监管设计、效率变革与福利改善——兼论RPI-X定价模型的监管困境

财经论丛 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 103-113.

• 政府管制 • 上一篇

监管设计、效率变革与福利改善——兼论RPI-X定价模型的监管困境

于文领¹, 李宏舟², 闫明喆²

1.江苏省社会科学院,江苏南京 210004;
2.东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心,辽宁大连 116012

收稿日期:2023-05-24 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-10
通讯作者: 李宏舟(1971—),男,河北唐山人,东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心研究员。
作者简介:于文领(1988—),男,江苏南京人,江苏省社会科学院助理研究员;闫明喆(1992—),女,河北邢台人,东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心博士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(72173016);东北财经大学科研平台研究能力提升专项(PT-Y202212)

System Design,Efficiency Change and Welfare Improvement: Annotation of the Regulatory Dilemma of RPI-X Pricing Model

YU Wenling¹, LI Hongzhou², YAN Mingzhe²

1. Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Social Sciences,Nanjing 210004,China;
2. Center for Industrial and Business Organization,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116012,China

Received:2023-05-24 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文利用随机前沿分析框架测算中国电网公司的效率变革,在此基础上选择反事实分析法,模拟实施新型规制模式的成本效应和福利效应。实证结果表明,效率导向型收入上限规制不是零和博弈,能带来监管改革红利。据此,进一步优化现有输配电价规制模式,不仅可改革输配电行业中被掩盖的低效率环节,还可将其转化为推动行业高质量发展的重要源泉,实现电网公司的效率变革和社会福利的改善。

关键词: 监管设计, RPI-X规制, 效率变革, 随机前沿模型, 福利改善

Abstract: Regulatory design is an important foundation for improving corporate governance and modernizing governance capabilities. A well-designed regulatory framework deeply influences the efficiency of firms, the reshaping of industrial patterns, and the improvement of social welfare. The efficiency-oriented revenue cap regulation is a regulatory design based on the concept of high-quality development and the institutional construction of “from existence to excellence”. In order to evaluate its practical effects, this article uses the stochastic frontier analysis framework to measure the efficiency changes of China's power grid companies, based on which the counterfactual analysis is applied to simulate the cost and welfare effects of implementing the new regulatory model. The empirical results show that the efficiency-oriented revenue cap regulation is not a zero-sum game and can bring about regulatory reform dividends. Therefore, further optimizing the existing electricity transmission and distribution price regulation model can not only reform the hidden inefficiencies in the industry but also transform them into important sources for promoting high-quality development in the industry, achieving corporate efficiency changes, and improving social welfare.

Key words: System Design, RPI-X Regulation, Efficiency Change, Stochastic Frontier Model, Welfare Improvement

中图分类号:

F425

于文领, 李宏舟, 闫明喆. 监管设计、效率变革与福利改善——兼论RPI-X定价模型的监管困境[J]. 财经论丛, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.

YU Wenling, LI Hongzhou, YAN Mingzhe. System Design,Efficiency Change and Welfare Improvement: Annotation of the Regulatory Dilemma of RPI-X Pricing Model[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.

参考文献

[1]让·雅克·拉丰, 让·梯若尔. 政府采购与规制中的激励理论[M]. 石磊, 王永钦, 译. 上海: 格致出版社, 2014.
[2]王俊豪, 鲁桐, 王永利. 发达国家基础设施产业的价格管制政策及其借鉴意义[J]. 世界经济与政治, 1997, (10): 37-41.
[3]唐晓华, 唐要家. 不完全信息与网络产业激励性规制改革[J]. 中国工业经济, 2002, (6): 71-77.
[4]于立, 于左. 美国收益率规制与英国价格上限规制的比较[J]. 产业经济研究, 2003, (1): 11-18.
[5]范合君, 柳学信, 王家. 英国、德国市政公用事业监管的经验及对我国的启示[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2007, (8): 82-86.
[6]王俊豪. A-J效应与自然垄断产业的价格管制模型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2001, (10): 33-39.
[7]蔡建刚, 叶泽. 信息不对称条件下激励相容的输配电价模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, (5): 91-97.
[8]庞雨蒙. 竞争政策、企业全要素生产率与资源配置效应[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, (1): 17-24.
[9]俞秀梅, 王敏. 阶梯电价改革对我国居民电力消费的影响[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, (2): 731-756.
[10]李林威, 赵喆, 刘帮成. “放管服”背景下我国电力体制改革成效评估及优化路径研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021, (5): 140-158.
[11]宋枫, 崔健, 蒋志高. 效率提升、租金转移与市场化改革[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2023, (2): 464-480.
[12]叶泽. 当前我国输配电价改革成效、问题及对策[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2016, (2): 35-42.
[13]曹学泸, 黄恒孜, 赵雯. 新电改背景下省级电网企业的效率测算与激励机制[J]. 财经论丛, 2022, (4): 105-113.
[14]Kendrick J. W. Efficiency Incentives and Cost Factors in Public Utility Automatic Revenue Adjustment Clauses[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1975, 6(1): 299-313.
[15]Vogelsang I., Finsinger J. A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1): 157-171.
[16]Bradley I., Price C. The Economic Regulation of Private Industries by Price Constraints[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1988, 37(1): 99-106.
[17]Bernstein J. I., Sappington D. E. M. Setting the X Factor in Price-cap Regulation Plans[J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1999, 16(1): 5-26.
[18]AER. Annual Benchmarking Report: Electricity Distribution Network Service Providers[R]. Australia: Australian Energy Regulator, 2019.
[19]Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Benchmarking and Regulation: International Electricity Experience[J]. Utilities Policy, 2000, 9(3): 107-130.
[20]Colombi R., Martini G., Vittadini G. A Stochastic Frontier Model with Short-run and Long-run Inefficiency Random Effects[Z]. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, 2011, pp. 1-19.
[21]Jondrow J., Knox Lovell C. A., Materov I. S., et al. On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1982, 19(2): 233-238.
[22]Afsharian M., Ahn H., Lopes A., et al. Pitfalls in Estimating the X-factor: The Case of Energy Transmission Regulation in Brazil[J]. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 2019, (65): 1-9.
[23]林伯强. 结构变化、效率改进与能源需求预测——以中国电力行业为例[J]. 经济研究, 2003, (5): 57-65.
[24]何晓萍, 刘希颖, 林艳苹. 中国城市化进程中的电力需求预测[J]. 经济研究, 2009, (1): 118-130.
[25]唐要家, 杨健. 销售电价隐性补贴及改革的经济影响研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (12): 5-17.
[26]张昕竹, 刘自敏. 分时与阶梯混合定价下的居民电力需求——基于DCC模型的分析[J]. 经济研究, 2015, (3): 146-158.

监管设计、效率变革与福利改善——兼论RPI-X定价模型的监管困境

System Design,Efficiency Change and Welfare Improvement: Annotation of the Regulatory Dilemma of RPI-X Pricing Model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics