R.,Gore A. K. Consequences of GAAP Disclosure Regulation:Evidence from Municipal Debt Issues[J]. Accounting Review,2008,83(3):565-591.
[5] Poterba J. M.,Rueben K. S. Fiscal News,State Budget Rules,and Tax-Exempt Bond Yields[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2001,50(3):537-562.
[6] Johnson C. L.,Kriz K. A. Fiscal Institutions,Credit Ratings,and Borrowing Costs[J]. Public Budgeting & Finance,2010,25(1):84-103.
[7] Wang J.,Wu C.,Zhang F. X. Liquidity,Default,Taxes,and Yields on Municipal Bonds[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance,2008,32(6):1133-1149.
[8] Schwert M. Municipal Bond Liquidity and Default Risk[J]. Journal of Finance,2017,72(4):1683-1722.
[9] 同生辉,黄张凯.我国城投债券发行利率影响因素的实证分析[J]. 财政研究,2014,(6):72-74.
[10] 刘天保,王涛,徐小天.我国地方政府债券定价机制研究——以发行利率影响因素为视角[J]. 财经问题研究,2017,(12):76-82.
[11] 韩鹏飞,胡奕明.政府隐性担保一定能降低债券的融资成本吗?——关于国有企业和地方融资平台债券的实证研究[J]. 金融研究,2015,(3):116-130.
[12] 汪莉,陈诗一.政府隐性担保、债务违约与利率决定[J]. 金融研究,2015,(9):66-81.
[13] 马文涛,马草原.政府担保的介入、稳增长的约束与地方政府债务的膨胀陷阱[J]. 经济研究,2018,(5):72-87.
[14] 王永钦,陈映辉,杜巨澜.软预算约束与中国地方政府债务违约风险:来自金融市场的证据[J]. 经济研究,2016,(11):96-109.
[15] 朱莹,王健.市场约束能够降低地方债风险溢价吗?——来自城投债市场的证据[J]. 金融研究,2018,(6):56-72.
[16] 王永钦,戴芸,包特.财政分权下的地方政府债券设计:不同发行方式与最优信息准确度[J]. 经济研究,2015,(11):65-78.
[17] 卡尔·沃尔特,弗雷泽·豪伊. 红色资本[M]. 上海:东方出版中心,2013.
[18] Lian Y.,Zhi S.,Gu Y. Evaluating the Effects of Equity Incentives Using PSM:Evidence from China[J]. Frontiers of Business Research in China,2011,5(2):266-290.
[19] Stürmer T.,Joshi M.,Glynn RJ,et al. A Review of the Application of Propensity Score Methods Yielded Increasing Use,Advantages in Specific Settings,but not Substantially Different Estimates Compared with Conventional Multivariable Methods[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2006,59(5):437.e1-437.e24.
[20] Abadie A.,Imbens G. W. Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects[J]. Econometrica,2006,74(1):235-267.