财经论丛 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 51-60.

• 金融与投资 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国定向货币政策效果与货币调控方式转型

张炜1, 景维民2, 姜旭男1   

  1. 1.天津商业大学经济学院,天津 300134;
    2.南开大学经济学院,天津 300071
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-19 出版日期:2019-11-10 发布日期:2019-12-16
  • 作者简介:张炜(1984-),女,天津市人,天津商业大学经济学院副教授;景维民(1956-),男,天津市人,南开大学经济学院教授;姜旭男(1994-),男,天津市人,天津商业大学经济学院硕士生。
  • 基金资助:
    天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJLJ18-004)

The Effect of China's Directional Monetary Policy and the Transformation of Monetary Regulation

ZHANG Wei1, JING Weimin2, JIANG Xunan1   

  1. 1.School of Economics, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China;
    2. School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • Received:2019-03-19 Online:2019-11-10 Published:2019-12-16

摘要: 2018年以来为了加快经济逆周期调节,央行6次定向降准并实施一系列MLF、TMLF、SLF、CBS等定向货币工具,大量资金涌入银行间。宽松的数量型货币政策真的将资金传导进入实体经济内部了吗?定向货币政策实施效果如何?为回答以上问题,本文构建含有金融摩擦的BGG-DSGE模型,引入借贷成本与借贷收益两种货币政策有效性影响因素,研究发现单一数量型货币规则调控很难达到有效经济目标。基于此,本文进一步构建货币政策混合规则模型,通过校准与贝叶斯方法估计利率规则、数量规则与混合规则三个模型参数,通过模拟发现,从数量型向价格型货币政策转型不可一蹴而就,混合规则更加适合中国当前经济环境。因此,在数量型货币政策有效性较低的情况下,不妨加大价格型货币政策调节力度,在未来货币政策选择上通过结构性混合规则,加快经济逆周期调节步伐。

关键词: 货币政策有效性, 利率规则, 数量规则, 混合规则, 货币调控转型

Abstract: Since 2018, in order to accelerate the countercyclical adjustment of the economy, the central bank has cut the required reserve ratio six times and implemented a series of targeted monetary instruments, such as MLF, TMLF, SLF and reverse repurchase, and a large amount of money has flooded into the interbank market. Has loose quantitative monetary policy really channeled money into the real economy? How effective is the targeted monetary policy? In order to answer the above questions, this paper constructs a BGG-DSGE model with financial friction and introduces two factors that influence the effectiveness of monetary policy, namely,the borrowing cost and the borrowing income. It is found that it is difficult to achieve effective economic goals by using a single quantitative monetary regulation. Based on this, this paper further constructs the mixed rule situation of monetary policy and estimates the three model parameters of interest rules, quantitative rules and mixed rules through calibration and bayesian method. Through simulation, it is found that the transformation from quantitative monetary policy to price monetary policy cannot be accomplished overnight, and the mixed rules are more suitable for China's current economic environment. Therefore, when the current quantitative monetary policy is less effective, it is advisable to increase the use of price monetary policy and accelerate the countercyclical adjustment of the economy through structural mixed rules in the choice of future monetary policy.

Key words: Effectiveness of Monetary Policy, Interest Rules, Quantitative Rules, Mixed Rules, Transformation of Monetary Regulation

中图分类号: